The physical exam is changing. Many have argued that the physical exam of the 21st century should include point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS). POCUS is being taught in medical schools and has been endorsed by the major professional societies of internal medicine. In this review we describe the trend toward using POCUS in medicine and describe where the practicing nephrologist fits in. We discuss what a nephrologist's POCUS exam should entail and we give special attention to what nephrologists can gain from learning POCUS. We suggest a 'nephro-centric' approach that includes not only ultrasound of the kidney and bladder, but of the heart, lungs and vascular access. We conclude by reviewing some of the sparse data available to guide training initiatives and give suggested next steps for advancing POCUS in nephrology.
The population of patients with ESRD in the United States is progressively increasing, with hemodialysis (HD) as the major mode of renal replacement therapy. The National Kidney Foundation's Dialysis Outcomes and Quality Initiative and the Fistula First Initiative recommend increasing the use of arteriovenous fistulae (AVF) in both incident and prevalent hemodialysis patients. One measure proposed is the use of pre-operative vascular mapping to assess the upper extremities for the presence of suitable vessels prior to the surgical creation of an AVF among both pre-dialysis CKD and ESRD patients on HD. This article aims to review the literature on vascular mapping, including the various techniques; their advantages and disadvantages; and whether they help to maximize the AVF creation rate as well as increase the use of AVF in the HD population.
by
Dinesh Khanna;
Puja P. Khanna;
John D. FitzGerald;
Manjit K. Singh;
Sangmee Bae;
Tuhina Neogi;
Michael H. Pillinger;
Joan Merill;
Susan Lee;
Shraddha Prakash;
Marian Kaldas;
Maneesh Gogia;
Fernando Perez-Ruiz;
Will Taylor;
Frederic Liote;
Hyon Choi;
Jasvinder A. Singh;
Nicola Dalbeth;
Sanford Kaplan;
Vandana Dua Niyyar;
Danielle Jones;
Steven A. Yarows;
Blake Roessler;
Gail Kerr;
Charles King;
Gerald Levy;
Daniel E. Furst;
N. Lawrence Edwards;
Brian Mandell;
H. Ralph Schumacher;
Mark Robbins;
Neil Wenger;
Robert Terkeltaub
by
Dinesh Khanna;
John D. FitzGerald;
Puja P. Khanna;
Sangmee Bae;
Manjit Singh;
Tuhina Neogi;
Michael H. Pillinger;
Joan Merill;
Susan Lee;
Shraddha Prakash;
Marian Kaldas;
Maneesh Gogia;
Fernando Perez-Ruiz;
Will Taylor;
Frederic Liote;
Hyon Choi;
Jasvinder A. Singh;
Nicola Dalbeth;
Sanford Kaplan;
Vandana Dua Niyyar;
Danielle Jones;
Steven A. Yarows;
Blake Roessler;
Gail Kerr;
Charles King;
Gerald Levy;
Daniel E. Furst;
N. Lawrence Edwards;
Brian Mandell;
H. Ralph Schumacher;
Mark Robbins;
Neil Wenger;
Robert Terkeltaub
by
Shree G. Sharma;
John M. Arthur;
Stephen M. Bonsib;
Kevin D. Phelan;
Manisha Singh;
Nithin Karakala;
Kelly W. Bulloch;
Vandana Dua Niyyar;
Juan Carlos Q. Velez
Background: Medical practice trends and limitations in trainees' duty hours have diminished the interest and exposure of nephrology fellows to percutaneous kidney biopsy (PKB). We hypothesized that an integrated nephrology-pathology-led simulation may be an effective educational tool. Materials and methods: A 4-hour PKB simulation workshop (KBSW), led by two ultrasonography (US)-trained nephrologists and two nephropathologists, consisted of 6 stations: 1) diagnostic kidney US with live patients, 2) kidney pathology with plasticine models of embedded torso cross-sections, 3) US-based PKB with mannequin (Blue Phantom™), 4) kidney pathology with dissected cadavers, 5) US-based PKB in lightlyembalmed cadavers, and 6) tissue retrieval adequacy examination by microscope. A 10-question survey assessing knowledge acquisition and procedural confidence gain was administered pre- and post-KBSW. Results: 21 participants attended the KBSW and completed the surveys. The overall percentage of correct answers to knowledge questions increased from 55 to 83% (p = 0.016). The number of "extremely confident" answers increased from 0 - 5% to 19 - 28% in all 4 questions (p = 0.02 - 0.04), and the number of "not at all confident" answers significantly decreased from 14 - 62% to 0 - 5% in 3 out of 4 questions (p = 0.0001 - 0.03). Impact of the imparted training on subsequent practice pattern was not assessed. Conclusion: A novel KBSW is an effective educational tool to acquire proficiency in PKB performance and could help regain interest among trainees in performing PKBs.