About this item:

193 Views | 218 Downloads

Author Notes:

Julie M. McCarthy, Department of Psychology, University of Maryland College Park, College Park, MD 20742, United States, jmccarth@umd.edu, Phone: +1-301-405-1531, Fax: +1-301-314-9566.

Julie McCarthy completed the literature search, implemented the study, and conducted analyses.

Michael Treadway designed the study task and assisted with manuscript preparation.

Jack Blanchard and Julie McCarthy were responsible for study design/development and drafting of the manuscript.

All authors contributed to and have approved the final manuscript.

We thank the participants and research assistants who made this study possible.

Dr. Blanchard has consulted with and served on a scientific advisory board for Genentech/Roche.

All other authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Subjects:

Research Funding:

Funding for this research project was provided by the NIH/NIMH T32 Schizophrenia Research Training Program (MH20075).

Keywords:

  • Anhedonia
  • Effort
  • Motivation
  • Reward
  • Schizotypy
  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Analysis of Variance
  • Anhedonia
  • Decision Making
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Motivation
  • Perceptual Disorders
  • Probability
  • Reward
  • Young Adult

Motivation and effort in individuals with social anhedonia

Tools:

Journal Title:

Schizophrenia Research

Volume:

Volume 165, Number 1

Publisher:

, Pages 70-75

Type of Work:

Article | Post-print: After Peer Review

Abstract:

It has been proposed that anhedonia may, in part, reflect difficulties in reward processing and effortful decision making. The current study aimed to replicate previous findings of effortful decision making deficits associated with elevated anhedonia and expand upon these findings by investigating whether these decision making deficits are specific to elevated social anhedonia or are also associated with elevated positive schizotypy characteristics. The current study compared controls (n = 40) to individuals elevated on social anhedonia (n = 30), and individuals elevated on perceptual aberration/magical ideation (n = 30) on the Effort Expenditure for Rewards Task (EEfRT). Across groups, participants chose a higher proportion of hard tasks with increasing probability of reward and reward magnitude, demonstrating sensitivity to probability and reward values. Contrary to our expectations, when the probability of reward was most uncertain (50% probability), at low and medium reward values, the social anhedonia group demonstrated more effortful decision making than either individuals high in positive schizotypy or controls. The positive schizotypy group only differed from controls (making less effortful choices than controls) when reward probability was lowest (12%) and the magnitude of reward was the smallest. Our results suggest that social anhedonia is related to intact motivation and effort for monetary rewards, but that individuals with this characteristic display a unique and perhaps inefficient pattern of effort allocation when the probability of reward is most uncertain. Future research is needed to better understand effortful decision making and the processing of reward across a range of individual difference characteristics.

Copyright information:

© 2015 Elsevier B.V.

This is an Open Access work distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Creative Commons License

Export to EndNote