Magnetic Resonance Angiography in Extracranial Giant Cell Arteritis

• Authors: Marcel Koenigkam-Santos, University of Sao Paulo; Puneet Sharma, Emory University; Bobby Kalb, Emory University; John Oshinski, Emory University; Cornelia M. Weyand, Emory University; Jorg J. Goronzy, Emory University; Diego R. Martin, Emory University
• Journal Title: JCR: Journal of Clinical Rheumatology
• Volume: Volume 17, Number 6
• Publisher: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins | 2011-09-01, Pages 306-310
• Type of Work: Article | Post-print: After Peer Review
• Publisher DOI: http://doi.org/10.1097/RHU.0b013e31822acec6
• Subjects: Health Sciences, Radiology
• Keywords: Science & Technology; Life Sciences & Biomedicine; Rheumatology; large artery vasculitis; giant cell arteritis; MRI; MRA; LARGE-VESSEL VASCULITIS; TEMPORAL ARTERITIS; POLYMYALGIA-RHEUMATICA; INVOLVEMENT; DIAGNOSIS; SONOGRAPHY; DISEASE

Abstract

Noninvasive diagnosis of giant cell arteritis (GCA) remains challenging, particularly with regard to evaluation of extracranial arterial disease. The objective of the study was to retrospectively review extracranial involvement in patients with GCA and/or polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR), evaluated with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), especially 3-dimensional contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography images of the aortic arch and its branches. Clinical information, biopsy status, and MRI examinations of 28 patients with GCA/PMR were reviewed. Patient images were mixed randomly with 20 normal control images and were independently reviewed by 2 radiologists. Interobserver agreement for detection of arterial stenosis was determined by the k coefficient. Both readers described vascular alterations in keeping with extracranial GCA in 19 of 28 patients (67%) with good interobserver agreement (k = 0.73) and with even higher agreement on diagnosing nonocclusive versus occlusive disease (k = 1.00). The most common lesions were bilateral axillary stenosis or obstructions, observed by both readers in 8 patients (28%). Among the 19 patients with magnetic resonance angiography lesions in the subclavian/axillary arteries, 12 (75%) had biopsy-proven GCA, but only 5 (41%) of these patients had clinical features of large artery disease. In our series review, MRI could provide accurate information on involvement of the aortic arch and its branches in extracranial GCA, depicting different degrees of stenosis. Our analysis also illustrates that occult large artery vasculitis should be considered in patients without biopsy-proven GCA, patients with classic GCA but without clinical signs of large artery disease, and in patients initially diagnosed as having PMR.