Background: Acute nonarteritic central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO) is an eye-stroke with poor visual prognosis and no proven effective therapies. Given advances in acute stroke care, thrombolysis in CRAO merits critical re-examination. We review the evidence for intravenous (IV) and intra-arterial (IA) tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) in CRAO management. Evidence acquisition: MEDLINE, Scopus, and Cochrane online databases were systematically searched from 1960 to present, for reports of acute IV or IA therapy with alteplase or tenecteplase in nonarteritic CRAO patients. English-language case-reports, case-series, interventional studies or randomized controlled trials were included. The study type, age and number of subjects, the regimen administered, the time since symptoms’ onset, visual outcome and safety reports were noted. Results: Use of IV thrombolysis with alteplase was reported in 7 manuscripts encompassing 111 patients, with 54% of them receiving IV-tPA within 4.5 hours of symptom onset, and none developing symptomatic intracranial or ocular hemorrhage. Six studies described IA alteplase administration, with only 18 out of a total of 134 patients (13.4%) treated within the first 6 hours after visual loss. The reported adverse events were minimal. Visual outcomes post-IV and IA thrombolysis (IAT) were heterogeneously reported; however most studies demonstrated benefit of the respective reperfusion therapies when administered very early. We found no reports of tenecteplase administration in CRAO. Conclusions: In 2020, nonarteritic CRAO patients should theoretically receive the same thrombolytic therapies, in the same time-window, as patients with acute cerebral ischemia. Eye-stroke and tele-eye-stroke code encounters must include an expert ophthalmologic evaluation to confirm the correct diagnosis and to evaluate for ocular signs that may help guide IV-tPA administration or intra-arterial management. Future research should focus on developing feasible retinal penumbra imaging studies that, similar to cerebral tissue viability or perfusion imaging, can be incorporated into the thrombolysis decision-making algorithm.

Objective: Acute central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO) is an emergency with poor visual outcome. Intravenous thrombolysis within 4.5 h of vision loss is safe and may improve vision, but is rarely administered because of frequent delays in presentation. We describe a subgroup of CRAO patients presenting within 24 h of vision loss to a tertiary care center affiliated with a comprehensive stroke center. Materials and Methods: Retrospective review of 181 consecutive CRAO patients seen at our institution from 2010 to 2020. Results: Out of 181 CRAO patients, 62 (34%) presented within 24 h of vision loss and tended to live closer to the hospital. These patients were more likely to be admitted to the hospital and receive comprehensive stroke work-up compared to patients who presented after 24 h of vision loss. Patients presenting after 24 h did not necessarily receive prior appropriate work-up at outside institutions. Conservative treatments for CRAO were administered to 20/181 patients, and only 3 patients received intravenous thrombolysis. Conclusions: Patients with CRAO do not present to the emergency department fast enough and diagnosis of CRAO is often delayed. Despite having a protocol in place, only 3/181 patients received IV thrombolysis, emphasizing the difficulty in administering very acute treatments for CRAO. Public education regarding CRAO is necessary to improve presentation times, management, and visual outcomes. Hospitals need to develop accelerated diagnostic pathway protocols for patients with acute vision loss so that CRAO patients may be diagnosed and be considered for potential acute treatments as quickly as possible.

Acute retinal vascular occlusions are common causes of visual impairment. Although both retinal artery occlusions and retinal vein occlusions are associated with increased age and cardiovascular risk factors, their pathophysiology, systemic implications, and management differ substantially. Acute management of retinal artery occlusions involves a multidisciplinary approach including neurologists with stroke expertise, whereas treatment of retinal vein occlusions is provided by ophthalmologists. Optimisation of systemic risk factors by patients’ primary care providers is an important component of the management of these two disorders.

Purpose: Brain tumors are the leading cause of death from childhood cancer. Although overall survival has improved due to earlier detection, better therapies, and improved surveillance, visual dysfunction and impaired vision-related quality-of-life (VR-QOL) are often unrecognized in children. This project investigated VR-QOL in pediatric brain tumor patients. Methods: We evaluated visual impairment and quality-of-life (QOL) in a quality improvement project at one tertiary care center. Patients ≤ 18, greater than 6 months from diagnosis of brain tumor, excluding intrinsic anterior visual pathway tumors, underwent standardized neuro-ophthalmologic examination. Health-related QOL (HR-QOL) (PedsQL Brain Tumor Module) and VR-QOL questionnaires [CVFQ (Children’s Visual Function Questionnaire) in children < 8, and EYE-Q in children 8–18] were obtained from patients and parents. Results: Among 77 patients, craniopharyngiomas (n = 16, 21%) and astrocytomas (n = 15, 20%) were the most common tumors. Among 44/77 (57%) visually impaired children, 7 (16%) were legally blind. Eye-Q median score was 3.40 (interquartile range 3.00–3.75), worse than average scores for normal children. Eye-Q score decreased 0.12 with every 0.1 increase in logMAR visual acuity (p < 0.001). Patients who were legally blind had a significantly lower Eye-Q score than those who were not [0.70 vs. 3.44 (p < 0.001)]. Cognitive HR-QOL scores decreased 1.3 for every 0.1 increase in logMAR visual acuity (p = 0.02). Conclusions: Pediatric brain tumor patients’ vision, HR-QOL, and VR-QOL were often severely affected even when tumors were considered cured. Visual acuity and legal blindness correlated with VR-QOL. Systematic neuro-ophthalmologic examinations in pediatric primary brain tumor patients are necessary to facilitate early preventative and corrective ophthalmologic interventions.

Background: Leber Hereditary Optic Neuropathy (LHON) is a rare, maternally-inherited mitochondrial disease that primarily affects retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) and their axons in the optic nerve, leading to irreversible, bilateral severe vision loss. Lenadogene nolparvovec gene therapy was developed as a treatment for patients with vision loss from LHON caused by the most prevalent m.11778G > A mitochondrial DNA point mutation in the MT-ND4 gene. Lenadogene nolparvovec is a replication-defective recombinant adeno-associated virus vector 2 serotype 2 (AAV2/2), encoding the human wild-type MT-ND4 protein. Lenadogene nolparvovec was administered by intravitreal injection (IVT) in LHON patients harboring the m.11778G > A ND4 mutation in a clinical development program including one phase 1/2 study (REVEAL), three phase 3 pivotal studies (REVERSE, RESCUE, REFLECT), and one long-term follow-up study (RESTORE, the follow-up of REVERSE and RESCUE patients). Case presentation: A 67-year-old woman with MT-ND4 LHON, included in the REVERSE clinical study, received a unilateral IVT of lenadogene nolparvovec in the right eye and a sham injection in the left eye in May 2016, 11.4 months and 8.8 months after vision loss in her right and left eyes, respectively. The patient had a normal brain magnetic resonance imaging with contrast at the time of diagnosis of LHON. Two years after treatment administration, BCVA had improved in both eyes. The product was well tolerated with mild and resolutive anterior chamber inflammation in the treated eye. In May 2019, the patient was diagnosed with a right temporal lobe glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype, World Health Organization grade 4, based on histological analysis of a tumor excision. The brain tumor was assessed for the presence of vector DNA by using a sensitive validated qPCR assay targeting the ND4 sequence of the vector. Conclusion: ND4 DNA was not detected (below 15.625 copies/μg of genomic DNA) in DNA extracted from the brain tumor, while a housekeeping gene DNA was detected at high levels. Taken together, this data shows the absence of detection of lenadogene nolparvovec in a brain tumor (glioblastoma) of a treated patient in the REVERSE clinical trial 3 years after gene therapy administration, supporting the long-term favorable safety of lenadogene nolparvovec.

Very poor (hand motion or worse) visual acuity at presentation is highly unusual in non-arteritic anterior ischaemic optic neuropathy. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 151 consecutive non-arteritic anterior ischaemic optic neuropathy patients seen at our institution between July 2014 and April 2016 to evaluate the frequency and characteristics of patients with very poor visual acuity in non-arteritic anterior ischaemic optic neuropathy. Hand motion or worse visual acuity was documented in 17 patients (11%); all patients had at least one vascular risk factor and 14 (82%) had at least two vascular risk factors. Although severe vision loss at presentation does occur in non-arteritic anterior ischaemic optic neuropathy, an extensive workup should be obtained to rule out another cause, especially arteritic anterior ischaemic optic neuropathy.

INTRODUCTION: Lenadogene nolparvovec is a promising novel gene therapy for patients with Leber hereditary optic neuropathy (LHON) carrying the m.11778G>A ND4 mutation (MT-ND4). A previous pooled analysis of phase 3 studies showed an improvement in visual acuity of patients injected with lenadogene nolparvovec compared to natural history. Here, we report updated results by incorporating data from the latest phase 3 trial REFLECT in the pool, increasing the number of treated patients from 76 to 174. METHODS: The visual acuity of 174 MT-ND4-carrying patients with LHON injected in one or both eyes with lenadogene nolparvovec from four pooled phase 3 studies (REVERSE, RESCUE and their long-term extension trial RESTORE; and REFLECT trial) was compared to the spontaneous evolution of an external control group of 208 matched patients from 11 natural history studies. RESULTS: Treated patients showed a clinically relevant and sustained improvement in their visual acuity when compared to natural history. Mean improvement versus natural history was - 0.30 logMAR (+ 15 ETDRS letters equivalent) at last observation (P < 0.01) with a maximal follow-up of 3.9 years after injection. Most treated eyes were on-chart as compared to less than half of natural history eyes at 48 months after vision loss (89.6% versus 48.1%; P < 0.01) and at last observation (76.1% versus 44.4%; P < 0.01). When we adjusted for covariates of interest (gender, age of onset, ethnicity, and duration of follow-up), the estimated mean gain was - 0.43 logMAR (+ 21.5 ETDRS letters equivalent) versus natural history at last observation (P < 0.0001). Treatment effect was consistent across all phase 3 clinical trials. Analyses from REFLECT suggest a larger treatment effect in patients receiving bilateral injection compared to unilateral injection. CONCLUSION: The efficacy of lenadogene nolparvovec in improving visual acuity in MT-ND4 LHON was confirmed in a large cohort of patients, compared to the spontaneous natural history decline. Bilateral injection of gene therapy may offer added benefits over unilateral injection. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: NCT02652780 (REVERSE); NCT02652767 (RESCUE); NCT03406104 (RESTORE); NCT03293524 (REFLECT); NCT03295071 (REALITY).

Objective: To correlate the pathologic findings of temporal artery biopsies in patients clinically defined as positive, presumed, or negative for giant cell arteritis (GCA). Design: Retrospective case series. Participants and Controls: Patients evaluated for giant cell arteritis. Methods: Temporal artery biopsies examined between 1989 and 2007 were studied. Clinical information and residual tissue for immunohistochemical staining was identified in 107 patients. Clinical information was used in order to make a diagnosis of “positive”, “presumed”, or “negative” GCA. The biopsies were reviewed in a masked fashion and classified as “positive”, “indeterminate”, or “negative” based on published, classic pathologic diagnosis (CPD) criteria. All biopsies were immunostained for CD3 and CD68 and graded as “negative”, “mildly” (+), “moderately” (++), or “markedly” (+++) positive. Clinical and pathologic results were correlated and a modified pathologic diagnosis classification (MPD) scheme was developed. The modified scheme was compared in a masked fashion with the final clinical diagnosis and positive and negative predictive values (PVs) were calculated. Main Outcome Measures: Pathologic diagnosis and final clinical diagnosis. Results: Using the MPD classification, there were 25%, 16% and 61% positive, indeterminate, and negative biopsies, respectively. There was excellent correlation between the modified pathologic criteria and final clinical diagnosis (correlation coefficient 0.997, p value <0.0001, kappa 0.81). The positive predictive values (PVs) for CPD and MPD were 85% and 96%, respectively. The negative PVs for CPD and MPD were 64% and 61%, respectively. Positive and negative biopsies strongly correlated with clinical diagnoses of positive and negative for GCA, respectively whereas indeterminate cases moderately correlated with presumed GCA. The diagnosis did not change from the original biopsy in 11 patients who had a second biopsy. Immunostaining for CD 68 was helpful in several indeterminate cases. Conclusions: We recommend using the modified histologic classification of temporal artery biopsies. There are indeterminate cases that cannot be further defined using current pathologic classification criteria. A second biopsy has very limited value. Immunostaining for CD68 stain may be helpful in indeterminate cases, although the diagnosis in these cases is based on clinical judgement.

Objective: This work aimed to compare the evolution of visual outcomes in Leber hereditary optic neuropathy (LHON) patients treated with intravitreal gene therapy to the spontaneous evolution in prior natural history (NH) studies. Design: A combined analysis of two phase three randomized, double-masked, sham-controlled studies (REVERSE and RESCUE) and their joint long-term extension trial (CLIN06) evaluated the efficacy of rAAV2/2-ND4 vs. 11 pooled NH studies used as an external control. Subjects: The LHON subjects carried the m.11778G>A ND4 mutation and were aged ≥15 years at onset of vision loss. Methods: A total of 76 subjects received a single intravitreal rAAV2/2-ND4 injection in one eye and sham injection in the fellow eye within 1 year after vision loss in REVERSE and RESCUE. Both eyes were considered as treated due to the rAAV2/2-ND4 treatment efficacy observed in the contralateral eyes. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) from REVERSE, RESCUE, and CLIN06 up to 4.3 years after vision loss was compared to the visual acuity of 208 NH subjects matched for age and ND4 genotype. The NH subjects were from a LHON registry (REALITY) and from 10 NH studies. A locally estimated scatterplot smoothing (LOESS), non-parametric, local regression model was used to modelize visual acuity curves over time, and linear mixed model was used for statistical inferences. Main Outcome Measures: The main outcome measure was evolution of visual acuity from 12 months after vision loss, when REVERSE and RESCUE patients had been treated with rAAV2/2-ND4. Results: The LOESS curves showed that the BCVA of the treated patients progressively improved from month 12 to 52 after vision loss. At month 48, there was a statistically and clinically relevant difference in visual acuity of −0.33 logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution (LogMAR) (16.5 ETDRS letters equivalent) in favor of treated eyes vs. NH eyes (p < 0.01). Most treated eyes (88.7%) were on-chart at month 48 as compared to 48.1% of the NH eyes (p < 0.01). The treatment effect at last observation remained statistically and clinically significant when adjusted for age and duration of follow-up (−0.32 LogMAR, p < 0.0001). Conclusions: The m.11778G>A LHON patients treated with rAAV2/2-ND4 exhibited an improvement of visual acuity over more than 4 years after vision loss to a degree not demonstrated in NH studies. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT02652767, NCT02652780, NCT03406104, and NCT03295071.

The quality of ocular fundus photographs can affect the accuracy of the morphologic assessment of the optic nerve head (ONH), either by humans or by deep learning systems (DLS). In order to automatically identify ONH photographs of optimal quality, we have developed, trained, and tested a DLS, using an international, multicentre, multi-ethnic dataset of 5015 ocular fundus photographs from 31 centres in 20 countries participating to the Brain and Optic Nerve Study with Artificial Intelligence (BONSAI). The reference standard in image quality was established by three experts who independently classified photographs as of “good”, “borderline”, or “poor” quality. The DLS was trained on 4208 fundus photographs and tested on an independent external dataset of 807 photographs, using a multi-class model, evaluated with a one-vs-rest classification strategy. In the external-testing dataset, the DLS could identify with excellent performance “good” quality photographs (AUC = 0.93 (95% CI, 0.91–0.95), accuracy = 91.4% (95% CI, 90.0–92.9%), sensitivity = 93.8% (95% CI, 92.5–95.2%), specificity = 75.9% (95% CI, 69.7–82.1%) and “poor” quality photographs (AUC = 1.00 (95% CI, 0.99–1.00), accuracy = 99.1% (95% CI, 98.6–99.6%), sensitivity = 81.5% (95% CI, 70.6–93.8%), specificity = 99.7% (95% CI, 99.6–100.0%). “Borderline” quality images were also accurately classified (AUC = 0.90 (95% CI, 0.88–0.93), accuracy = 90.6% (95% CI, 89.1–92.2%), sensitivity = 65.4% (95% CI, 56.6–72.9%), specificity = 93.4% (95% CI, 92.1–94.8%). The overall accuracy to distinguish among the three classes was 90.6% (95% CI, 89.1–92.1%), suggesting that this DLS could select optimal quality fundus photographs in patients with neuro-ophthalmic and neurological disorders affecting the ONH.