About this item:

2,565 Views | 0 Downloads

Author Notes:

Address correspondence to Lisa M. Gargano, PhD, School of Medicine, Emory University, 1462 Clifton Rd NE, Room 446, Atlanta, GA 30329. E-mail: lgargan@emory.edu

We thank Dianne Miller and Ashley Freeman for administrative support; the superintendents, principals, teachers and staff, parents, and students in our participating counties for participation and support; Melba McNorrill, Carol Usry, Amy Jenkins, and Dr Ketty M. Gonzalez, district health director for the East Central Health District, for support; Tracy Culbreath (GRITS); county health departments in the East Central Health District; private providers in our provider-based county; and our community liaisons in our intervention counties.

Subject:

Research Funding:

This work was supported by Centers for Disease Control and Prevention grant 5 R18 IP000166 and NIH grant 5T32AI074492-02 (to Dr Painter). LAIV used in this campaign was from an in-kind donation by MedImmune Inc.

Keywords:

  • influenza vaccine
  • school-based clinics
  • adolescents
  • pandemic preparedness

Multicomponent Interventions to Enhance Influenza Vaccine Delivery to Adolescents

Show all authors Show less authors

Tools:

Journal Title:

Pediatrics

Volume:

Volume 128, Number 5

Publisher:

, Pages e1092-e1099

Type of Work:

Article | Post-print: After Peer Review

Abstract:

OBJECTIVE: To compare school- versus provider-based approaches to improving influenza vaccination coverage among adolescents in rural Georgia. METHODS: We used a nonrandomized, 3-armed design: (1) a middle- and high school-based influenza vaccination intervention in 1 county; (2) a provider-based influenza vaccination intervention in a second county; and (3) a standard-of-care condition in a third county. Interventions also included distribution of an educational brochure, school presentations, and community-based outreach to enhance vaccine knowledge and awareness among adolescents and their parents. RESULTS: During the 2008–2009 influenza season, 70 (19%) of 370 students were vaccinated in the school-based county and 110 (15%) of 736 students were vaccinated in the provider-based county, compared with 71 (8%) of 889 students in the standard-of-care county (risk ratio [RR]school: 2.4 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.7–3.2]; RRprovider: 1.9 [95% CI: 1.4–2.5]). During 2009–2010, seasonal influenza vaccination coverage was 114 (30.4%) of 375 of students in the school-based county, 122 (16.9%) of 663 of students in the provider-based county, and 131 (15.2%) of 861 students in the standard-of-care county (RRschool: 2.3 [95% CI: 1.9–2.9]; RRprovider: 1.2 [95% CI: 0.97–1.5]). CONCLUSIONS: Special efforts to promote influenza vaccination among rural, predominantly black students were associated with increased vaccination coverage. The school-based influenza vaccination intervention was associated with the highest levels of vaccination coverage. This study revealed the efficacy of school-based influenza education to improve vaccination rates among adolescents.

Copyright information:

Copyright © 2011 by the American Academy of Pediatrics

Export to EndNote