About this item:

787 Views | 131 Downloads

Author Notes:

Correspondence: Emmanuel Emukah, Phone: +234-816-343-2989; Email: emukahe@yahoo.com

Acknowledgments: We thank the State Ministry of Health Delta for approving this study and providing the logistics, human, and material resources used.

Dr. Patricia Graves provided helpful comments to the manuscript.

Disclosures: The funding sources had no role in the study design, collection, analysis, or interpretation of data, in the writing of the report, or in the decision to submit the paper for publication.

Authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Subject:

Research Funding:

We thank Chevron Nigeria Limited, the John Hussman Foundation, and the Izumi Foundation for funding support to the Delta State schistosomiasis program.

JG was supported in part by PHS Grant UL1 RR025008 and KL2 RR025009 from the Clinical and Translational Science Award program, National Institutes of Health, National Center for Research Resources.

Keywords:

  • Schistosomiasis
  • Praziquantel
  • Mass Treatment
  • hematuria
  • monitoring
  • Nigeria

Urine heme dipsticks are useful in monitoring the impact of Praziquantel treatment on Schistosoma haematobium in sentinel communities of Delta State, Nigeria

Tools:

Journal Title:

Acta Tropica

Volume:

Volume 122, Number 1

Publisher:

, Pages 126-131

Type of Work:

Article | Post-print: After Peer Review

Abstract:

Nigeria is highly endemic for infection with Schistosoma haematobium, which most commonly manifests itself with blood in urine. To monitor the impact of annual mass drug administration (MDA) with praziquantel for S. haematobium in Delta State, Nigeria, cross-sectional hematuria surveys of school children were conducted in 8 sentinel villages (SVs) at baseline (n=240) and after two annual doses (n=402). We assessed the comparability of three assessments of hematuria (child’s reported history, nurse visual diagnosis (NVD) and dipstick) to determine the need for mass treatment. Dipstick was considered to be the gold standard. Prior to treatment, history and NVD each identified only the 3 most highly prevalent SVs, and overall this represented just 37.5% of the 8 SVs in need of treatment. Following treatment, after dipstick prevalence decreased by 88.5% (p<0.001), and history and NVD identified only one of two villages still needing treatment. The study suggests that dipsticks should be the recommended method for launching and monitoring mass treatment for S. haematobium.

Copyright information:

© 2012, Elsevier

This is an Open Access work distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommerical-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/).

Creative Commons License

Export to EndNote