About this item:

505 Views | 796 Downloads

Author Notes:

Corresponding author. jmpluth@lbl.gov (J.M. Pluth)

The authors wish to thank laboratory members and staff who have assisted in the cited work, including Tatiana Kovyrshina for QC and normalization of the array data.

Special thanks to the scientists and staff at NASA Space Radiation Laboratory and Medical at Brookhaven National Laboratory, including Drs. Adam Rusek, Chiara LaTessa, and Peter Guida.

We thank Dr. Stan Curtis for helpful discussions.

Lastly, we would like to acknowledge the visionary efforts of Dr. Francis Cucinotta who initiated the VSBM groups for risk modeling, and has widely contributed and supported numerous research efforts in space radiation biology.

We acknowledge that there is a large body of work that has been completed in this area and due to space limitations we could not discuss it in its entirety.

Thus, we apologize in advance for important works that we were unable to cite in the current review.

Subjects:

Research Funding:

This work was supported by National Aeronautics and Space Administration NNX13AD57G, and NNX15AE06G (to A. Asaithamby); National Aeronautics and Space Administration NNJ09HC64I and the Low Dose Scientific Focus Area, United States Department of Energy DE-AC02-05CH11231 (to S.V. Costes); National Aeronautics and Space Administration NNX15AD63G (to W. Dynan), NASA Specialized Center of Research (NSCOR) NNX11AC30G (to Emory University – W. Dynan, P. Doetsch, and E. Werner); National Aeronautics and Space Administration Grants NNX13AJ01G, NNX11AK26G, and NSCOR NNJ06HA28G (to L. Hlatky); National Aeronautics and Space Administration NAS9-0.2078 (to Y. Kidane, I. Plante, and A. Ponomarev); National Aeronautics and Space Administration NNJ12HB88I (to A. Kronenberg); National Aeronautics and Space Administration NNX11AO89G and NNX13AD74G (to M. Naidu); National Aeronautics and Space Administration NNX12AO52A (to Tatiana Kovyrshina, M.S. who performed QC, normalization, and batch-effect removal of expression arrays used for pathway activation for analysis by L. Peterson).

National Aeronautics and Space Administration NNJ12HD071 and NNJ13HA96I (to J. Pluth); Dose Scientific Focus Area, US Department of Energy DE-AI02-10ER64969 – J. Saha (to F. Cucinotta); Low Dose Scientific Focus Area, US Department of Energy DE-AC0205CH11231 (to A.Snijders).

Keywords:

  • Biomarkers
  • Cancer risk
  • HZE
  • Modeling
  • Space radiation

Evaluating biomarkers to model cancer risk post cosmic ray exposure

Tools:

Journal Title:

Life Sciences and Space Research

Volume:

Volume 9

Publisher:

, Pages 19-47

Type of Work:

Article | Final Publisher PDF

Abstract:

Robust predictive models are essential to manage the risk of radiation-induced carcinogenesis. Chronic exposure to cosmic rays in the context of the complex deep space environment may place astronauts at high cancer risk. To estimate this risk, it is critical to understand how radiation-induced cellular stress impacts cell fate decisions and how this in turn alters the risk of carcinogenesis. Exposure to the heavy ion component of cosmic rays triggers a multitude of cellular changes, depending on the rate of exposure, the type of damage incurred and individual susceptibility. Heterogeneity in dose, dose rate, radiation quality, energy and particle flux contribute to the complexity of risk assessment. To unravel the impact of each of these factors, it is critical to identify sensitive biomarkers that can serve as inputs for robust modeling of individual risk of cancer or other long-term health consequences of exposure. Limitations in sensitivity of biomarkers to dose and dose rate, and the complexity of longitudinal monitoring, are some of the factors that increase uncertainties in the output from risk prediction models. Here, we critically evaluate candidate early and late biomarkers of radiation exposure and discuss their usefulness in predicting cell fate decisions. Some of the biomarkers we have reviewed include complex clustered DNA damage, persistent DNA repair foci, reactive oxygen species, chromosome aberrations and inflammation. Other biomarkers discussed, often assayed for at longer points post exposure, include mutations, chromosome aberrations, reactive oxygen species and telomere length changes. We discuss the relationship of biomarkers to different potential cell fates, including proliferation, apoptosis, senescence, and loss of stemness, which can propagate genomic instability and alter tissue composition and the underlying mRNA signatures that contribute to cell fate decisions. Our goal is to highlight factors that are important in choosing biomarkers and to evaluate the potential for biomarkers to inform models of post exposure cancer risk. Because cellular stress response pathways to space radiation and environmental carcinogens share common nodes, biomarker-driven risk models may be broadly applicable for estimating risks for other carcinogens.

Copyright information:

© 2016 The Committee on Space Research (COSPAR)

This is an Open Access work distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Creative Commons License

Export to EndNote