About this item:

596 Views | 590 Downloads

Author Notes:

Corresponding Author: Steven Yeh, MD, 1365B Clifton Rd. NE, Atlanta, GA 30322, steven.yeh@emory.edu, Phone no: 404-778-5070, Fax no: 404-778-4380.

Financial disclosures:

William Pearce - No relevant financial interests.

Jason Hsu – No relevant financial interests.

Steven Yeh - Clearside (Consultant/Advisory Board), Bausch and Lomb (Consultant).

Subjects:

Research Funding:

Supported in part by an unrestricted grant to the Emory Eye Center from the Research to Prevent Blindness (RPB).

This work was supported in part by an NEI Core Grant for Vision Research (P30 EY 006360).

Keywords:

  • Science & Technology
  • Life Sciences & Biomedicine
  • Ophthalmology
  • drug delivery
  • encapsulated cell technology
  • posterior uveitis
  • suprachoroidal
  • DEXAMETHASONE INTRAVITREAL IMPLANT
  • FLUOCINOLONE ACETONIDE IMPLANT
  • CELL INTRAOCULAR IMPLANTS
  • DIABETIC MACULAR EDEMA
  • RETINAL VEIN OCCLUSION
  • SUPRACHOROIDAL SPACE
  • PORCINE MODEL
  • UVEITIS
  • DEGENERATION
  • TRIAL

Advances in drug delivery to the posterior segment

Tools:

Journal Title:

Current Opinion in Ophthalmology

Volume:

Volume 26, Number 3

Publisher:

, Pages 233-239

Type of Work:

Article | Post-print: After Peer Review

Abstract:

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Emerging developments and research for drug delivery to the posterior segment offer a promising future for the treatment of vitreoretinal disease. As new technologies enter the market, clinicians should be aware of new indications and ongoing clinical trials. RECENT FINDINGS: This review summarizes the advantages and shortcomings of the most commonly used drug delivery methods, including vitreous dynamics, physician sustainability and patient preferences. Currently available, intravitreal, corticosteroid-release devices offer surgical and in-office management of retinal vascular disease and posterior uveitis. The suprachoroidal space offers a new anatomic location for the delivery of lower dose medications directly to the target tissue. Implantable drug reservoirs would potentially allow for less frequent intravitreal injections reducing treatment burdens and associated risks. Newer innovations in encapsulated cell technology offer promising results in early clinical trials. SUMMARY: Although pars plana intravitreal injection remains the mainstay of therapy for many vitreoretinal diseases, targeted delivery and implantable eluting devices are rapidly demonstrating safety and efficacy. These therapeutic modalities offer promising options for the vitreoretinal therapeutic landscape.

Copyright information:

© 2015, Wolters Kluwer Health.

Export to EndNote