About this item:

663 Views | 1,009 Downloads

Author Notes:

Correspondence: cjberg@emory.edu; Tel.: +1-404-727-7589

Carla J. Berg, Nino Maglakelidze, Lela Starua, and Marina Topuridze created the data collection instruments and oversaw data collection.

Samantha A. Smith and Ta Misha Bascombe conducted data analysis.

Carla J. Berg led manuscript preparation.

Samantha A. Smith, Ta Misha Bascombe, Nino Maglakelidze, Lela Starua, and Marina Topuridze contributed to the manuscript development.

We would like to thank the Georgia National Center for Disease Control and Public Health for their scientific input and technical support in conducting this research and Tbilisi State Medical University for hosting Carla J. Berg during her tenure as a Fulbright Scholar in Georgia.

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Subject:

Research Funding:

This research was supported by the National Cancer Institute (K07 CA139114; PI: Carla J. Berg), the Georgia Cancer Coalition (PI: Carla J. Berg), and the Council for International Exchange of Scholars Fulbright Scholars Program.

Keywords:

  • tobacco control
  • secondhand smoke exposure
  • health policy
  • health disparities

Smoke-free public policies and voluntary policies in personal settings in Tbilisi, Georgia: A qualitative study

Tools:

Journal Title:

International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Volume:

Volume 13, Number 2

Publisher:

Type of Work:

Article | Final Publisher PDF

Abstract:

Georgia has limited tobacco control policies, particularly in the area of smoke-free public policies, which may influence the adoption of smoke-free home rules. We qualitatively examined knowledge about and reactions to public and personal smoke-free policies among Tbilisi residents. In Spring 2014, we conducted six focus groups among 47 total participants—two among male smokers, one among male nonsmokers, two among female smokers, and one among female nonsmokers. Our sample was 48.9% male and 70.2% past 30-day smokers. Most believed that SHS was dangerous, with particular concern regarding the impact of SHS on children and pregnant women. Many had misconceptions about how to protect others from SHS and the effectiveness of some approaches. Many indicated that they had some type of home rules, but few reported a complete ban on smoking in the home. Even when some restrictions were in place, they rarely were effective or enforced. Common concerns about the partial smoke-free public policy in Georgia included its economic impact, perceived discrimination among smokers, and the policy being against the Georgian culture. These concerns were heightened when participants were asked about the possible implementation of a complete smoke-free policy. Educational programs are needed to promote smoke-free policies in Georgia.

Copyright information:

© 2016 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.

This is an Open Access work distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Creative Commons License

Export to EndNote