Provider perspectives on demand creation for maternal vaccines in Kenya.

• Authors: Irina Bergenfeld, Emory University; Stacy W. Nganga, Emory University; Courtni A. Andrews, Emory University; Vincent L. Fenimore, Emory University; Nancy A. Otieno, Kenya Medical Research Institute; Andrew D. Wilson, Emory University; Sandra S. Chaves, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Kenya Office, Nairobi, Kenya.; Jennifer Verani, Emory University; Mac-Alain Widdowson, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; Winnie N. Wairimu, Kenya Medical Research Institute; Susan N. Wandera, Kenya Medical Research Institute; Raphael O. Atito, Kenya Medical Research Institute; Maxwell O. Adero, Kenya Medical Research Institute; Paula M. Frew, Emory University; Saad Omer, Emory University; Fauzia Malik, Emory University
• Journal Title: Gates Open Research
• Volume: Volume 2
• Publisher: F1000Research | 2018-07-19, Pages 34-34
• Type of Work: Article | Final Publisher PDF
• Publisher DOI: http://doi.org/10.12688/gatesopenres.12833.1
• Subjects: Health Sciences, Public Health; Health Sciences, Immunology; Health Sciences, Epidemiology
• Keywords: Developing Countries; Health Care Providers; Kenya; Maternal Immunization; Maternal and Child Health

Abstract

Background. Expansion of maternal immunization, which offers some of the most effective protection against morbidity and mortality in pregnant women and neonates, requires broad acceptance by healthcare providers and their patients. We aimed to describe issues surrounding acceptance and demand creation for maternal vaccines in Kenya from a provider perspective. Methods. Nurses and clinical officers were recruited for semi-structured interviews covering resources for vaccine delivery, patient education, knowledge and attitudes surrounding maternal vaccines, and opportunities for demand creation for new vaccines. Interviews were conducted in English and Swahili, transcribed verbatim from audio recordings, and analyzed using codes developed from interview guide questions and emergent themes. Results. Providers expressed favorable attitudes about currently available maternal immunizations and introduction of additional vaccines, viewing themselves as primarily responsible for vaccine promotion and patient education.  The importance of educational resources for both patients and providers to maintain high levels of maternal immunization coverage was a common theme. Most identified barriers to vaccine acceptance and delivery were cultural and systematic in nature. Suggestions for improvement included improved patient and provider education, including material resources, and community engagement through religious and cultural leaders. Conclusions. The distribution of standardized, evidence-based print materials for patient education may reduce provider overwork and facilitate in-clinic efforts to inform women about maternal vaccines. Continuing education for providers should address communication surrounding current vaccines and those under consideration for introduction into routine schedules. Engagement of religious and community leaders, as well as male decision-makers in the household, will enhance future acceptance of maternal vaccines.