About this item:

966 Views | 837 Downloads

Author Notes:

Corresponding author E-mail vcorces@emory.edu

We thank Dr. Nicolas Gompel for the images of the Drosophila species shown in Figure 6B.

We thank Chunhui Hou for enlightening discussions, Naomi Takenaka for help with the ChIP-seq libraries, and the Corces lab for moral support.

We also thank the Genomic Services Lab at the HudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology for their help in performing Illumina sequencing of ChIP-seq samples.

The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Subject:

Research Funding:

Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health under award number R01GM035463 to V.G.C. and National Cancer Institute award number K01CA133106 to E.R.

The BEAF-32 insulator coordinates genome organization and function during the evolution of Drosophila species

Tools:

Journal Title:

Genome Research

Volume:

Volume 22, Number 11

Publisher:

, Pages 2199-2207

Type of Work:

Article | Final Publisher PDF

Abstract:

Understanding the relationship between genome organization and expression is central to understanding genome function. Closely apposed genes in a head-to-head orientation share the same upstream region and are likely to be coregulated. Here we identify the Drosophila BEAF-32 insulator as a cis regulatory element separating close head-to-head genes with different transcription regulation modes. We then compare the binding landscapes of the BEAF-32 insulator protein in four different Drosophila genomes and highlight the evolutionarily conserved presence of this protein between close adjacent genes. We find that changes in binding of BEAF-32 to sites in the genome of different Drosophila species correlate with alterations in genome organization caused by DNA rearrangements or genome size expansion. The cross-talk between BEAF-32 genomic distribution and genome organization contributes to new gene-expression profiles, which in turn translate into specific and distinct phenotypes. The results suggest a mechanism for the establishment of differences in transcription patterns during evolution.

Copyright information:

This article is distributed exclusively by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press for the first six months after the full-issue publication date (see http://genome.cshlp.org/site/misc/terms.xhtml). After six months, it is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License)

This is an Open Access work distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/).

Creative Commons License

Export to EndNote