Contribution of vision to postural behaviors during continuous support-surface translations

• Authors: D. Joseph Jilk, Georgia Institute of Technology; Seyed A. Safavynia, Emory University; Lena Ting, Emory University
• Journal Title: Experimental Brain Research
• Volume: Volume 232, Number 1
• Publisher: Springer (part of Springer Nature): Springer Open Choice Hybrid Journals | 2014-01-01, Pages 169-180
• Type of Work: Article | Post-print: After Peer Review
• Publisher DOI: http://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-013-3729-4
• Subjects: Engineering, Biomedical
• Keywords: Science & Technology; Life Sciences & Biomedicine; Neurosciences; Neurosciences & Neurology; Balance; Posture; Kinematics; Kinetics; Perturbation response; CENTER-OF-MASS; VESTIBULAR LOSS; BALANCE CONTROL; CONTINUOUS PERTURBATIONS; JOINT COORDINATION; MUSCLE SYNERGIES; ALTERED SUPPORT; CONTROL MODEL; STANCE WIDTH; QUIET STANCE

Abstract

During standing balance, kinematics of postural behaviors have been previously observed to change across visual conditions, perturbation amplitudes, or perturbation frequencies. However, experimental limitations only allowed for independent investigation of such parameters. Here, we adapted a pseudorandom ternary sequence (PRTS) perturbation previously used in rotational support-surface perturbations (Peterka in J Neurophysiol 88(3):1097-1118, 2002) to a translational paradigm, allowing us to concurrently examine the effects of vision, perturbation amplitude, and frequency on balance control. Additionally, the unpredictable PRTS perturbation eliminated effects of feedforward adaptations typical of responses to sinusoidal stimuli. The PRTS perturbation contained a wide spectral bandwidth (0.08-3.67 Hz) and was scaled to 4 different peak-to-peak amplitudes (3-24 cm). Root mean square (RMS) of hip displacement and velocity increased relative to RMS ankle displacement and velocity in the absence of vision across all subjects, especially at higher perturbation amplitudes. Gain and phase lag of center of mass (CoM) sway relative to the perturbation also increased with perturbation frequency; phase lag further increased when vision was absent. Together, our results suggest that visual input, perturbation amplitude, and perturbation frequency can concurrently and independently modulate postural strategies during standing balance. Moreover, each factor contributes to the difficulty of maintaining postural stability; increased difficulty evokes a greater reliance on hip motion. Finally, despite high degrees of joint angle variation across subjects, CoM measures were relatively similar across subjects, suggesting that the CoM is an important controlled variable for balance.