About this item:

508 Views | 565 Downloads

Author Notes:

Correspondence: Grace K Pavlath; gpavlat@emory.edu

Authors’ contributions: CP and GKP conceived of and designed the study.

CP performed the research.

CP and GKP analyzed the research and wrote the manuscript.

Both authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgments: We thank Dr James P Canner for critical reading of the manuscript and helpful suggestions, and Dr Michael Kutner for statistical advice.

Disclosures: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Subject:

Research Funding:

This work was supported by grants to GKP from the Muscular Dystrophy Association (186852) and the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, National Institutes of Health (AR-061267).

Keywords:

  • Aging
  • mdx
  • Muscle injury
  • Muscle regeneration
  • Muscular dystrophy
  • Myofiber branching

Incidence and severity of myofiber branching with regeneration and aging

Tools:

Journal Title:

Skeletal Muscle

Volume:

Volume 4, Number 9

Publisher:

Type of Work:

Article | Final Publisher PDF

Abstract:

Background Myofibers with an abnormal branching cytoarchitecture are commonly found in muscular dystrophy and in regenerated or aged nondystrophic muscles. Such branched myofibers from dystrophic mice are more susceptible to damage than unbranched myofibers in vitro, suggesting that muscles containing a high percentage of these myofibers are more prone to injury. Little is known about the regulation of myofiber branching.Methods To gain insights into the formation and fate of branched myofibers, we performed in-depth analyses of single myofibers isolated from dystrophic and nondystrophic (myotoxin-injured or aged) mouse muscles. The proportion of branched myofibers, the number of branches per myofiber and the morphology of the branches were assessed. Results Aged dystrophic mice exhibited the most severe myofiber branching as defined by the incidence of branched myofibers and the number of branches per myofiber, followed by myotoxin-injured, wild-type muscles and then aged wild-type muscles. In addition, the morphology of the branched myofibers differed among the various models. In response to either induced or ongoing muscle degeneration, branching was restricted to regenerated myofibers containing central nuclei. In myotoxin-injured muscles, the amount of branched myofibers remained stable over time. Conclusion We suggest that myofiber branching is a consequence of myofiber remodeling during muscle regeneration. Our present study lays valuable groundwork for identifying the molecular pathways leading to myofiber branching in dystrophy, trauma and aging. Decreasing myofiber branching in dystrophic patients may improve muscle resistance to mechanical stress.

Copyright information:

© 2014 Pichavant and Pavlath; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

This is an Open Access work distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Export to EndNote