About this item:

527 Views | 1,047 Downloads

Author Notes:

Correspondence: syokoya@emory.edu

SY designed, organized, performed SWISS MODEL and molecular evolutionary analyses.

AA performed AMBER geometry optimization and SWISS model analyses.

TT, YL and DF performed experiments.

SY and AA wrote the paper.

We thank Dr. Rosalie K. Crouch (Storm Eye Institute, Medical University of South Carolina) and National Eye Institute for supplying 11-cis-retinal and comments by Dr. Ruth Yokoyama and anonymous reviewers are greatly appreciated.

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Subjects:

Research Funding:

S.Y. is supported by National Institutes of Health (EY016400) and Emory University.

Keywords:

  • Visual pigments
  • UV
  • UV and violet reception
  • Spectral tuning
  • Mutagenesis analyses
  • Hydrogen-bond network

A simple method for studying the molecular mechanisms of ultraviolet and violet reception in vertebrates

Journal Title:

BMC Evolutionary Biology

Volume:

Volume 16, Number 1

Publisher:

Type of Work:

Article | Final Publisher PDF

Abstract:

Background Many vertebrate species use ultraviolet (UV) reception for such basic behaviors as foraging and mating, but many others switched to violet reception and improved their visual resolution. The respective phenotypes are regulated by the short wavelength-sensitive (SWS1) pigments that absorb light maximally (λmax) at ~360 and 395–440 nm. Because of strong epistatic interactions, the biological significance of the extensive mutagenesis results on the molecular basis of spectral tuning in SWS1 pigments and the mechanisms of their phenotypic adaptations remains uncertain. Results The magnitudes of the λmax-shifts caused by mutations in a present-day SWS1 pigment and by the corresponding forward mutations in its ancestral pigment are often dramatically different. To resolve these mutagenesis results, the A/B ratio, in which A and B are the areas formed by amino acids at sites 90, 113 and 118 and by those at sites 86, 90 and 118 and 295, respectively, becomes indispensable. Then, all critical mutations that generated the λmax of a SWS1 pigment can be identified by establishing that 1) the difference between the λmax of the ancestral pigment with these mutations and that of the present-day pigment is small (3 ~ 5 nm, depending on the entire λmax-shift) and 2) the difference between the corresponding A/B ratios is < 0.002. Conclusion Molecular adaptation has been studied mostly by using comparative sequence analyses. These statistical results provide biological hypotheses and need to be tested using experimental means. This is an opportune time to explore the currently available and new genetic systems and test these statistical hypotheses. Evaluating the λmaxs and A/B ratios of mutagenized present-day and their ancestral pigments, we now have a method to identify all critical mutations that are responsible for phenotypic adaptation of SWS1 pigments. The result also explains spectral tuning of the same pigments, a central unanswered question in phototransduction.

Copyright information:

© Yokoyama et al. 2016. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

This is an Open Access work distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Creative Commons License

Export to EndNote