About this item:

612 Views | 483 Downloads

Author Notes:

Corresponding author: C. Barrett Bowling MD, MSPH, Atlanta VAMC, 1670 Clairmont Road (11B), Decatur, GA, 30033, USA, Phone: (404) 321-6111 Fax: (404) 728-7779, E-mail: cbbowli@emory.edu

The authors thank the other investigators, the staff, and the participants of the REGARDS study for their valuable contributions. A full list of participating REGARDS investigators and institutions can be found at http://www.regardsstudy.org.

Conflict of interest: DGW and PM have received grant support from Amgen Inc. LDC, RMT, OMG, SJ and CBB have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke or the National Institutes of Health. Representatives of the funding agency have been involved in the review of the manuscript but not directly involved in the collection, management, analysis or interpretation of the data.

Amgen did not have any role in the design and conduct of the study, the collection, management, data analysis, or interpretation of the data, or the preparation or approval of the manuscript.

Subjects:

Research Funding:

This research project is supported by a cooperative agreement U01 NS041588 from the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Service.

Additional support was provided by an investigator-initiated grant-in-aid from Amgen Inc. to DGW.

Additional support was provided through the National Institute on Aging (R03AG042336-01) and the T. Franklin Williams Scholarship Award (funding provided by: Atlantic Philanthropies, Inc, the John A. Hartford Foundation, the Association of Specialty Professors, the American Society of Nephrology and the American Geriatrics Society) and the US Department of Veterans Affairs (1IK2CX000856-01A1).

Keywords:

  • Science & Technology
  • Life Sciences & Biomedicine
  • Medicine, General & Internal
  • General & Internal Medicine
  • aged
  • 80 and over
  • kidney function tests
  • renal insufficiency
  • chronic
  • mortality
  • CHRONIC KIDNEY-DISEASE
  • SERUM CREATININE
  • ALL-CAUSE
  • ALBUMINURIA
  • PREVALENCE
  • EQUATIONS
  • COMPLICATIONS
  • ASSOCIATION
  • MORTALITY
  • ADULTS

The role of cystatin-C in the confirmation of reduced glomerular filtration rate among the oldest old

Tools:

Journal Title:

Archives of Medical Science

Volume:

Volume 12, Number 1

Publisher:

, Pages 55-67

Type of Work:

Article | Final Publisher PDF

Abstract:

INTRODUCTION Current guidelines suggest using cystatin-C to confirm a reduced creatinine-based estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFRcr) when the latter is thought to be inaccurate. Older adults have reduced muscle mass, which may affect the accuracy of eGFRcr. We evaluated the use of cystatin-C-based eGFR (eGFRcys) to confirm reduced eGFRcr among adults ≥ 80 years of age and, for comparison, younger adults. MATERIAL AND METHODS We analyzed data from 3,059 REasons for Geographic And Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) study participants with reduced eGFRcr (< 60 ml/min/1.73 m(2)) enrolled in 2003-2007 who were not on dialysis. eGFRcr and eGFRcys were calculated using age, sex and race-adjusted equations. Confirmed reduced eGFRcr was defined as eGFRcys < 60 ml/min/1.73 m(2). Prevalence of chronic kidney disease complications at baseline and all-cause mortality up to March 2012 were calculated. Analyses were stratified by age: < 65, 65-79 and ≥ 80 years. RESULTS Among participants < 65, 65-79 and ≥ 80 years of age, 76.5%, 85.7% and 92.5%, respectively, had reduced eGFRcr confirmed with eGFRcys (p < 0.001). Among participants ≥ 80 years of age, those with reduced eGFRcr confirmed with eGFRcys had higher prevalence of hypertension (79.1% vs. 65.1%, p = 0.03) and albuminuria (38.3% vs. 22.7%, p = 0.04) and higher risk for all-cause mortality (hazard ratio: 2.43; 95% confidence interval: 1.19-5.01) as compared with those in whom reduced eGFRcr was not confirmed by eGFRcys. CONCLUSIONS Reduced eGFRcr was confirmed using eGFRcys for the vast majority of adults ≥ 80 years. These results suggest that using cystatin-C to confirm a reduced eGFRcr may not be necessary among the oldest old.

Copyright information:

© 2016 Termedia & Banach

This is an Open Access work distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/).

Creative Commons License

Export to EndNote