This phase 1 trial utilising a Bayesian continual reassessment method evaluated bortezomib and sunitinib to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicities (DLT), and recommended doses of the combination.
Methods:
Patients with advanced solid organ malignancies were enrolled and received bortezomib weekly with sunitinib daily for 4 weeks, every 6 weeks. Initial doses were sunitinib 25 mg and bortezomib 1 mg m−2. Cohort size and dose level estimation was performed utilising the Escalation with Overdose Control (EWOC) adaptive method. Seven dose levels were evaluated; initially, sunitinib was increased to a goal dose of 50 mg with fixed bortezomib, then bortezomib was increased. Efficacy assessment occurred after each cycle using RECIST criteria.
Results:
Thirty patients were evaluable. During sunitinib escalation, DLTs of grade 4 thrombocytopenia (14%) and neutropenia (6%) at sunitinib 50 mg and bortezomib 1.3 mg m−2 were seen. Subsequent experience showed tolerability and activity for sunitinib 37.5 mg and bortezomib 1.9 mg m−2. Common grade 3/4 toxicities were neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, hypertension, and diarrhoea. The recommended doses for further study are bortezomib 1.9 mg m−2 and sunitinib 37.5 mg. Four partial responses were seen. Stable disease >6 months was noted in an additional six patients.
Conclusion:
Bortezomib and sunitinib are well tolerated and have anticancer activity, particularly in thyroid cancer. A phase 2 study of this combination in thyroid cancer patients is planned.
Background
Ethical concerns about Phase I trials persist. Important conceptual advances have been made in understanding concepts used to describe misunderstanding. However, a systematic empirical evaluation of the frequency of misunderstanding incorporating recent developments is lacking.
Methods
We queried 95 Phase I subjects to provide a more sophisticated estimate of the proportion who had therapeutic misconception (TM) - misunderstands the research purpose or how research differs from individualized care - and therapeutic misestimation (TMis) -misestimates the chance of research trial benefit as >20% or underestimates risk as 0%.
Results
65/95 (68.4%) respondents had TM, associated in a multivariate analysis with lower education and family income (p= 0.008, p = 0.001), but TM was not associated with the vulnerability of having hardly any treatment options. 89/95 (94%) had TMis, though only 18% reported this was a factual estimate. Although risks of investigational agents and those exacerbated by research, such as uncertain outcomes, were mentioned (39%, 41% respondents respectively), risks novel to research, such as research biopsies, were rarely mentioned (3%). Although most of these respondents thought their chance of benefit was higher and risk lower than the population chance (optimists) (54.6%), a substantial minority (37.6%) were pessimists.
Conclusions
TM continues to be prevalent. Estimates of personal benefit were not usually meant to report facts so it is unknown whether respondents had TMis. Although not more vulnerable, Phase I participants need improved understanding of key TM concepts, with attention to risks not found in standard of care.
Hydatid cystic disease is a parasitic infestation caused by Echinococcus granulosus and commonly manifests as hepatic and pulmonary cysts. When feasible, based on cyst size and location, surgical resection is potentially curative. Post-surgical recurrence of disease is encountered in up to 25% of patients. Secondary peritoneal contamination is a recognized complication in 5-10% of cases. Disseminated disease is usually palliated using systemic anti-parasitic agents such as benzimidazoles, albendazole and mebendazole but worsening of disease post-systemic treatment is frequent in 14-25% of patients. In this report, we share our experience of a patient with long-standing, chronic disseminated hydatidosis and subsequent diagnosis of non-small cell lung cancer who manifested evidence of reduced activity of the echinococcal disease following institution of chemotherapy for his new diagnosis of lung cancer. There was significant reduction in the serum level of anti-echinococcal antibody titers in tandem with chemotherapy administration. There was also minimal but notable decrease in the size of the cysts on serial cross-sectional imaging obtained for monitoring cancer response to chemotherapy. This intriguing observation of a possible benefit of anticancer chemotherapy against echinococcal disease in this index case may provide new insights for therapeutic exploration in disseminated echinococcal disease.
Background: The incidence of appendiceal cancers continues to rise at a very rapid pace. Although surgery has a central role in the management of appendiceal tumors, literature is lacking regarding the pattern and predictors of surgical treatment for patients with appendiceal cancers. We aimed to describe the surgical treatment for patients with appendiceal cancers, with emphasis on utilization based on histology. Methods: Hospitalized patients with appendiceal cancer in the US between 2006 and 2010 were included in the study. The Nationwide Inpatient Sample database maintained by the Agency for Health Care Research and Quality was employed for univariate and multivariate testing to identify factors significantly associated with patient outcome. Results: A total of 3,799 patient discharges were identified over the 5-year period covered by the study. Neuroendocrine tumor (NET) was the diagnosis in 291 (7.66%) patients and non-NET in 3,508 (92.34%) patients. The mean age was 56.8 years (± SD 14.6), with female predominance (54.73% vs. 45.27%). NET patients were younger than those with non-NET (50.7 vs. 57.4 years; P < 0.001). NET patients were more commonly treated with appendectomy compared to non-NET (OR: 1.59; 95% CI: 1.23 - 2.07; P < 0.001). Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) was used in 8.5% of all the cases, mostly in non-NET histology (91% vs. 8%). Majority of the patients treated with HIPEC had no co-morbid medical illness (60%), and received care at high volume hospitals located in urban areas. There was a very low incidence of in-hospital mortality (2.5%). Conclusions: The described surgical utilization pattern should prompt more research focusing on barriers to appropriate surgical debulking and HIPEC utilization in non-NET appendiceal cancers.
Cigarette smoking, either active or passive, is the most important risk factor in the development of human lung cancer. Mounting evidence indicates that cigarette smoke constituents not only contribute to tumorigenesis but also may increase the spread of cancer in the body. Nitrosamine 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone (NNK) is formed by nitrosation of nicotine and has been identified as the most potent carcinogen. NNK, an important component in cigarette smoke, may also promote tumor metastasis by regulating cell motility. Here we found that NNK can induce activation of a functionally interdependent protein kinase cascade, including c-Src, PKCι and FAK, in association with increased migration and invasion of human lung cancer cells. c-Src, PKCι and FAK are extensively co-localized in the cytoplasm. Treatment of cells with α7 nAChR specific inhibitor α-bungarotoxin (α-BTX) blocks NNK-stimulated activation of c-Src, PKCι and FAK and suppresses cell migration and invasion. Intriguingly, NNK enhances c-Src/PKCι and PKCι/FAK bindings, indicating a potential mechanism by which these kinases activate each other. Specific disruption of c-Src, PKCι or FAK expression by RNA interference significantly reduces NNK-induced cell migration and invasion. These findings suggest that NNK-induced migration and invasion may occur in a mechanism through activation of a c-Src/PKCι/FAK loop, which can contribute to metastasis and/or development of human lung cancer.
We conducted a phase II study of docetaxel in combination with everolimus, a mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor, for salvage therapy of advanced non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) based on promising preclinical and early-phase clinical data. Patients with advanced-stage NSCLC treated with one or two previous systemic therapy regimens were given docetaxel (60 mg/m2) and everolimus (5 mg orally once daily on days 1–19) every 3 weeks. Archived tumor specimens were evaluated for markers of mTOR pathway activation (total and phosphorylated mTOR, Akt, S6, eIF4e, and 4EBP1). Twenty-eight patients were enrolled (median age: 62 years; male: 13; Caucasians: 19; adenocarcinoma: 20; performance status 0, 3; performance status 1, 23; 1 previous regimen, 16). A median of 3.5 cycles of therapy was administered. Two patients experienced partial response and 15 had stable disease (clinical benefit rate, 70%). The 6-month progression-free survival rate was 5%, and the median overall survival was 9.6 months. Low pAkt expression correlated with clinical benefit rate (p = 0.01) but not with progression-free survival or overall survival. The combination of everolimus and docetaxel was tolerated well, but the efficacy was relatively modest in an unselected population of patients with NSCLC.
Loss of LKB1 is associated with increased metastasis and poor prognosis in lung cancer, but the development of targeted agents is in its infancy. Here we report that a glutaminolytic enzyme, glutamate dehydrogenase 1 (GDH1), upregulated upon detachment via pleomorphic adenoma gene 1 (PLAG1), provides anti-anoikis and pro-metastatic signals in LKB1-deficient lung cancer. Mechanistically, the GDH1 product α-KG activates CamKK2 by enhancing its substrate AMPK binding, which contributes to energy production that confers anoikis resistance. The effect of GDH1 on AMPK is evident in LKB1-deficient lung cancer, where AMPK activation predominantly depends on CamKK2. Targeting GDH1 with R162 attenuated tumor metastasis in patient-derived xenograft model and correlation studies in lung cancer patients further validated the clinical relevance of our finding. Our study provides insight into the molecular mechanism by which GDH1-mediated metabolic reprogramming of glutaminolysis mediates lung cancer metastasis and offers a therapeutic strategy for patients with LKB1-deficient lung cancer. Although elevated glutaminolysis has been demonstrated in cancer cells, the precise mechanism by which glutaminolysis promotes tumor metastasis remains unclear. In this article, Jin et al. demonstrate a mechanism by which GDH1 provides anti-anoikis and pro-metastatic signals through activating CamKK2 and AMPK that promotes tumor metastasis in LKB1-deficient lung cancer.
Inhibition of B-Raf/MEK/ERK signaling is an effective therapeutic strategy against certain types of cancers such as melanoma and thyroid cancer. While demonstrated to be effective anticancer agents, B-Raf or MEK inhibitors have also been associated with early tumor progression and development of secondary neoplasms. The ligation of tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) with its receptor, death receptor 5 (DR5), leading to induction of apoptosis, offers a promising anticancer strategy. Importantly, this is also a natural immunosurveillance mechanism against cancer development. We previously demonstrated that activated B-Raf/MEK/ERK signaling positively regulates DR5 expression. Hence, our current work sought to address whether B-Raf/MEK/ERK inhibition and the consequent suppression of DR5 expression impede cancer cell response to DR5 activation-induced apoptosis and activated immune cell-induced killing. We found that both B-Raf (for example, PLX4032) and MEK inhibitors (for example, AZD6244 and PD0325901) effectively inhibited ERK1/2 phosphorylation and reduced DR5 levels in both human thyroid cancer and melanoma cells. Similar to the observed effect of genetic knockdown of the B-Raf gene, pre-treatment of cancer cell lines with either B-Raf or MEK inhibitors attenuated or abolished cellular apoptotic response induced by TRAIL or the DR5 agonistic antibody AMG655 or cell killing by activated T cells. Our findings clearly show that inhibition of B-Raf/MEK/ERK signaling suppresses DR5 expression and impairs DR5 activation-induced apoptosis and T cell-mediated killing of cancer cells. These findings suggest a potential negative impact of B-Raf or MEK inhibition on TRAIL- or DR5-mediated anticancer therapy and on TRAIL/DR5-mediated immune-clearance of cancer cells.
Background
Lung cancer is the leading cause of death among non-acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) defining malignancies. Since highly active anti-retroviral therapy (HAART) has improved survival for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) patients, we evaluated lung cancer outcomes in the HAART era.
Methods
HIV-positive patients diagnosed with lung cancer in our institution during the HAART era (1995-2008) were analyzed. Patient charts were reviewed for clinical and laboratory data. CD4 count at diagnosis was treated as a continuous variable and subcategorized into distinct variables with 3 cut-off points (50, 200, & 500 μl). Pearson’s correlation coefficients were estimated for each covariate studied. Survival was determined by the Kaplan-Meier method.
Results
Out of 80 patients, 73 had non-small cell lung cancer. Baseline characteristics were: median age-52 yrs; male-80%; African American-84%; injection drug use-25%; smokers-100%; and prior exposure to antiretroviral agents-55%. Mean CD4 count and viral load were 304 μL and 82,420 copies/ml, respectively at cancer diagnosis. The latency between diagnosis of HIV and lung cancer was significantly shorter in women (4.1 yrs vs. 7.7 yrs, P=0.02) and 71% of the patients received anti-cancer therapy. The 1- and 3-year survival rates were 31% and 4% overall. Grade 3/4 toxicities occurred in 60% with chemo-radiation vs. 36% with chemotherapy. Cancer-related survival was better for patients with CD4 count >200 (P=0.0298) and >500 (P=0.0076).
Conclusions
The latency from diagnosis of HIV to lung cancer was significantly shorter for women. Although outcomes for lung cancer patients with HIV remain poor, high CD4 count is associated with an improved lung cancer-related survival.