About this item:

254 Views | 300 Downloads

Author Notes:

Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Jamie Hanson, Learning Research & Development Center, University of Pittsburgh, 3939 O'Hara Street, Rm. 715, Pittsburgh, PA 15260. Electronic mail may be sent to jamie.hanson@pitt.edu

We thank all the staff at the Center for Translational & Prevention Science and The Center for Family Research, both at The University of Georgia, Athens, for their assistance with data collection and study management.

Subject:

Research Funding:

This work was supported by National Institute on Drug Abuse Grants P30‐DA027827 (to Gene H. Brody).

Keywords:

  • Social Sciences
  • Psychology, Educational
  • Psychology, Developmental
  • Psychology
  • CHILDHOOD POVERTY
  • SOCIOECONOMIC-STATUS
  • ORBITOFRONTAL CORTEX
  • BEHAVIORAL-PROBLEMS
  • EFFORTFUL CONTROL
  • BRAIN STRUCTURE
  • STRESS
  • CHILDRENS
  • ADVERSITY
  • PROGRAM

A Family Focused Intervention Influences Hippocampal-Prefrontal Connectivity Through Gains in Self-Regulation

Show all authors Show less authors

Tools:

Journal Title:

Child Development

Volume:

Volume 90, Number 4

Publisher:

, Pages 1389-1401

Type of Work:

Article | Final Publisher PDF

Abstract:

Child Development published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Society for Research in Child Development. The stressors associated with poverty increase the risks for externalizing psychopathology; however, specific patterns of neurobiology and higher self-regulation may buffer against these effects. This study leveraged a randomized control trial, aimed at increasing self-regulation at ~11 years of age. As adults, these same individuals completed functional MRI scanning (Mage = 24.88 years; intervention n = 44; control n = 49). Functional connectivity between the hippocampus and ventromedial prefrontal cortex was examined in relation to the intervention, gains in self-regulation, and present-day externalizing symptoms. Increased connectivity between these brain areas was noted in the intervention group compared to controls. Furthermore, individual gains in self-regulation, instilled by the intervention, statistically explained this brain difference. These results begin to connect neurobiological and psychosocial markers of risk and resiliency.

Copyright information:

© 2018 The Authors.

This is an Open Access work distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).

Creative Commons License

Export to EndNote