Objectives:Persons living with HIV (PLWH) are at greater risk for acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Practice patterns of ACS management by HIV serostatus are unknown. We examined the presentation and management of ACS in PLWH.Design:Retrospective case-control study.Methods:We included 86 PLWH and 263 sex-matched and race-matched HIV-negative controls hospitalized with ACS between 2004 and 2013. We performed multivariable conditional logistic regression to determine the associations between HIV serostatus and ACS type and management.Results:Both groups were predominantly of black race and male sex. PLWH were significantly younger (53 vs. 60 years) and more likely to smoke (48 vs. 31%). Among PLWH, 30% had CD4+ cell count less than 200 cells/μl and 58% had undetectable HIV RNA. PLWH had more single-vessel disease and a higher median Gensini score among those with single-vessel disease (32 vs. 4.25) than controls. HIV serostatus was positively associated with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) (95% confidence interval (CI)):5.05 (1.82-14.02)], and any revascularization procedure after ACS [aOR (95% CI): 2.90 (1.01-8.39)] and negatively associated with non-STEMI [aOR (95% CI): 0.33 (0.14-0.79)] presentation. PLWH who underwent stent placement had a higher likelihood of bare metal stent placement compared with controls [70 vs. 15%, aOR (95% CI): 5.94 (1.33-26.55)]. Among PLWH, ACS characteristics were not significantly associated with CD4+ cell count, HIV RNA, or antiretroviral therapy.Conclusion:PLWH hospitalized with ACS were more likely to have severe single-vessel disease, present with STEMI rather than non-STEMI, and undergo revascularization, and less likely to have a drug-eluting stent placed than matched HIV-negative controls, suggesting that coronary plaque morphology and/or distribution is different with HIV infection and warrants further investigation.

Objectives: The aim of this trial was to determine whether ultrasound-assisted thrombolysis (USAT) is superior to standard catheter-directed thrombolysis (SCDT) in pulmonary arterial thrombus reduction for patients with submassive pulmonary embolism (sPE). Background: Catheter-directed therapy has been increasingly used in sPE and massive pulmonary embolism as a decompensation prevention and potentially lifesaving procedure. It is unproved whether USAT is superior to SCDT using traditional multiple-side-hole catheters in the treatment of patients with pulmonary embolism. Methods: Adults with sPE were enrolled. Participants were randomized 1:1 to USAT or SCDT. The primary outcome was 48-hour clearance of pulmonary thrombus assessed by pre- and postprocedural computed tomographic angiography using a refined Miller score. Secondary outcomes included improvement in right ventricular–to–left ventricular ratio, intensive care unit and hospital stay, bleeding, and adverse events up to 90 days. Results: Eighty-one patients with acute sPE were randomized and were available for analysis. The mean total dose of alteplase for USAT was 19 ± 7 mg and for SCDT was 18 ± 7 mg (P = 0.53), infused over 14 ± 6 and 14 ± 5 hours, respectively (P = 0.99). In the USAT group, the mean raw pulmonary arterial thrombus score was reduced from 31 ± 4 at baseline to 22 ± 7 (P < 0.001). In the SCDT group, the score was reduced from 33 ± 4 to 23 ± 7 (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in mean thrombus score reduction between the 2 groups (P = 0.76). The mean reduction in right ventricular/left ventricular ratio from baseline (1.54 ± 0.30 for USAT, 1.69 ± 0.44 for SCDT) to 48 hours was 0.37 ± 0.34 in the USAT group and 0.59 ± 0.42 in the SCDT group (P = 0.01). Major bleeding (1 stroke and 1 vaginal bleed requiring transfusion) occurred in 2 patients, both in the USAT group. Conclusions: In the SUNSET sPE (Standard vs. Ultrasound-Assisted Catheter Thrombolysis for Submassive Pulmonary Embolism) trial, patients undergoing USAT had similar pulmonary arterial thrombus reduction compared with those undergoing SCDT, using comparable mean lytic doses and durations of lysis.

Background: Coronary physiology assessments have been shown by multiple trials to add clinical value in detecting significant coronary artery disease and predicting cardiovascular outcomes. Fractional flow reserve (FFR) obtained during invasive coronary angiography (ICA) has become the new reference standard for hemodynamic significance detection. Absolute myocardial blood flow (MBF) quantification by means of dynamic positron emission tomography (dPET) has high diagnostic and prognostic values. FFR is an invasive measure and as such cannot be applied broadly, while MBF quantification is commonly performed on standard vascular territories intermixing normal flow from normal regions with abnormal flow from abnormal regions and consequently limiting its diagnostic power. Objective: The aim of this study is to provide physicians with reliable software tools for the non-invasive assessment of lesion-specific physiological significance for the entire coronary tree by combining PET-derived absolute flow data and coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA)-derived anatomy and coronary centerlines. Methods: The dynamic PET/CTA myocardial blood flow assessment with fused imagery (DEMYSTIFY) study is an observational prospective clinical study to develop algorithms and software tools to fuse coronary anatomy data obtained from CTA with dPET data to non-invasively measure absolute MBF, myocardial flow reserve, and relative flow reserve across specific coronary lesions. Patients (N = 108) will be collected from 4 institutions (Emory University Hospital, USA; Chonnam National University Hospital, South Korea; Samsung Medical Center, South Korea; Seoul National University Hospital, South Korea). These results will be compared to those obtained invasively in the catheterization laboratory and to a relatively novel non-invasive technique to estimate FFR based on CTA and computational fluid dynamics. Conclusions: Success of these developments should lead to the following benefits: (1) eliminate unnecessary invasive coronary angiography in patients with no significant lesions, (2) avoid stenting physiologically insignificant lesions, (3) guide percutaneous coronary interventions process to the location of significant lesions, (4) provide a flow-color-coded 3D roadmap of the entire coronary tree to guide bypass surgery, and (5) use less radiation and lower the cost from unnecessary procedures. Trial registry: The DEMYSTIFY study has been registered on ClinicalTrials.gov with registration number NCT04221594.

This is a focused review looking at the pharmacological support in cardiogenic shock. There are a plethora of data evaluating vasopressors and inotropes in septic shock, but the data are limited for cardiogenic shock. This review article describes in detail the pathophysiology of cardiogenic shock, the mechanism of action of different vasopressors and inotropes emphasizing their indications and potential side effects. This review article incorporates the currently used specific risk-prediction models in cardiogenic shock as well as integrates data from many trials on the use of vasopressors and inotropes. Lastly, this review seeks to discuss the future direction for vasoactive medications in cardiogenic shock.

Importance The risk of death from acute pulmonary embolism can range as high as 15%, depending on patient factors at initial presentation. Acute treatment decisions are largely based on an estimate of this mortality risk. Objective To assess the performance of risk assessment scores in a modern, US cohort of patients with acute pulmonary embolism. Design, Setting, and Participants This multicenter cohort study was conducted between October 2016 and October 2017 at 8 hospitals participating in the Pulmonary Embolism Response Team (PERT) Consortium registry. Included patients were adults who presented with acute pulmonary embolism and had sufficient information in the medical record to calculate risk scores. Data analysis was performed from March to May 2020. Main Outcomes and Measures All-cause mortality (7- and 30-day) and associated discrimination were assessed by the area under the receiver operator curve (AUC). Results Among 416 patients with acute pulmonary embolism (mean [SD] age, 61.3 [17.6] years; 207 men [49.8%]), 7-day mortality in the low-risk groups ranged from 1.3% (1 patient) to 3.1% (4 patients), whereas 30-day mortality ranged from 2.6% (1 patient) to 10.2% (13 patients). Among patients in the highest-risk groups, the 7-day mortality ranged from 7.0% (18 patients) to 16.3% (7 patients), whereas 30-day mortality ranged from 14.4% (37 patients) to 26.3% (26 patients). Each of the risk stratification tools had modest discrimination for 7-day mortality (AUC range, 0.616-0.666) with slightly lower discrimination for 30-day mortality (AUC range, 0.550-0.694). Conclusions and Relevance These findings suggest that commonly used risk tools for acute pulmonary embolism have modest estimating ability. Future studies to develop and validate better risk assessment tools are needed.