About this item:

313 Views | 200 Downloads

Author Notes:

Correspondence: lsibley@emory.edu

See publication for full list of author contributions.

The authors would like to thank Allisyn Moran, Supria Madhavan, and Neal Brandes of USAID, and Danielle Charlet and Jim Sherry of University Research Co., LLC, for their vision, technical, and financial support to the six-country case study teams, including the Ethiopia team.

We also thank Abebe Gebremariam Gobezayehu, Aynalem H/Michael Frew, and Lelisse Tadesse of Emory University Ethiopia, as well as Abel Mekonnen, Yeshi Mulatu, Serawit Omer, and Getahun Shiferaw of the Consultancy for Social Development for their role in conducting the illness narratives and data coding.

We thank Daniel Gross for his careful editing and insightful comments.

Finally, we would like to express our gratitude to the women and families who participated in the illness narratives.

While participation sometimes elicited painful memories, the information shared will help to improve our understanding and addressing of factors that facilitate and impede appropriate care-seeking for others who, in the future, may be faced with complications of pregnancy and childbirth.

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Subject:

Research Funding:

This study and publication were made possible through funding from the US Agency for International Development under Translating Research into Action, cooperative agreement no. GHS-A-00-09-00015-00 through University Research Co., LLC. Both USAID and University Research Co., LLC, contributed to the overall six-country study design and protocol, development and standardization of the illness narrative guide and procedures, and organized data analysis and writing workshops to support the six-country teams.

The MaNHEP project was made possible through funding by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. The views expressed in this manuscript are those of the authors.

The views expressed in this manuscript are those of the authors.

Keywords:

  • Science & Technology
  • Life Sciences & Biomedicine
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Public, Environmental & Occupational Health
  • Environmental Sciences & Ecology
  • Illness recognition
  • Care-seeking
  • Maternal and newborn complications
  • Community-oriented interventions
  • MORTALITY
  • OUTCOMES
  • BELIEFS

Appropriateness and timeliness of care-seeking for complications of pregnancy and childbirth in rural Ethiopia: a case study of the Maternal and Newborn Health in Ethiopia Partnership

Tools:

Journal Title:

Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition

Volume:

Volume 36, Number Suppl 1

Publisher:

, Pages 50-50

Type of Work:

Article | Final Publisher PDF

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: In 2014, USAID and University Research Co., LLC, initiated a new project under the broader Translating Research into Action portfolio of projects. This new project was entitled Systematic Documentation of Illness Recognition and Appropriate Care Seeking for Maternal and Newborn Complications. This project used a common protocol involving descriptive mixed-methods case studies of community projects in six low- and middle-income countries, including Ethiopia. In this paper, we present the Maternal and Newborn Health in Ethiopia Partnership (MaNHEP) case study. METHODS: Methods included secondary analysis of data from MaNHEP's 2010 baseline and 2012 end line surveys, health program inventory and facility mapping to contextualize care-seeking, and illness narratives to identify factors influencing illness recognition and care-seeking. Analyses used descriptive statistics, bivariate tests, multivariate logistic regression, and thematic content analysis. RESULTS: Maternal illness awareness increased between 2010 and 2012 for major obstetric complications. In 2012, 45% of women who experienced a major complication sought biomedical care. Factors associated with care-seeking were MaNHEP CMNH Family Meetings, health facility birth, birth with a skilled provider, or health extension worker. Between 2012 and 2014, the Ministry of Health introduced nationwide initiatives including performance review, ambulance service, increased posting of midwives, pregnant women's conferences, user-friendly services, and maternal death surveillance. By 2014, most facilities were able to provide emergency obstetric and newborn care. Yet in 2014, biomedical care-seeking for perceived maternal illness occurred more often compared with care-seeking for newborn illness-a difference notable in cases in which the mother or newborn died. Most families sought care within 1 day of illness recognition. Facilitating factors were health extension worker advice and ability to refer upward, and health facility proximity; impeding factors were time of day, weather, road conditions, distance, poor cell phone connectivity (to call for an ambulance), lack of transportation or money for transport, perceived spiritual or physical vulnerability of the mother and newborn and associated culturally determined postnatal restrictions on the mother or newborn's movement outside of the home, and preference for traditional care. Some families sought care despite disrespectful, poor quality care. CONCLUSIONS: Improvements in illness recognition and care-seeking observed during MaNHEP have been reinforced since that time and appear to be successful. There is still need for a concerted effort focusing on reducing identified barriers, improve quality of care and provider counseling, and contextualize messaging behavior change communications and provider counseling.

Copyright information:

© The Author(s). 2017

This is an Open Access work distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Export to EndNote