About this item:

499 Views | 453 Downloads

Author Notes:

Correspondence: Erin Robbins, Emory Infant and Child Lab, Department of Psychology, Emory University, 36 Eagle Row, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA. E-mail: eerobbi@emory.edu

Acknowledgments: Our gratitude goes to Britt Berg and the students of the Emory University Infant and Child Lab for data collection, coding, and analysis.

Our thanks also go to Tanya and James Broesch for helping in the conceptualization of the project in its early stages and for their assistance collecting data in Samoa.

Disclosures: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Subject:

Emerging signs of strong reciprocity in human ontogeny

Tools:

Journal Title:

Frontiers in Psychology

Volume:

Volume 2, Number 353

Publisher:

, Pages 1-14

Type of Work:

Article | Final Publisher PDF

Abstract:

Strong reciprocity is considered here as the propensity to sacrifice resources to be kind or to punish in response to prior acts, a behavior not simply reducible to self-interest and a likely force behind human cooperation and sociality. The aim was to capture emerging signs of strong reciprocity in human ontogeny and across highly contrasted cultures. Three- and 5-year-old middle class American children (N = 162) were tested in a simple, multiple round, three-way sharing game involving the child, a generous puppet, and a stingy puppet. At the end of the game, the child was offered an opportunity to sacrifice some of her personal gains to punish one of the puppets. By 3 years, American children demonstrate a willingness to engage in costly punishment. However, only 5-year-olds show some evidence of strong reciprocity by orienting their punishment systematically toward the stingy puppet. Further analyses and three additional control conditions demonstrate that such propensity is not simply reducible to (a) straight imitation, or (b) inequity aversion. To assess the relative universality of such development, a group of 5- to 6-year-old children from rural Samoa (N = 14) were tested and compared to age and gender-matched American children. Samoan children did not manifest the same propensity toward strong reciprocity. The results are interpreted as pointing to (1) the developmental emergence of an ethical stance between 3 and 5 years of age, and (2) that the expression of such stance by young children could depend on culture.

Copyright information:

© 2011 Robbins and Rochat

This is an Open Access work distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/).

Creative Commons License

Export to EndNote