About this item:

682 Views | 375 Downloads

Author Notes:

Corresponding author: Kathleen Helen Krause, Department of Behavioral Sciences and Health Education, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, 1518 Clifton Road NE, GCR 430, Atlanta, GA 30322, Tel.: 860.391.5844, Fax: 404.727.1369, k.h.krause@emory.edu.

The authors thank the Center for Creative Initiatives in Health and Population (CCIHP) and the My Hao district health authority for their exceptional partnerships; CCIHP collaborators Dr. Hoang Tu Anh, Dr. Trang Hung Minh, Ms. Vu Song Ha, and Ms. Quach Trang; and the study participants for their time, effort, and dedication to this project.

Subjects:

Research Funding:

This work was supported by National Institutes of Health research grant 5R21HD067834-01/02 (PIs K.M.Y. and S.R.S.) and the Hubert Department of Global Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University.

Keywords:

  • Social Sciences
  • Criminology & Penology
  • Family Studies
  • Psychology, Applied
  • Psychology
  • perceptions of domestic violence
  • domestic violence
  • cultural contexts
  • INTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE
  • WIFE ABUSE
  • INTERPARENTAL VIOLENCE
  • CHILDHOOD EXPERIENCES
  • GENDER-DIFFERENCES
  • MARRIED-WOMEN

Why Do Women Justify Violence Against Wives More Often Than Do Men in Vietnam?

Tools:

Journal Title:

Journal of Interpersonal Violence

Volume:

Volume 31, Number 19

Publisher:

, Pages 3150-3173

Type of Work:

Article | Post-print: After Peer Review

Abstract:

Background: Intimate partner violence (IPV) harms the health of women and their children. In Vietnam, 31% of women report lifetime exposure to physical IPV, and surprisingly, women justify physical IPV against wives more often than do men. Objective: We compare men’s and women’s rates of finding good reason for wife hitting and assess whether differences in childhood experiences and resources and constraints in adulthood account for observed differences. Methods: Probability samples of married men (N = 522) and women (N = 533) were surveyed in Vietnam. Ordered logit models assessed the proportional odds for women versus men of finding more “good reasons” to hit a wife (never, 1–3 situations, 4–6 situations). Results: In all situations, women found good reason to hit a wife more often than did men. The unadjusted odds for women versus men of reporting more good reasons to hit a wife were 6.55 (95% CI 4.82 – 8.91). This gap disappeared in adjusted models that included significant interactions of gender with age, number of children ever born, and experience of physical IPV as an adult. Discussion: Having children was associated with justifying wife hitting among women but not men. Exposure to IPV in adulthood was associated with justifying wife hitting among men but was negatively associated with justification of IPV among women. Further study of the gendered effects of resources and constraints in adulthood on attitudes about IPV against women will clarify women’s more frequent reporting than men’s that IPV against women is justified.

Copyright information:

© 2016 SAGE Publications.

Export to EndNote