About this item:

479 Views | 323 Downloads

Author Notes:

Correspondence: Brent M. Horton; Email: bhorto2@emory.edu

Authors' Contributions: Conceived and designed the experiments: BMH, MEH and DLM.

Performed the experiments: BMH.

Analyzed the data: BMH and MEH.

Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: BMH and DLM.

Wrote the paper: BMH, MEH and DLM.

Acknowledgments: We thank the Forest Society of Maine for our field site, the Hemlock Stream Forest, and J. Metzler, A. St. Louis, and F. Oaks for access to the land.

We are grateful to our dedicated field crews. J. Michaud, C. McKee, and C. Gurguis were significant in STI data collection, and A. Annis, E. Burns, J. Cava, and A. Cornell provided reliable assistance. A. Grozhik designed Figure 1.

Disclosures: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Subject:

Research Funding:

Funding was provided by NIH R01 MH082833-02 to D. Maney.

Morph Matters: Aggression Bias in a Polymorphic Sparrow

Tools:

Journal Title:

PLoS ONE

Volume:

Volume 7, Number 10

Publisher:

, Pages 1-5

Type of Work:

Article | Final Publisher PDF

Abstract:

In species with discrete morphs exhibiting alternative behavioral strategies, individuals may vary their aggressive behavior in competitive encounters according to the phenotype of their opponent. Such aggression bias has been documented in multiple polymorphic species evolving under negative frequency-dependent selection, but it has not been well-studied under other selection regimes. We investigated this phenomenon in white-throated sparrows (Zonotrichia albicollis), a passerine with plumage polychromatism maintained by disassortative mating. The two distinct color morphs differ with respect to reproductive strategy in that white-striped birds invest more in territorial aggression than tan-striped birds. Whether territorial aggression in this species is biased according to the morph of an intruder is less understood. We found that during peak territorial and mating activity, both color morphs and sexes can exhibit aggression bias, but whether they do so depends on the strategy (morph) of the intruder. During simulated territorial intrusions, resident white-striped males and tan-striped females, which represent the opposite ends of a continuum from high to low territorial aggression, altered their territorial responses according to intruder morph. Tan-striped males and white-striped females, which represent the middle of the continuum, did not show a bias. We propose that because of the disassortative mating system and morph differences in reproductive strategy, the fitness risks of intrusions vary according to the morphs of the resident and the intruder, and that aggression bias is an attuned response to varying threats to fitness.

Copyright information:

© 2012 Horton et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

This is an Open Access work distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Export to EndNote