About this item:

220 Views | 95 Downloads

Author Notes:

Address correspondence to Jennifer M. Wu, UNC Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery, 3032 Old Clinic Building, CB#7570, Chapel Hill, NC 27599. jennifer_wu@med.unc.edu

Wu, Markland: study concept and design, data analysis and interpretation, manuscript preparation.

Matthews, Vaughan: data interpretation, manuscript preparation.

Jennifer Wu has been a consultant for Proctor and Gamble.

Catherine Matthews has received research grants from Pelvalon, AMS, and Intuitive Surgical and been a consultant for AMS.

Camille Vaughan has received research grants from Astellas.

Subject:

Research Funding:

This study was supported in part from Veterans Health Administration Career Development Awards (CDA-2) to Drs. Markland (B6126W) and Vaughan (1 IK2 RX000747–01).

Dr. Wu is supported by K23HD068404, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health & Human Development.

Keywords:

  • Science & Technology
  • Life Sciences & Biomedicine
  • Geriatrics & Gerontology
  • Gerontology
  • dual incontinence
  • fecal incontinence
  • older adults
  • urinary incontinence
  • PELVIC FLOOR DISORDERS
  • RISK-FACTORS
  • PREVALENCE
  • POPULATION
  • SEVERITY

Urinary, Fecal, and Dual Incontinence in Older US Adults

Tools:

Journal Title:

Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

Volume:

Volume 63, Number 5

Publisher:

, Pages 947-953

Type of Work:

Article | Post-print: After Peer Review

Abstract:

Objectives To estimate the prevalence of urinary (UI), fecal (FI), and dual incontinence (DI) and to identify shared factors associated with each type of incontinence in older U.S. women and men. Design Population-based cross-sectional study. Setting National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES, 2005-2010). Participants Women and men aged 50 and older. Measurements UI was defined as moderate to severe (≥3 on a validated UI severity index, range 0-12); FI was at least monthly loss of solid, liquid, or mucus stool; and DI was the presence of UI and FI. Results Women were more likely than men to report UI only and DI but not FI only (UI only, women 19.8%, men 6.4%; FI only, women 8.2%, men 8.4%; DI women, 6.0%, men 1.9%). In both sexes, prevalence increased with age. In regression models adjusted for parity and hysterectomy, DI in women was associated with non-Hispanic white race (odds ratio (OR) = 2.3, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.5-3.4), depression (OR = 4.7, 95% CI = 2.0-11.1), comorbidities (OR = 4.3, 95% CI = 1.9-9.6 for ≥3 comorbidities vs none), hysterectomy (OR = 1.8, 95% CI = 1.2-2.7), and diarrhea (OR = 2.8, 95% CI = 1.5-5.0). In men, ADL impairment (OR = 2.4, 95% CI = 1.2-4.9) and poorer self-rated health (OR = 2.8, 95% CI = 1.5-5.30) were associated with DI. Conclusion UI, FI, and DI are common in older women and men. Factors associated with DI were distinct from those associated with UI and FI. There were also differences according to sex, with DI associated with depression and comorbid diseases in women and lack of functional ability and poorer self-rated health in men.

Copyright information:

© 2015, The American Geriatrics Society.

Export to EndNote