About this item:

359 Views | 347 Downloads

Author Notes:

Correspondence to Dr. Nicola J Hancock, University of East Anglia School of Health Sciences, Norwich, UK; n.hancock@uea.ac.uk

See publication for full list of author contributions.

We are grateful to the Research and Development team at the Cambridge and Peterborough NHS Foundation Trust (CPFT) for their support for this project and the CPFT clinicians who took the time to participate and provide valuable insight into using ViaTherapy.

Competing interests: None declared.

Subjects:

Research Funding:

This project was funded by the University of East Anglia Impact Funding (HEIF).

Initial support for the development of the ViaTherapy app came from the Canadian Stroke Network.

Keywords:

  • clinical practice guidelines
  • quality improvement

Evidence-based practice 'on-the-go': using ViaTherapy as a tool to enhance clinical decision making in upper limb rehabilitation after stroke, a quality improvement initiative.

Tools:

Journal Title:

BMJ Open Quality

Volume:

Volume 8, Number 3

Publisher:

, Pages e000592-e000592

Type of Work:

Article | Final Publisher PDF

Abstract:

Recovery of upper limb function after stroke is currently sub-optimal, despite good quality evidence showing that interventions enabling repetitive practice of task-specific activity are effective in improving function. Therapists need to access and engage with such evidence to optimise outcomes with people with stroke, but this is challenging in fast-paced stroke rehabilitation services. This quality improvement project aimed to investigate acceptability and service impact of a new, international tool for accessing evidence on upper limb rehabilitation after stroke-'ViaTherapy'-in a team of community rehabilitation therapists. Semi-structured interviews were undertaken at baseline to determine confidence in, and barriers to, evidence-based practice (EBP) to support clinical decision making. Reported barriers included time, lack of access to evidence and a research-practice disconnect. The clinicians then integrated use of 'ViaTherapy' into their practice for 4 weeks. Follow-up interviews explored the accessibility of the tool in community rehabilitation practice, and its impact on clinician confidence, treatment planning and provision. Clinicians found the tool, used predominantly in mobile device app format, to be concise and simple to use, providing evidence 'on-the-go'. Confidence in accessing and using EBP grew by 22% from baseline. Clinicans reported changes in intensity of delivery of interventions, as rapid access to recommended doses via the tool was available. Following this work, the participating health and social care service provider changed provision of therapists' technology to enable use of apps. Barriers to use of EBP in stroke rehabilitation persist; the baseline situation here supported the need for more accessible means of integrating best evidence into clinical processes. This quality improvement project successfully integrated ViaTherapy into clinical practice, and found that the tool has potential to underpin positive changes in upper limb therapy service delivery after stroke, by increasing accessibility to, use of and confidence in EBP. Definitive evaluation is now indicated.

Copyright information:

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019.

This is an Open Access work distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).
Export to EndNote