About this item:

120 Views | 109 Downloads

Author Notes:

Jeremy L. Neal, 461 21st Avenue South, Nashville, TN, 37240 United States, (615) 875-9998 (work), (614) 557-2146 (cell), jeremy.neal@vanderbilt.edu.

The authors kindly acknowledge the database development support received from Ms. Tara Borlawsky-Payne, MA, Adjunct Instructor within The Ohio State University Department of Biomedical Informatics, Columbus, Ohio; and Mr. Vipin Moolchandani from the Information Warehouse at The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio.

Subjects:

Research Funding:

Dr. Julia Phillippi was supported by grant number K08HS024733 from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality during manuscript production.

Dr. Nicole Carlson was supported by grant number K01NR016984 from the National Institute of Nursing Research during manuscript production.

Keywords:

  • Science & Technology
  • Life Sciences & Biomedicine
  • Nursing
  • Cesarean section
  • Labor onset
  • Labor stage, First
  • Oxytocin
  • Parity
  • Parturition
  • OUTCOMES
  • ADMISSION
  • DELIVERY
  • PHASE
  • CARE

Likelihood of cesarean birth among parous women after applying leading active labor diagnostic guidelines

Tools:

Journal Title:

Midwifery

Volume:

Volume 67

Publisher:

, Pages 64-69

Type of Work:

Article | Post-print: After Peer Review

Abstract:

Objectives: Hospital admission during early labor may increase women's risk for medical and surgical interventions. However, it is unclear which diagnostic guideline is best suited for identifying the active phase of labor among parous women. Dr. Emanuel Friedman, the United Kingdom's National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists/Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (ACOG/SMFM) support different active labor diagnostic guidelines. Our aims were (1) to determine the proportions of parous women admitted to the hospital before or in active labor per these leading guidelines and (2) to compare associations of labor status at admission (i.e., early labor or active labor) with oxytocin augmentation, cesarean birth, and adverse birth outcomes when using the different active labor diagnostic guidelines. Design: Active labor diagnostic guidelines were applied retrospectively to cervical examination data. Binomial logistic regression was used to assess associations of labor status at admission (i.e., early labor relative to active labor) and outcomes. Setting: A large, academic, tertiary medical center in the Midwestern United States. Participants: Parous women with spontaneous labor onset who gave birth to a single, cephalic-presenting fetus at term gestation between 2006 and 2010 (n = 3,219). Findings: At admission, 28.8%, 71.9%, and 24.4% of parous women were in active labor per Friedman, NICE, and ACOG/SMFM diagnostic guidelines, respectively. Oxytocin augmentation was more likely among women admitted in early labor, regardless of the diagnostic strategy used (p < 0.001 for each guideline). Cesarean birth was also more likely among women admitted before versus in active labor according to all guidelines (Friedman: adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 3.63 [95% CI 1.46–9.03]), NICE: AOR 2.71 [95% CI 1.47–4.99]), and ACOG/SMFM: AOR 2.11 [95% CI 1.02–4.34]). There were no differences in a composite measure of adverse outcomes within active labor diagnostic guidelines after adjusting for covariates. Key conclusions: Many parous women with spontaneous labor onset are admitted to the hospital before active labor. These women are more likely to receive oxytocin augmentation during labor and are more likely to have a cesarean birth. Implications for practice: Diagnosing active labor prior to admission or prior to intervention aimed at speeding labor after admission may decrease likelihoods for primary cesarean births. The NICE dilation-rate based active labor diagnostic guideline is more inclusive than Friedman or ACOG/SMFM guidelines and its use may be the most clinically-useful for improving the likelihood of vaginal birth among parous women.

Copyright information:

© 2018 Elsevier Ltd

This is an Open Access work distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Creative Commons License

Export to EndNote