About this item:

498 Views | 413 Downloads

Author Notes:

Lindsey Lowder: lolowde@emory.edu; lindseyoga@gmail.com

Jennifer Hauenstein and Ashley Woods have contributed equally to this work.

LL, JH, DS, SN analyzed and interpreted the DNA microarray analysis.

AW and LL provided the introduction.

LL, SN, MS performed the histological examination of the brain samples.

HC performed the pathway enrichment.

LL, HC, JK, SS performed the pathway interpretation.

MR and JK determined survival characteristics.

BW, SS and JO provided the clinical data including surgical and imaging characteristics.

LL was the main contributor in writing the manuscript.

All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Subjects:

Research Funding:

Research reported in this publication was supported in part by the Biostatistics and Bioinformatics shared resource of Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University and NIH/NCI under Award Number P30CA138292.

Funding for data interpretation and analysis (Winship Cancer Institute Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Shared Resource) was provided by K08 award NS083626 (Principal investigator: Soma Sengupta, M.D., Ph.D.).

Keywords:

  • Science & Technology
  • Life Sciences & Biomedicine
  • Oncology
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Neurosciences & Neurology
  • Gliosarcoma
  • Glioblastoma
  • Glioma
  • Oncoscan
  • Microarray
  • EGFR
  • HOX GENES
  • GLIOBLASTOMA
  • OVEREXPRESSION
  • EXPRESSION
  • MUTATIONS
  • RECEPTOR
  • CELLS

Gliosarcoma: distinct molecular pathways and genomic alterations identified by DNA copy number/SNP microarray analysis

Show all authors Show less authors

Tools:

Journal Title:

Journal of Neuro-Oncology

Volume:

Volume 143, Number 3

Publisher:

, Pages 381-392

Type of Work:

Article | Final Publisher PDF

Abstract:

Purpose: Gliosarcoma is a histologic variant of glioblastoma (GBM), and like GBM carries a poor prognosis. Median survival is less than one (1) year with less than 5% of patients alive after 5 years. Although there is no cure, standard treatment includes surgery, radiation and chemotherapy. While very similar to GBM, gliosarcoma exhibits several distinct differences, morphologically and molecularly. Therefore, we report a comprehensive analysis of DNA copy number changes in gliosarcoma using a cytogenomic DNA copy number (CN) microarray (OncoScan®). Methods: Cytogenomic DNA copy number microarray (OncoScan®) was performed on 18 cases of gliosarcoma. MetaCore™ enrichment was applied to the array results to detect associated molecular pathways. Results: The most frequent alteration was copy number loss, comprising 57% of total copy number changes. The number of losses far exceeded the number of amplifications (***, < 0.001) and loss of heterozygosity events (***, < 0.001). Amplifications were infrequent (4.6%), particularly for EGFR. Chromosomes 9 and 10 had the highest number of losses; a large portion of which correlated to CDKN2A/B loss. Copy number gains were the second most common alteration (26.2%), with the majority occurring on chromosome 7. MetaCore™ enrichment detected notable pathways for copy number gains including: HOXA, Rho family of GTPases, and EGFR; copy number loss including: WNT, NF-kß, and CDKN2A; and copy number loss of heterozygosity including: WNT and p53. Conclusions: The pathways and copy number alterations detected in this study may represent key drivers in gliosarcoma oncogenesis and may provide a starting point toward targeted oncologic analysis with therapeutic potential.

Copyright information:

© 2019, The Author(s).

This is an Open Access work distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Export to EndNote