About this item:

748 Views | 887 Downloads

Author Notes:

This project is the result of an international collaborative effort by a large group of institutional and researcher members of the C-Model Development Group.

JPS conceptualised the analysis plan and drafted the report on behalf of the C-Model Development group.

JPS, APB, AD, BM, CMGP, CD-T, EOP, EO, GT, GC, HK, JZ, JGC, JPV, KJ, MCL, MG, NM, NL, OTO, OT, PL, RM, SQ, AMG: Made substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work, or the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data for the work.

All authors revised the work critically; gave final approval of the version to be published; agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

LO-C led the development of the electronic calculator. All members of the C-Model Development Group read and approved the final manuscript.

The HRP specialist panel (WHO scientific staff and external, independent researchers) on epidemiological research reviewed and approved the WHO MCS study protocol for technical content. The WHO MCS study was approved by the WHO ethical review committee and the relevant ethical clearance mechanisms in all countries.

The relevant ethical and administrative clearances for analysis of databases that provided data for C-Model building and testing were obtained.

We thank the WHO Multicountry Survey on Maternal and Newborn Health Research Network, the International Network of Obstetric Survey Systems and all other organisations that joined this project.

We are also thankful to Dr Khalid Khan (UK) and Dr Javier Zamora (Spain), participants of the ‘WHO Caesarean Section Rates for Best Outcomes Methodological Working Group’, for their input.

There was no specific financial support for this study.

Declaration of interests: None declared.

Research Funding:

This project was supported through the in-kind collaboration of the many institutions that host the members of the C-Model development group.

Keywords:

  • Science & Technology
  • Life Sciences & Biomedicine
  • Obstetrics & Gynecology
  • Benchmarking
  • caesarean delivery rates
  • caesarean section rates
  • logistic regression
  • METAANALYSIS
  • DELIVERY

A global reference for caesarean section rates (C-Model): a multicountry cross-sectional study

Show all authors Show less authors

Tools:

Journal Title:

BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Volume:

Volume 123, Number 3

Publisher:

, Pages 427-436

Type of Work:

Article | Final Publisher PDF

Abstract:

Objective To generate a global reference for caesarean section (CS) rates at health facilities. Design Cross-sectional study. Setting Health facilities from 43 countries. Population/Sample Thirty eight thousand three hundred and twenty-four women giving birth from 22 countries for model building and 10 045 875 women giving birth from 43 countries for model testing. Methods We hypothesised that mathematical models could determine the relationship between clinical-obstetric characteristics and CS. These models generated probabilities of CS that could be compared with the observed CS rates. We devised a three-step approach to generate the global benchmark of CS rates at health facilities: creation of a multi-country reference population, building mathematical models, and testing these models. Main outcome measures Area under the ROC curves, diagnostic odds ratio, expected CS rate, observed CS rate. Results According to the different versions of the model, areas under the ROC curves suggested a good discriminatory capacity of C-Model, with summary estimates ranging from 0.832 to 0.844. The C-Model was able to generate expected CS rates adjusted for the case-mix of the obstetric population. We have also prepared an e-calculator to facilitate use of C-Model (www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/maternal-perinatal-health/c-model/en/). Conclusions This article describes the development of a global reference for CS rates. Based on maternal characteristics, this tool was able to generate an individualised expected CS rate for health facilities or groups of health facilities. With C-Model, obstetric teams, health system managers, health facilities, health insurance companies, and governments can produce a customised reference CS rate for assessing use (and overuse) of CS. Tweetable abstract The C-Model provides a customized benchmark for caesarean section rates in health facilities and systems.

Copyright information:

© 2015 World Health Organization; licensed by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.

This is an Open Access work distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 IGO License License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/).
Export to EndNote