About this item:

398 Views | 301 Downloads

Author Notes:

Correspondence: Alison R. Weiss weissa@ohsu.edu

AW, JW, and RR acquired the data.

AW and JB designed the experiments, analyzed the data, and prepared the manuscript.

The veterinary and animal husbandry staff at YNPRC provided expert care and handling of the animals during the course of this study.

The image core facility provided support during the MR imaging.

Members of the Bachevalier laboratory provided help with the surgical procedures and rearing of the monkeys during infancy.

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Subjects:

Research Funding:

This work was supported by the National Institute of Mental Health (MH-58846 to JB and T32-HD071845 to AW), the National Science Foundation (NSF-GRFP DGE-1444932 to AW), and the National Center for Research Resources P51RR165, currently supported by the Office of Research Infrastructure Programs/OD P51OD11132.

Keywords:

  • Science & Technology
  • Life Sciences & Biomedicine
  • Neurosciences
  • Neurosciences & Neurology
  • excitotoxic lesion
  • attentional set-shifting
  • reversal learning
  • perseveration
  • proactive interference
  • DORSOLATERAL PREFRONTAL CORTEX
  • VENTRAL HIPPOCAMPAL LESION
  • FRONTAL-LOBE
  • WORKING-MEMORY
  • PARAHIPPOCAMPAL CORTICES
  • ORBITOFRONTAL CORTEX
  • NEUROTOXIC LESIONS
  • ENTORHINAL CORTEX
  • FOS EXPRESSION
  • MONKEYS

Impaired Cognitive Flexibility After Neonatal Perirhinal Lesions in Rhesus Macaques

Tools:

Journal Title:

Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience

Volume:

Volume 13

Publisher:

, Pages 6-6

Type of Work:

Article | Final Publisher PDF

Abstract:

Previous research indicated that monkeys with neonatal perirhinal lesions (Neo-PRh) were impaired on working memory (WM) tasks that generated proactive interference, but performed normally on WM tasks devoid of interference (Weiss et al., 2016). This finding suggested that the early lesions disrupted cognitive processes important for resolving proactive interference, such as behavioral inhibition and cognitive flexibility. To distinguish between these possibilities, the same Neo-PRh monkeys and their controls were tested using the Intradimensional/Extradimensional attentional set-shifting task (Roberts et al., 1988; Dias et al., 1997). Neo-PRh monkeys completed the Simple and Compound Discrimination stages, the Intradimensional Shift stage, and all Reversal stages comparably to controls, but made significantly more errors on the Extradimensional Shift stage of the task. These data indicate that impaired cognitive flexibility was the likely source of increased perseverative errors made by Neo-PRh monkeys when performing WM tasks, rather than impaired behavioral inhibition, and imply that the perirhinal cortex and its interactions with the PFC may play a unique and critical role in the development of attentional set shifting abilities.

Copyright information:

© 2019 Weiss, White, Richardson and Bachevalier.

This is an Open Access work distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Export to EndNote