About this item:

764 Views | 344 Downloads

Author Notes:

Corresponding author at: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road, MS C-25, Atlanta, GA 30329, USA. E-mail address: ruth.linkgelles@cdc.hhs.gov (R. Link-Gelles).

We acknowledge the following individuals for their contributions to the establishment and maintenance of the ABCs system and expanded surveillance areas.

California Emerging Infections Program: Susan Brooks, Hallie Randel. Colorado Emerging Infections Program: Benjamin White, Deborah Aragon, Meghan Barnes, Jennifer Sadlowski.

Connecticut Emerging Infections Program: Matt Cartter, Carmen Marquez, Michelle Wilson.

Georgia Emerging Infections Program: Sasha Harb, Nicole Romero, Stephanie Thomas, Amy Tunali, Wendy Baughman.

Maryland Emerging Infections Program: Joanne Benton, Terresa Carter, Rosemary Hollick, Kim Holmes, Andrea Riner, Kathleen Shutt, Catherine Williams.

Minnesota Emerging Infections Program: David Boxrud, Larry Carroll, Kathy Como-Sabetti, Richard Danila, Ginny Dobbins, Liz Horn, Catherine Lexau, Kerry MacInnes, Megan Sukalski, Billie Juni.

New Mexico Emerging Infections Program: Kathy Angeles, Lisa Butler, Sarah Khanlian, Robert Mansmann, Megin Nichols, Sarah Shrum.

New York Emerging Infections Program: Suzanne McGuire, Sal Currenti, Eva Pradhan, Jessica Nadeau, Rachel Wester, Kathryn Woodworth.

Oregon Emerging Infections Program: Mark Schmidt, Jamie Thompson, Tasha Poissant, Keenan Williamson.

Tennessee Emerging Infections Program: Brenda Barnes, Karen Leib, Katie Dyer, Lura McKnight, Tiffanie Markus.

Los Angeles Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity Site: Christine Benjamin, Nicole Green, Anali Gutierrez, David Jensen, Annelise Lupica, Laurene Mascola, Olamide Thomas, Christine Wigen.

New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene: Sarah Borderud, Katherine Lawrence, Orin Forde, Andrea Farnham, Ifeoma Ezeoke.

Utah Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity Site: Jonathan Anderson, Susan Mottice, Kristina Russell, and Amanda Whipple.

CDC: Tamara Pilishvili, Ryan Gierke, Karrie-Ann Toews, Emily Weston, Londell McGlone, Gayle Langley, Bernard Beall, Delois Jackson, Joy Rivers, Logan Sherwood, Hollis Walker.

The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Dr. Lynfield and Ms. Holtzman report grants from Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, during the conduct of the study.

In addition, Dr. Lynfield is an editor for a book on Infectious Disease Surveillance published by Blackwell-Wiley (royalty money donated to Minnesota Department of Health) during the conduct of the study.

Dr. Schaffner reports personal fees from Merck, Pfizer, the Cleveland Clinic, and Novavax outside the submitted work.

For all other authors, we declare that we have no conflicts of interest.

Subjects:

Research Funding:

This work was supported by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Keywords:

  • Matched case-control
  • PCV13
  • Pneumococcal vaccine
  • Pneumococcus
  • Socioeconomic status
  • Vaccine effectiveness

Bias with respect to socioeconomic status: A closer look at zip code matching in a pneumococcal vaccine effectiveness study

Show all authors Show less authors

Tools:

Journal Title:

SSM - Population Health

Volume:

Volume 2

Publisher:

, Pages 587-594

Type of Work:

Article | Final Publisher PDF

Abstract:

In 2010, 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13) was introduced in the US for prevention of invasive pneumococcal disease in children. Individual-level socioeconomic status (SES) is a potential confounder of the estimated effectiveness of PCV13 and is often controlled for in observational studies using zip code as a proxy. We assessed the utility of zip code matching for control of SES in a post-licensure evaluation of the effectiveness of PCV13 (calculated as [1-matched odds ratio] *100). We used a directed acyclic graph to identify subsets of confounders and collected SES variables from birth certificates, geocoding, a parent interview, and follow-up with medical providers. Cases tended to be more affluent than eligible controls (for example, 48.3% of cases had private insurance vs. 44.6% of eligible controls), but less affluent than enrolled controls (52.9% of whom had private insurance). Control of confounding subsets, however, did not result in a meaningful change in estimated vaccine effectiveness (original estimate: 85.1%, 95% CI 74.8–91.9%; adjusted estimate: 82.5%, 95% CI 65.6–91.1%). In the context of a post-licensure vaccine effectiveness study, zip code appears to be an adequate, though not perfect, proxy for individual SES.

Copyright information:

© 2016

This is an Open Access work distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Creative Commons License

Export to EndNote