About this item:

326 Views | 226 Downloads

Author Notes:

Correspondence: jsubramanian@saint-lukes.org; ashiq_masood@rush.edu

RI and AM contributed to the design of study, involved in acquisition, analysis and interpretation of data; involved in drafting the manuscript and revising it critically for important intellectual content.

ZA, OMT, CE, AK, PC, JC, KK, NM, BD involved in data acquisition, analysis and interpretation of data and involved in drafting the manuscript.

LSC, SR, RM, BE, TP, AH, JS were involved in revising the manuscript critically for important intellectual content.

All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ashiq Masood Advisory board and speaker Bureau Bristol-Myers Squibb and Boehringer Ingelheim, Honorarium Biocept. Janakiraman Subramanian Advisory board - Astra Zeneca, Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Alexion, Paradigm, Bristol-Myers Squibb Speakers Bureau - Astra Zeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Lilly Research Support - Biocept and Paradigm.

Arif Hussain Advisory board – Novartis, Bayer, Astra Zeneca, Consultant – Bristol-Myers-Squibb.

All other authors declare that they have no competing interest.

Subjects:

Research Funding:

Part of A.H.’s time was supported by a Merit Review Award (I01 BX000545), Medical Research Service, Department of Veterans Affairs.

Keywords:

  • Science & Technology
  • Life Sciences & Biomedicine
  • Biochemistry & Molecular Biology
  • Oncology
  • Right-sided colon cancer
  • Left-sided colon cancer
  • Rectal cancers
  • Clonal evolution
  • Proteomics
  • Hotspot mutations

Comparative proteogenomic analysis of right-sided colon cancer, left-sided colon cancer and rectal cancer reveals distinct mutational profiles

Show all authors Show less authors

Journal Title:

Molecular Cancer

Volume:

Volume 17, Number 1

Publisher:

, Pages 177-177

Type of Work:

Article | Final Publisher PDF

Abstract:

Right-sided colon cancer (RCC) has worse prognosis compared to left-sided colon cancer (LCC) and rectal cancer. The reason for this difference in outcomes is not well understood. We performed comparative somatic and proteomic analyses of RCC, LCC and rectal cancers to understand the unique molecular features of each tumor sub-types. Utilizing a novel in silico clonal evolution algorithm, we identified common tumor-initiating events involving APC, KRAS and TP53 genes in RCC, LCC and rectal cancers. However, the individual role-played by each event, their order in tumor development and selection of downstream somatic alterations were distinct in all three anatomical locations. Some similarities were noted between LCC and rectal cancer. Hotspot mutation analysis identified a nonsense mutation, APC R1450∗specific to RCC. In addition, we discovered new significantly mutated genes at each tumor location, Further in silico proteomic analysis, developed by our group, found distinct central or hub proteins with unique interactomes among each location. Our study revealed significant differences between RCC, LCC and rectal cancers not only at somatic but also at proteomic level that may have therapeutic relevance in these highly complex and heterogeneous tumors.

Copyright information:

© 2018 The Author(s).

This is an Open Access work distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Export to EndNote