About this item:

253 Views | 226 Downloads

Author Notes:

Hazel Malapit, International Food Policy Research Institute, 1201 Eye Street, NW, Washington, DC 20005-3915, USA. E-mail: h.malapit@cgiar.org

This work would not be possible without the commitment and collaboration of the projects in the GAAP2 portfolio.

We thank the GAAP2 project teams for their invaluable inputs in the development and piloting of the pro-WEAI, and for their helpful comments on earlier versions of this paper.

We also thank two anonymous referees, Chiara Kovarik, John McDermott, Farzana Ramzan, and Vicki Wilde for their insightful comments and suggestions; Emily Myers and Audrey Pereira for research assistance; and Jay Willis for editing and formatting the manuscript.

Subject:

Research Funding:

Funding support for this study was provided by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF) [Grant number: OPP1125297]; the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) [Grant number: EEM-G-00-04-00013-00]; and A4NH.

Keywords:

  • Social Sciences
  • Development Studies
  • Economics
  • Business & Economics
  • Agency
  • Agricultural development
  • Multidimensional measurement
  • Gender equality
  • Women's empowerment
  • AGENCY
  • VALIDATION
  • NUTRITION

Development of the project-level Women's Empowerment in Agriculture Index (pro-WEAI)

Show all authors Show less authors

Tools:

Journal Title:

World Development

Volume:

Volume 122

Publisher:

, Pages 675-692

Type of Work:

Article | Final Publisher PDF

Abstract:

With growing commitment to women's empowerment by agricultural development agencies, sound methods and indicators to measure women's empowerment are needed to learn which types of projects or project-implementation strategies do and do not work to empower women. The Women's Empowerment in Agriculture Index (WEAI), which has been widely used, requires adaptation to meet the need for monitoring projects and assessing their impacts. In this paper, the authors describe the adaptation and validation of a project-level WEAI (or pro-WEAI) that agricultural development projects can use to identify key areas of women's (and men's) disempowerment, design appropriate strategies to address identified deficiencies, and monitor project outcomes related to women's empowerment. The 12 pro-WEAI indicators are mapped to three domains: intrinsic agency (power within), instrumental agency (power to), and collective agency (power with). A gender parity index compares the empowerment scores of men and women in the same household. The authors describe the development of pro-WEAI, including: (1) pro-WEAI's distinctiveness from other versions of the WEAI; (2) the process of piloting pro-WEAI in 13 agricultural development projects during the Gender, Agriculture, and Assets Project, phase 2 (GAAP2); (3) analysis of quantitative data from the GAAP2 projects, including intrahousehold patterns of empowerment/disempowerment; and (4) a summary of the findings from the qualitative work exploring concepts of women's empowerment in the project sites. The paper concludes with a discussion of lessons learned from pro-WEAI and possibilities for further development of empowerment metrics.

Copyright information:

© 2019 The Authors

This is an Open Access work distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Export to EndNote