About this item:

740 Views | 820 Downloads

Author Notes:

Correspondence: A. M. Harris, MD, MPH, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Rd NE, MS G-37, Atlanta, GA 30329 amharris@cdc.gov

See publication for full list of author contributions.

We thank the children and families who graciously consented to participate in the Etiology of Pneumonia in the Community (EPIC) study.

We also thank Dr. Chris Stockmann (University of Utah Health Services Center) for his contributions to this study.

Potential conflicts of interest: W. H. S. serves on scientific advisory boards for BioFire Diagnostics and Venaxis, Inc., consults for Abbott Point of Care, and received research funding from Pfizer, ThermoFisher, and BioMerieux.

E. J. A. received research funding from Novavax and research funding and editorial assistance from MedImmune, and he consults for AbbVie. R. G. W. consults with Accelerate Diagnostics and GenMark, and his institution received grants from bioMerieux and Pfizer.

A. T. P. received research funding from BioFire Diagnostics. C. G. G. has served as a consultant for Pfizer Inc.

All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest.

Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed.

The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Research Funding:

The EPIC study was supported by the Influenza Division in the National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention through cooperative agreements with each study site and was based on a competitive research funding opportunity.

W. H. S. was supported in part by K23GM110469 from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences.

C. G. G. was supported in part by R01AG043471 from the National Institute on Aging.

D. J. W. was supported in part by K23AI104779 from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.

Keywords:

  • Pneumonia
  • antibiotic stewardship
  • antibiotic use
  • bacterial disease
  • pneumonia diagnostics

Influence of Antibiotics on the Detection of Bacteria by Culture-Based and Culture-Independent Diagnostic Tests in Patients Hospitalized With Community-Acquired Pneumonia.

Show all authors Show less authors

Tools:

Journal Title:

Open Forum Infectious Diseases

Volume:

Volume 4, Number 1

Publisher:

, Pages ofx014-ofx014

Type of Work:

Article | Final Publisher PDF

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: Specimens collected after antibiotic exposure may reduce culture-based bacterial detections. The impact on culture-independent diagnostic tests is unclear. We assessed the effect of antibiotic exposure on both of these test results among patients hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). METHODS: Culture-based bacterial testing included blood cultures and high-quality sputum or endotracheal tube (ET) aspirates; culture-independent testing included urinary antigen testing (adults) for Streptococcus pneumoniae and Legionella pneumophila and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) on nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal (NP/OP) swabs for Mycoplasma pneumoniae and Chlamydia pneumoniae. The proportion of bacterial detections was compared between specimens collected before and after either any antibiotic exposure (prehospital and/or inpatient) or only prehospital antibiotics and increasing time after initiation of inpatient antibiotics. RESULTS: Of 4678 CAP patients, 4383 (94%) received antibiotics: 3712 (85%) only inpatient, 642 (15%) both inpatient and prehospital, and 29 (<1%) only prehospital. There were more bacterial detections in specimens collected before antibiotics for blood cultures (5.2% vs 2.6%; P < .01) and sputum/ET cultures (50.0% vs 26.8%; P < .01) but not urine antigen (7.0% vs 5.7%; P = .53) or NP/OP PCR (6.7% vs 5.4%; P = .31). For all diagnostic testing, bacterial detections declined with increasing time between inpatient antibiotic administration and specimen collection. CONCLUSIONS: Bacteria were less frequently detected in culture-based tests collected after antibiotics and in culture-independent tests that had longer intervals between antibiotic exposure and specimen collection. Bacterial yield could improve if specimens were collected promptly, preferably before antibiotics, providing data for improved antibiotic selection.

Copyright information:

Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America 2017. This work is written by (a) US Government employee(s) and is in the public domain in the US.

Export to EndNote