About this item:

644 Views | 543 Downloads

Author Notes:

Address correspondence to P. Dadvand, CREAL, Barcelona Biomedical Research Park, Dr. Aiguader, 88, 08003 Barcelona, Spain. Telephone: 34 93 214 7317. E-mail: pdadvand@creal.cat

We are grateful to D. Martinez, J. Grellier, and P. Grillo for their contributions to the analytical parts of the paper.

The authors declare they have no actual or potential competing financial interests.

Subjects:

Research Funding:

This project was supported by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency under contract number EP-W-05-022 and by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (R01ES016317, R01ES019587).

For the Vancouver analysis, the British Columbia (BC) Ministry of Health, the BC Vital Statistics Agency, and the BC Reproductive Care Program approved access to and use of the data facilitated by Population Data BC.

The U.K. PAMPER study was supported by the Wellcome Trust (grant 072465/Z/03/Z). P.D. is funded by a Juan de la Cierva fellowship (JCI-2011-09937) awarded by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation.

Keywords:

  • Science & Technology
  • Life Sciences & Biomedicine
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Public, Environmental & Occupational Health
  • Toxicology
  • Environmental Sciences & Ecology
  • ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
  • PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH, SCI
  • air pollution
  • fetal growth
  • heterogeneity
  • ICAPPO
  • low birth weight
  • meta-analysis
  • meta-regression
  • multi-center study
  • particulate matter
  • pregnancy
  • PREGNANCY OUTCOMES
  • METAANALYSIS
  • RISK
  • INFANTS
  • HEALTH

Maternal Exposure to Particulate Air Pollution and Term Birth Weight: A Multi-Country Evaluation of Effect and Heterogeneity

Show all authors Show less authors

Tools:

Journal Title:

Environmental Health Perspectives

Volume:

Volume 121, Number 3

Publisher:

, Pages 367-373

Type of Work:

Article | Final Publisher PDF

Abstract:

Background: A growing body of evidence has associated maternal exposure to air pollution with adverse effects on fetal growth; however, the existing literature is inconsistent. Objectives: We aimed to quantify the association between maternal exposure to particulate air pollution and term birth weight and low birth weight (LBW) across 14 centers from 9 countries, and to explore the influence of site characteristics and exposure assessment methods on between-center heterogeneity in this association. Methods: Using a common analytical protocol, International Collaboration on Air Pollution and Pregnancy Outcomes (ICAPPO) centers generated effect estimates for term LBW and continuous birth weight associated with PM10 and PM2.5 (particulate matter ≤ 10 and 2.5 μm). We used meta-analysis to combine the estimates of effect across centers (~ 3 million births) and used meta-regression to evaluate the influence of center characteristics and exposure assessment methods on between-center heterogeneity in reported effect estimates. Results: In random-effects meta-analyses, term LBW was positively associated with a 10-μg/m3 increase in PM10 [odds ratio (OR) = 1.03; 95% CI: 1.01, 1.05] and PM2.5 (OR = 1.10; 95% CI: 1.03, 1.18) exposure during the entire pregnancy, adjusted for maternal socioeconomic status. A 10-μg/m3 increase in PM10 exposure was also negatively associated with term birth weight as a continuous outcome in the fully adjusted random-effects meta-analyses (-8.9 g; 95% CI: -13.2, -4.6 g). Meta-regressions revealed that centers with higher median PM2.5 levels and PM2.5:PM10 ratios, and centers that used a temporal exposure assessment (compared with spatiotemporal), tended to report stronger associations. Conclusion: Maternal exposure to particulate pollution was associated with LBW at term across study populations. We detected three site characteristics and aspects of exposure assessment methodology that appeared to contribute to the variation in associations reported by centers.

Copyright information:

Publication of EHP lies in the public domain and is therefore without copyright. All text from EHP may be reprinted freely. Use of materials published in EHP should be acknowledged (for example, ?Reproduced with permission from Environmental Health Perspectives?); pertinent reference information should be provided for the article from which the material was reproduced. Articles from EHP, especially the News section, may contain photographs or illustrations copyrighted by other commercial organizations or individuals that may not be used without obtaining prior approval from the holder of the copyright.

Export to EndNote