About this item:

155 Views | 170 Downloads

Author Notes:

Correspondence to: Hyun S. Kim, MD. Yale School of Medicine, Yale Cancer Center, 330 Cedar Street, TE 2-224, New Haven, CT 06510, USA. Email: kevin.kim@yale.edu or Bassel F. El-Rayes, MD. Emory University School of Medicine, 1365 Clifton Road, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA. Email:belraye@emory.edu.

Ethical Statement: The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at the Emory University.

All patients were consented in order to be rolled into the study and use their secured personal data and clinical information for the purposes of the study.

We did not enrolled patients younger than 18-year-old.

The study outcomes did not affect the future management of the patients.

Conflicts of Interest: HS Kim served on Advisory boards for Boston Scientific and SIRTex.

The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Subject:

Research Funding:

BTG (West Conshohocken, PA)

United States Department of Defense (CA160741)

Keywords:

  • Science & Technology
  • Life Sciences & Biomedicine
  • Oncology
  • Gastroenterology & Hepatology
  • Efficacy
  • gemcitabine
  • hepatic metastasis
  • intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC)
  • pancreatic adenocarcinoma
  • radioembolization
  • safety yttrium-90
  • PET RESPONSE CRITERIA
  • RADIATION-THERAPY
  • RADIOEMBOLIZATION THERAPY
  • MICROSPHERES
  • SURVIVAL
  • CANCER
  • TUMORS
  • CHEMOTHERAPY
  • CARCINOMA
  • GLASS

Phase Ib trial of gemcitabine with yttrium-90 in patients with hepatic metastasis of pancreatobiliary origin

Tools:

Journal Title:

Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology

Volume:

Volume 10, Number 5

Publisher:

, Pages 944-956

Type of Work:

Article | Final Publisher PDF

Abstract:

Background: Gemcitabine, a chemotherapy for hepatic metastasis with pancreatic cancer (PC) or intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) origin, may radiosensitize the targeted tumor cells for yttrium-90 radioembolization (90Y-RE). This clinical trial was designed to investigate the effects of a combination of 90Y-RE and gemcitabine in hepatic metastasis of PC or ICC origin. Methods: Fourteen patients who had histopathologic diagnosis of unresectable hepatic metastasis of PC or ICC origin were enrolled into the open-label phase Ib clinical trial. Induction dose of gemcitabine on day 1 was followed by 90Y-RE on day 2 with predetermined doses of gemcitabine to follow till week 12. Maximal tolerated dose (MTD) of gemcitabine in combination with 90Y-RE, associated toxicities and hepatic progression free survival (HPFS) were assessed. The tumor response rate was evaluated using both RECIST and PERCIST criteria. Results: Eight patients met the study criteria; three with PC and five with ICC. The mean age of the patients was 69.4 years. Seven out of 8 patients tolerated predetermined gemcitabine regime (dose level 1 at 400 mg/m2 and dose level 2 at 600 mg/m2). All of the patients developed grade 1 toxicities. Three patients (37.5%) had grade 2 hepatobiliary toxicity and one patient (12.5%) had grade 3 hepatobiliary toxicity, who was hospitalized for a short-term. The median HPFS was 8.7 months for all patients. The objective response rate was 62%. Conclusions: A combination of 90Y-RE and gemcitabine at 600 mg/m2 is a safe and potential treatment option for hepatic metastasis of pancreaticobiliary origin.

Copyright information:

© 2019 Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology.

Export to EndNote