About this item:

237 Views | 223 Downloads

Author Notes:

*

MP and MI planned the study design, DE and FR supervised data collection, MI performed data analysis.

All authors contributed in writing the paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Subjects:

Research Funding:

This study was not supported financially by any grants.

Keywords:

  • Science & Technology
  • Life Sciences & Biomedicine
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Neurosciences
  • Neurosciences & Neurology
  • Medication overuse headache
  • Stagnation
  • Depression
  • Structural equation modeling
  • INTERNATIONAL NEUROPSYCHIATRIC INTERVIEW
  • PSYCHIATRIC COMORBIDITY
  • PERCEIVED DISABILITY
  • DSM-IV
  • DEPRESSION
  • EPIDEMIOLOGY
  • PREVALENCE
  • VALIDATION
  • ANXIETY
  • CARE

Psychometric properties of the stagnation scale in medication overuse headache patients

Tools:

Journal Title:

Journal of Headache and Pain

Volume:

Volume 16, Number 1

Publisher:

, Pages 1052-1052

Type of Work:

Article | Final Publisher PDF

Abstract:

Background: Medication-overuse headache (MOH) is often comorbid with emotional disturbances, contributing to poorer outcomes. The aims of the present study were to assess the psychometric properties of the Stagnation Scale in a sample of MOH patients, and to compare two factor models: a three-factor model reported in previous studies and a proposed bi-factor model. Methods: Consecutive adult outpatients (N = 310) admitted to the Regional Referral Headache Centre of the Sant’Andrea Hospital in Rome (Italy) were administered the Stagnation Scale and two questionnaires measuring depression and perceived disability. Results: The original three-factor model demonstrated an adequate fit to the data (χ<sup>2</sup> <inf>101</inf> = 238.70; p < 0.001; Root Mean Square Error of Approximation [RMSEA] = 0.07; 90% CI of RMSEA = 0.06 / 0.08; Comparative Fit Index [CFI] = 0.98; Weighted Root Mean Square Residual [WRMR] = 0.75). However, the bi-factor model had a comparable or even better fit, with a RMSEA of 0.05 (90% CI: 0.04 / 0.07), providing strong evidence for an absolute fit to the data (χ<sup>2</sup> <inf>88</inf> = 161.43; p < 0.001; RMSEA = 0.05; 90% CI of RMSEA = 0.04 / 0.07; CFI = 0.99; WRMR = 0.56). The stagnation general factor and all the group factors correlated significantly and positively with convergent measures. Conclusions: There is support for the use of the Stagnation Scale in MOH patients, with the goal of better understanding the role of psychological factors in the evolution and course of the disorder.

Copyright information:

© 2015, Innamorati et al.; licensee Springer.

This is an Open Access work distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Export to EndNote