About this item:

377 Views | 519 Downloads

Author Notes:

Corresponding author: Anna Woodbury, Anna.Woodbury@va.gov

Lynn Marie Fraser reviewed all notes and procedural details regarding the cases and wrote the majority of the clinical case report under the supervision of Dr. Woodbury.

Anna Woodbury saw and examined the patients, documented details in progress notes, and provided guidance to Dr. Fraser. She also personally contributed to much of the discussion section regarding the mechanisms of PENFS action in these patients.

We are grateful to the patients and caregivers for their participation.

Written informed consent for publication of their clinical details was obtained from the patients.

No competing interests were disclosed.

The authors have no conflicts of interest and received no monetary funding from any sources to perform this research.

Military Field Stimulators used for the two patients in these cases were provided free of charge from the manufacturer.

Subject:

Research Funding:

The author(s) declared that no grants were involved in supporting this work.

Keywords:

  • Percutaneous electrical neural stimulation
  • Vagal stimulation
  • Fibromyalgia
  • Complex regional pain syndrome
  • Central pain

Case report: Percutaneous electrical neural field stimulation in two cases of sympathetically-mediated pain

Tools:

Journal Title:

F1000Research

Volume:

Volume 6

Publisher:

, Pages 920-920

Type of Work:

Article | Final Publisher PDF

Abstract:

Background: Fibromyalgia and complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) are both chronic pain syndromes with pathophysiologic mechanisms related to autonomic nervous system dysregulation and central sensitization. Both syndromes are considered difficult to treat with conventional pain therapies. Case presentations: Here we describe a female veteran with fibromyalgia and a male veteran with CRPS, both of whom failed multiple pharmacologic, physical and psychological therapies for pain, but responded to percutaneous electrical neural field stimulation (PENFS) targeted at the auricular branches of the cranial nerves. Discussion: While PENFS applied to the body has been previously described for treatment of localized pain, PENFS effects on cranial nerve branches of the ear is not well-known, particularly when used for regional and full-body pain syndromes such as those described here. PENFS of the ear is a minimally-invasive, non-pharmacologic therapy that could lead to improved quality of life and decreased reliance on medication. However, further research is needed to guide clinical application, particularly in complex pain patients.

Copyright information:

© 2017 Fraser L and Woodbury A.

This is an Open Access work distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Export to EndNote