About this item:

363 Views | 189 Downloads

Author Notes:

CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Thomas M. Atkinson, Ph.D., Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 641 Lexington Ave., 7th Floor, New York, NY 10022, USA. Phone: 646-888-0089. Fax: 212-888-2584. atkinsot@mskcc.org

The Department of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis at the National Cancer Institute provided selumetinib for the clinical trial (NCT01143402).

The Authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Subject:

Research Funding:

This project was sponsored by the Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program. Financial support was provided by the National Cancer Institute, the Conquer Cancer Foundation, Cycle for Survival, and the Fund for Opthalmic Knowledge, as well as a National Institutes of Health Support Grant (P30CA08748), which provides partial support for the Behavioral Research Methods Core Facility used in conducting this investigation

Keywords:

  • Science & Technology
  • Life Sciences & Biomedicine
  • Oncology
  • Patient-reported outcomes
  • Quality of life
  • Selumetinib
  • Neoplasms
  • Uveal melanoma
  • Adverse events
  • Clinical trials
  • COMMON TERMINOLOGY CRITERIA
  • FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT
  • CANCER-TREATMENT
  • OUTCOMES
  • THERAPY
  • CTCAE
  • PRO
  • CHEMOTHERAPY
  • ONCOLOGY
  • VERSION

Relationship between Physician-Adjudicated Adverse Events and Patient-Reported Health-Related Quality of Life in a Phase II Clinical Trial (NCT01143402) of Patients with Metastatic Uveal Melanoma

Show all authors Show less authors

Tools:

Journal Title:

Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology

Volume:

Volume 143, Number 3

Publisher:

, Pages 439-445

Type of Work:

Article | Post-print: After Peer Review

Abstract:

Clinical trials commonly use physician-adjudicated adverse event (AE) assessment via the common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) for decision-making. Patient-reported health-related quality of life (HRQoL) data are becoming more frequent in oncology; however, the relationship between physician-adjudicated AE assessment and HRQoL is understudied. Methods: Data from a phase II trial (clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT01143402) where patients with metastatic uveal melanoma were randomized to receive selumetinib, an oral MEK inhibitor, or chemotherapy were analyzed. Patients reported HRQoL at baseline, after 1 month, and end of treatment (n = 118), whereas physicians adjudicated AEs via CTCAE. Mean HRQoL scores were compared between patient randomization arms, as well as between those patients who did/did not receive dose modifications. Results: Ninety-four percent had a CTCAE grade ≥1 for at least one treatment-associated AE, with 18% undergoing dose modification due to toxicity. Mean HRQoL scores did not significantly differ at each of the three time points. Patient and physician-adjudicated reports of nausea were significantly correlated at the start (r = 0.31, p  <  0.01) and end of treatment (r = 0.42, p  <  0.05). There were no significant correlations between need for dose modification and HRQoL scores. Conclusions: Despite the high rate of physician-adjudicated AEs and need for dose modifications with selumetinib, patient-reported HRQoL was not impacted by treatment. Since HRQoL did not differ in the subgroup of patients who received dosage reductions due to AEs, patients may be willing to tolerate select AEs without dose modification (if medically appropriate). More research is needed to determine how to best integrate HRQoL data into clinical trial conduct.

Copyright information:

© 2016, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.

Export to EndNote