About this item:

85 Views | 137 Downloads

Author Notes:

Corresponding author: soson.jong@ucsf.edu

The contents of this manuscripts are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH or any other funders.

The authors would like to thank the many HIV-infected individuals who participated in the study.


Research Funding:

This project was supported by the International Nursing Network and NIH HIV/AIDS Nursing Care and Prevention Fellowship (T32NR007081).

Engagement with health care providers as a mediator between social capital and quality of life among a sample of people living with HIV in the United States: Path-analysis


Journal Title:

SSM - Population Health


Volume 3


, Pages 448-454

Type of Work:

Article | Final Publisher PDF


Background Social capital is “features of social organizations—networks, norms, and as trust that facilitate coordination and cooperation for mutual benefit”. People with high social capital have lower mortality and better health outcomes. Although utilization of social networks has grown, social capital continues to be a complex concept in relation to health promotion. This study examined 1) associations between social capital and quality of life (QoL), 2) factors of social capital leading to higher QoL among people living with HIV (PLWH), 3) role of health care providers (HCP) as a mediator between social capital and QoL. Methods This is a secondary analysis of the International Nursing HIV Network for HIV/AIDS Research. This cross-sectional study included 1673 PLWH from 11 research sites in the United States in 2010. Using path analysis, we examined the independent effect of social capital on QoL, and the mediating effect of PLWH engagement with HCP. Results The majority of participants were male (71.2%), and 45.7% were African American. Eighty-nine percent of the participants were on antiretroviral therapy. Social capital consisted of three factors — social connection, tolerance toward diversity, and community participation — explaining 87% of variance of social capital. Path analysis (RMSEA = 0, CFI = 1) found that social connection, followed by tolerance toward diversity, were the principal domain of social capital leading to better QoL (std. beta = 0.50, std. error = 0.64, p<.05). Social capital was positively associated with QoL (p<.05). About 11% of the protective effect of social capital on QoL was mediated by engagement with HCP (p<.05). Conclusions This study emphasizes importance of social connections and mediating role of HCP in improving QoL for PLWH. To develop social capital effectively, interventions should focus on strengthening PLWH's social connections and engagement to HCP.

Copyright information:

© 2017 The Authors

This is an Open Access work distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Creative Commons License

Export to EndNote