About this item:

347 Views | 383 Downloads

Author Notes:

E-mail: mdelea@emory.edu

The authors thank Geordie Woods and Yael Velleman for their helpful suggestions regarding revisions to the review protocol and the framing of recommendations.

The authors alone are responsible for the views expressed in this article, and they do not necessarily represent the views, decisions, or policies of the institutions with which they are affiliated.

Other than the personal contribution of AWS, who was a study investigator whilst employed by the World Health Organization (and is therefore a co-author of this article), the funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Subject:

Research Funding:

This review was supported by the World Health Organization (http://www.who.int/) through Registration 2015/578209-0. MCF and MGD received the funding.

Keywords:

  • Science & Technology
  • Life Sciences & Biomedicine
  • Infectious Diseases
  • Parasitology
  • Tropical Medicine
  • BEHAVIOR-CHANGE
  • DEVELOPING-COUNTRIES
  • RANDOMIZED-TRIAL
  • HEALTH BEHAVIORS
  • STRATEGY
  • IMPACT
  • FACE
  • TANZANIA
  • DISEASE
  • WATER

Journal Title:

PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Volume:

Volume 12, Number 1

Publisher:

, Pages e0006178-e0006178

Type of Work:

Article | Final Publisher PDF

Abstract:

Efforts are underway to scale-up the facial cleanliness and environmental improvement (F & E) components of the World Health Organization’s SAFE strategy for elimination of trachoma as a public health problem. Improving understanding of the F & E intervention landscape could inform advancements prior to scale-up, and lead to more effective and sustained behavior change. Methods/findings: We systematically searched for relevant grey literature published from January 1965 through August 2016. Publications were eligible for review if they described interventions addressing F & E in the context of trachoma elimination programs. Subsequent to screening, we mapped attributes of F & E interventions. We then employed three behavior change frameworks to synthesize mapped data and identify potential intervention gaps. We identified 27 documents meeting inclusion criteria. With the exception of some recent programming, F & E interventions have largely focused on intermediate and distal antecedents of behavior change. Evidence from our analyses suggests many interventions are not designed to address documented determinants of improved F & E practices. No reviewed documents endorsed inclusion of intervention components related to behavioral maintenance or resilience–factors critical for sustaining improved behaviors. Conclusions: If left unaddressed, identified gaps in intervention content may continue to challenge uptake and sustainability of improved F & E behaviors. Stakeholders designing and implementing trachoma elimination programs should review their F & E intervention content and delivery approaches with an eye toward improvement, including better alignment with established behavior change theories and empirical evidence. Implementation should move beyond information dissemination, and appropriately employ a variety of behavior change techniques to address more proximal influencers of change.

Copyright information:

© 2018 Delea et al.

This is an Open Access work distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 IGO License License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/).
Export to EndNote