About this item:

114 Views | 82 Downloads

Author Notes:

Corresponding author: Adriana Galvan, Ph.D., Yerkes National Primate Research Center, Emory University, 954 Gatewood Road NE, Atlanta, GA 30329, Phone: (404) 712-8841, Fax: (404) 727-9294, agalvan@emory.edu.

We thank Xing Hu, Susan Jenkins and Yuxian Ma for technical assistance.

Subject:

Research Funding:

These studies were supported by a grant from the Tourette Syndrome Association (YS) and by the base grant to the Yerkes National Primate Research Center (NIH/NCRR RR-00165).

Keywords:

  • Science & Technology
  • Life Sciences & Biomedicine
  • Neurosciences
  • Neurosciences & Neurology
  • acetylcholine
  • extracellular recording
  • microdialysis
  • phasically active neuron
  • tonically active neuron
  • DEEP BRAIN-STIMULATION
  • NEOSTRIATAL PROJECTION NEURONS
  • MEDIAN-PARAFASCICULAR COMPLEX
  • CM-PF COMPLEX
  • SQUIRREL-MONKEY
  • BASAL GANGLIA
  • CHOLINERGIC INTERNEURONS
  • EFFERENT CONNECTIONS
  • PARKINSONS-DISEASE
  • RAT STRIATUM

Effects of stimulation of the centromedian nucleus of the thalamus on the activity of striatal cells in awake rhesus monkeys

Tools:

Journal Title:

European Journal of Neuroscience

Volume:

Volume 29, Number 3

Publisher:

, Pages 588-598

Type of Work:

Article | Post-print: After Peer Review

Abstract:

Although the existence of a massive projection from the caudal intralaminar nuclei of the thalamus [i.e. the centromedian (CM) and parafascicular nuclei] to the striatum is well documented, the effects of CM activation upon striatal cells remain poorly understood. Therefore, we studied the effects of electrical stimulation of CM on the electrophysiological activity of striatal neurons, and on striatal levels of γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) and acetylcholine in rhesus monkeys. Striatal cells did not respond to single-pulse stimulation (bipolar biphasic stimulation, 175-500 μA), but the large majority of recorded neurons responded to burst stimulation (100 Hz, 1 s, 150-175 μA) of CM, often with a delay of tens of milliseconds. Striatal phasically active neurons, which likely correspond to projection neurons, responded mainly with increases in firing (13/28 cells), while tonically active neurons (likely cholinergic interneurons) often showed combinations of increases and decreases in firing (24/46 cells). In microdialysis studies, CM stimulation led to a reduction of striatal acetylcholine levels. This effect was prevented by addition of the GABA-A receptor antagonist gabazine to the microdialysis fluid. We conclude that CM stimulation frequently results in striatal response patterns with excitatory and inhibitory components. Under the conditions chosen here, the specific patterns of striatal responses to CM stimulation are likely the result of striatal processing of thalamic inputs. Through these indirect effects, local CM stimulation may engage large portions of the striatum. These effects may be relevant in the interpretation of the therapeutic effects of CM stimulation for the treatment of neurological disorders.

Copyright information:

© The Authors (2009).

Export to EndNote