About this item:

973 Views | 275 Downloads

Author Notes:

Address correspondence and reprints to: Beau B. Bruce, Department of Ophthamology, Emory University, 1365-B Clifton Rd, NE, Atlanta, GA 30303. bbbruce@emory.edu

Subject:

Research Funding:

This study was supported in part by a departmental grant (Department of Ophthalmology) from Research to Prevent Blindness, Inc., New York, by core grant P30-EY06360 (Department of Ophthalmology). Dr. Bruce has received research support from NIH/NCRR (KL2-RR025009, UL1-RR025008), the NIH/NEI (K23-EY019341), Knights Templar Eye Foundation, and received the American Academy of Neurology Practice Research Fellowship. Dr. Lamirel receives research support from Institut Servier (Paris, France), Fondation Planiol (Varennes, France), Ophtalmologie Progrès en Anjou (Angers, France), and the Philippe Foundation, Inc. (New York, NY). Dr. Wright received research support from NIH/PHS (KL2-RR025009). Dr. Biousse received research support from NIH/PHS (UL1-RR025008) and the Knights Templar Eye Foundation. Dr. Newman is a recipient of the Research to Prevent Blindness Lew R. Wasserman Merit Award.

Feasibility of Non-Mydriatic Ocular Fundus Photography in the Emergency Department: Phase I of the FOTO-ED Study

Tools:

Journal Title:

Academic Emergency Medicine

Volume:

Volume 18, Number 9

Publisher:

, Pages 928-933

Type of Work:

Article | Post-print: After Peer Review

Abstract:

Objectives Examination of the ocular fundus is imperative in many acute medical and neurologic conditions, but direct ophthalmoscopy by non-ophthalmologists is underutilized, poorly performed, and difficult without pharmacologic pupillary dilation. The objective was to examine the feasibility of non-mydriatic fundus photography as a clinical alternative to direct ophthalmoscopy by emergency physicians (EPs). Methods Adult patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with headache, acute focal neurologic deficit, diastolic blood pressure ≥ 120 mmHg, or acute visual change had ocular fundus photographs taken by nurse practitioners using a non-mydriatic fundus camera. Photographs were reviewed by a neuro-ophthalmologist within 24 hours for findings relevant to acute ED patient care. Nurse practitioners and patients rated ease, comfort, and speed of non-mydriatic fundus photography on a 10-point Likert scale (10 best). Timing of visit and photography were recorded by automated electronic systems. Results Three hundred fifty patients were enrolled. There were 1,734 photographs taken during 230 nurse practitioner shifts. Eighty-three percent of the 350 patients had at least one eye with a high quality photograph, while only 3% of patients had no photographs of diagnostic value. Mean ratings were ≥ 8.7 (standard deviation [SD] ≤ 1.9) for all measures. The median photography session lasted 1.9 minutes (interquartile range [IQR] 1.3 to 2.9 minutes), typically accounting for less that 0.5% of the patient’s total ED visit. Conclusions Non-mydriatic fundus photography taken by nurse practitioners is a feasible alternative to direct ophthalmoscopy in the ED. It is performed well by non-physician staff, is well-received by staff and patients, and requires a trivial amount of time to perform.

Copyright information:

© 2011 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine

Export to EndNote