About this item:

719 Views | 416 Downloads

Author Notes:

Corresponding Authors: Mazda Jenab, International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC-WHO), 150 cours Albert Thomas, 69372 Lyon Cedex 08, France. Phone: 33-4-72-73-80-82; Fax: 33-4-72-73-83-61; E-mail: jenabm@iarc.fr; and W.R. Bruce, Department of Nutritional Sciences, University of Toronto, 150 College Street, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3E2, Canada. Phone: 1-416-978-5425; Fax: 1-416-978-5882; E-mail: wrbruce@utoronto.ca

See publication for full list of author contributions.

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

The authors declare that they have no competing or conflict of interests.

Subjects:

Research Funding:

This work was funded by Wereld Kanker Onderzoek Fonds as part of the World Cancer Research Fund (WCRF) International Regular Grant Programme (grant number 2010-251; PI: M. Jenab).

The coordination of EPIC is financially supported by the European Commission (DG-SANCO) and the International Agency for Research on Cancer.

The national cohorts are supported by Danish Cancer Society (Denmark); Ligue Contre le Cancer, Institut Gustave Roussy, Mutuelle Générale de l’Education Nationale, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) (France); Deutsche Krebshilfe, Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum and Federal Ministry of Education and Research (Germany); the Hellenic Health Foundation (Greece); Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro-AIRC-Italy and National Research Council (Italy); Dutch Ministry of Public Health, Welfare and Sports (VWS), Netherlands Cancer Registry (NKR), LK Research Funds, Dutch Prevention Funds, Dutch ZON (Zorg Onderzoek Nederland), World Cancer Research Fund (WCRF), Statistics Netherlands (The Netherlands); Nordic Centre of Excellence programme on Food, Nutrition and Health. (Norway); Health Research Fund (FIS), PI13/00061 to Granada), Regional Governments of Andalucía, Asturias, Basque Country, Murcia (no. 6236) and Navarra, ISCIII RETIC (RD06/0020) (Spain); Swedish Cancer Society, Swedish Scientific Council and County Councils of Skåne and Västerbotten (Sweden); Cancer Research UK (14136 to EPIC-Norfolk; C570/A16491 to EPIC-Oxford), Medical Research Council (1000143 to EPIC-Norfolk) (United Kingdom).

Keywords:

  • Science & Technology
  • Life Sciences & Biomedicine
  • Oncology
  • Public, Environmental & Occupational Health
  • C-REACTIVE PROTEIN
  • IMMUNE-RESPONSE
  • BACTERIAL FLAGELLIN
  • BARRIER DEFECTS
  • TEXTILE WORKERS
  • CROHNS-DISEASE
  • GUT MICROBIOTA
  • RECTAL-CANCER
  • T-CELLS
  • COLON
  • Endotoxins
  • Flagellin
  • Colorectal cancer
  • European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC)

Serum Endotoxins and Flagellin and Risk of Colorectal Cancer in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) Cohort

Show all authors Show less authors

Tools:

Journal Title:

Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers and Prevention

Volume:

Volume 25, Number 2

Publisher:

, Pages 291-301

Type of Work:

Article | Final Publisher PDF

Abstract:

Background: Chronic inflammation and oxidative stress are thought to be involved in colorectal cancer development. These processes may contribute to leakage of bacterial products, such as lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and flagellin, across the gut barrier. The objective of this study, nested within a prospective cohort, was to examine associations between circulating LPS and flagellin serum antibody levels and colorectal cancer risk. Methods: A total of 1,065 incident colorectal cancer cases (colon, n = 667; rectal, n = 398) were matched (1:1) to control subjects. Serum flagellin- and LPS-specific IgA and IgG levels were quantitated by ELISA. Multivariable conditional logistic regression models were used to calculate ORs and 95% confidence intervals (CI), adjusting for multiple relevant confouding factors. Results: Overall, elevated anti-LPS and anti-flagellin biomarker levels were not associated with colorectal cancer risk. After testing potential interactions by various factors relevant for colorectal cancer risk and anti-LPS and anti-flagellin, sex was identified as a statistically significant interaction factor (Pinteraction < 0.05 for all the biomarkers). Analyses stratified by sex showed a statistically significant positive colorectal cancer risk association for men (fully-adjusted OR for highest vs. lowest quartile for total anti- LPS flagellin, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.10-2.51; Ptrend, 0.049), whereas a borderline statistically significant inverse association was observed for women (fully-adjusted OR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.47- 1.02; Ptrend, 0.18). Conclusion: In this prospective study on European populations, we found bacterial exposure levels to be positively associated to colorectal cancer risk among men, whereas in women, a possible inverse association may exist. Impact: Further studies are warranted to better clarify these preliminary observations.

Copyright information:

© 2016 American Association for Cancer Research.

Export to EndNote