Multiple myeloma (MM) is a malignancy that is often driven by MYC and that is sustained by IRF4, which are upregulated by super-enhancers. IKZF1 and IKZF3 bind to super-enhancers and can be degraded using immunomodulatory imide drugs (IMiD). Successful IMiD responses downregulate MYC and IRF4; however, this fails in IMiD-resistant cells. MYC and IRF4 downregulation can also be achieved in IMiD-resistant tumors using inhibitors of BET and EP300 transcriptional coactivator proteins; however, in vivo these drugs have a narrow therapeutic window. By combining IMiDs with EP300 inhibition, we demonstrate greater downregulation of MYC and IRF4, synergistic killing of myeloma in vitro and in vivo, and an increased therapeutic window. Interestingly, this potent combination failed where MYC and IRF4 expression was maintained by high levels of the AP-1 factor BATF. Our results identify an effective drug combination and a previously unrecognized mechanism of IMiD resistance. Significance: These results highlight the dependence of MM on IKZF1-bound super-enhancers, which can be effectively targeted by a potent therapeutic combination pairing IMiD-mediated degradation of IKZF1 and IKZF3 with EP300 inhibition. They also identify AP-1 factors as an unrecognized mechanism of IMiD resistance in MM.

In the randomized phase II DREAMM-2 study, single-agent belantamab mafodotin demonstrated deep and durable responses and a manageable safety profile in triple-class refractory relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). We present patient-reported outcomes (PROs) from this study for patients treated with the approved dose of belantamab mafodotin (2.5 mg/kg q3w). Disease and treatment-related symptoms, health-related quality of life (HRQOL), functioning, and patient-reported ocular changes were assessed using questionnaires (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life questionnaires EORTC-QLQ-C30 and EORTC-QLQ-MY20, Ocular Surface Disease Index [OSDI], and the National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire 25 [NEI VFQ-25]) at baseline, during treatment (every 3 or 6 weeks), and at the end of treatment (EOT). Eye examinations were conducted at baseline, prior to each treatment cycle, and at EOT. Patients reported ocular symptoms in the OSDI and NEI VFQ-25 questionnaires, with the median time to worst severity of 45 to 64 days depending on symptoms considered. Some limitations in driving and reading were reported. Ocular symptoms were improved and median time to recovery was 23.5 to 44.0 days. EORTC-QLQ-C30 data suggest core MM symptoms (including fatigue and pain), overall HRQOL, and patient functioning were maintained while patients continued belantamab mafodotin treatment, even if meaningful worsening of vision-related symptoms occurred. These PRO results, together with the clinical efficacy of belantamab mafodotin, support its use in patients with RRMM and further evaluation of its use at earlier lines of therapy.

Deeper responses are associated with longer survival in multiple myeloma (MM); however, limited data exist on the impact of response kinetics on outcomes. We investigated progression‐free survival (PFS) and duration of response (DOR) by response depth and in early (best confirmed response 0–4 months; n = 424) versus late responders (best confirmed response >4 months; n = 281). Newly diagnosed patients enrolled in TOURMALINE‐MM2 receiving ixazomib‐lenalidomide‐dexamethasone (IRd) (n = 351) or placebo‐Rd (n = 354) were evaluated post hoc. Deeper responses were associated with longer PFS (complete response [CR] not reached [NR], very good partial response [VGPR] 37.2 months, partial response [PR] 16.4 months) and DOR (CR NR, VGPR 42.6 months, PR 15.4 months). Among patients with a PFS (n = 511) or DOR (n = 484) of ≥6 months who achieved ≥PR, median PFS was prolonged among late versus early responders receiving IRd (59.7 vs. 17.9 months) or placebo‐Rd (56.6 vs. 12.4 months), as was median DOR (IRd, NR vs. 20.9 months; placebo‐Rd, 58.2 vs. 11.7 months). While the treatment paradigm for newly diagnosed MM is treatment to progression, our findings suggest slowness of response to a proteasome inhibitor‐immunomodulatory drug‐steroid combination is not a negative predictor of outcome.

To improve the outcomes of patients with the otherwise incurable hematologic malignancy of multiple myeloma (MM), a key paradigm includes initial treatment to establish disease control rapidly followed by maintenance therapy to ensure durability of response with manageable toxicity. However, patients’ prognosis worsens after relapse, and the disease burden and drug toxicities are generally more challenging with subsequent lines of therapy. It is therefore particularly important that patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) receive optimal frontline therapy. The combination of lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (RVd) has consistently demonstrated a tolerable safety profile with significant and clinically relevant benefit, including deep and durable responses with improved survival in patients with NDMM regardless of their transplant eligibility. Furthermore, comparative studies evaluating this triplet regimen against both doublet and other triplet regimens have established RVd as a standard of care in this setting based upon its remarkable and concordant efficacy. Given the breadth of clinical data, physician familiarity, inclusion in treatment guidelines, and the emerging potential of RVd-containing quadruplet regimens, RVd will likely continue as a key cornerstone of the treatment of NDMM, and its role will therefore likely continue to grow as a therapeutic backbone in the initial treatment of MM.

Treatment of refractory and/or relapsed multiple myeloma has been a challenging problem for over 20 years. However, we have made significant progress addressing this disease with the use of bortezomib, the first in class proteasome inhibitor, and the immunomodulatory agents, thalidomide and lenalidomide. Carfilzomib, the second-generation proteasome inhibitor, has also been approved for treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Carfilzomib is a highly selective and potent inhibitor of proteasome chymotrypsin-like activity. Phase I and II clinical trials have reported an acceptable toxicity profile, with manageable thrombocytopenia and anemia being the most common side effects. Peripheral neuropathy, a frequent dose-limiting side effect of bortezomib, was rare. Further, carfilzomib demonstrated encouraging single-agent activity and appeared to be effective even in patients refractory to bortezomib. Based on these promising data, carfilzomib is moving forward into Phase III trials for relapsed multiple myeloma and is also being investigated as front-line combination therapy for patients with newly diagnosed myeloma.

Isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) is important for reductive carboxylation in cancer cells, and the IDH1 R132H mutation plays a pathogenic role in cancers including acute myeloid leukemia (AML). However, the regulatory mechanisms modulating mutant and/ or wild-type (WT) IDH1 function remain unknown. Here, we show that two groups of tyrosine kinases (TK) enhance the activation of mutant and WT IDH1 through preferential Y42 or Y391 phosphorylation. Mechanistically, Y42 phosphorylation occurs in IDH1 monomers, which promotes dimer formation with enhanced substrate (isocitrate or α-ketoglutarate) binding, whereas Y42-phosphorylated dimers show attenuated disruption to monomers. Y391 phosphorylation occurs in both monomeric and dimeric IDH1, which enhances cofactor (NADP+ or NADPH) binding. Diverse oncogenic TKs phosphorylate IDH1 WT at Y42 and activate Src to phosphorylate IDH1 at Y391, which contributes to reductive carboxylation and tumor growth, whereas FLT3 or the FLT3-ITD mutation activates JAK2 to enhance mutant IDH1 activity through phosphorylation of Y391 and Y42, respectively, in AML cells. SIGNIFICANCE: We demonstrated an intrinsic connection between oncogenic TKs and activation of WT and mutant IDH1, which involves distinct TK cascades in related cancers. In particular, these results provide an additional rationale supporting the combination of FLT3 and mutant IDH1 inhibitors as a promising clinical treatment of mutant IDH1-positive AML.

Introduction: Daratumumab, a human immunoglobulin Gκ monoclonal antibody targeting CD38, is approved as monotherapy and in combination with standard-of-care regimens for multiple myeloma. In clinical studies, the median durations of the first, second, and subsequent intravenous infusions of daratumumab were 7.0, 4.3, and 3.4 h, respectively. Splitting the first intravenous infusion of daratumumab over 2 days is an approved alternative dosing regimen to reduce the duration of the first infusion and provide flexibility for patients and healthcare providers. Methods: The feasibility of splitting the first 16-mg/kg infusion into two separate infusions of 8 mg/kg on Days 1 and 2 of the first treatment cycle was investigated in two cohorts [daratumumab, carfilzomib, and dexamethasone (D-Kd) and daratumumab, carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (D-KRd)] of the phase 1b MMY1001 study. Additionally, a population pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis and simulations were used to compare the PK profiles of the split first dose regimen with the recommended single first dose regimens of daratumumab in previously approved indications. Results: In MMY1001, following administration of the second half of a split first dose on Cycle 1 Day 2, postinfusion median (range) daratumumab concentrations were similar between split first dose [D-Kd, 254.9 (125.8–435.5) µg/ml; D-KRd, 277.2 (164.0–341.8) µg/ml; combined, 256.8 (125.8–435.5) µg/ml] and single first dose [D-Kd, 319.2 (237.5–394.7) µg/ml]. At the end of weekly dosing, median (range) Cycle 3 Day 1 preinfusion daratumumab concentrations were similar between split first dose [D-Kd, 663.9 (57.7–1110.7) µg/ml; D-KRd, 575.1 (237.9–825.5) µg/ml; combined, 639.2 (57.7–1110.7) µg/ml] and single first dose [D-Kd, 463.2 (355.9–792.9) µg/ml]. The population PK simulations demonstrated virtually identical PK profiles after the first day of treatment for all approved indications and recommended dosing schedules of daratumumab. Conclusion: These data support the use of an alternative split first dose regimen of intravenous daratumumab for the treatment of MM. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01998971.

Purpose: To provide an update on recent advances in the management of patients with multiple myeloma who are not eligible for autologous stem-cell transplantation. Methods: A comprehensive review of the literature on diagnostic criteria is provided, and treatment options and management of adverse events are summarized. Results: Patients with symptomatic disease and organ damage (ie, hypercalcemia, renal failure, anemia, or bone lesions) require immediate treatment. The International Staging System and chromosomal abnormalities identify high- and standard-risk patients. Proteasome inhibitors, immunomodulatory drugs, corticosteroids, and alkylating agents are the most active agents. The presence of concomitant diseases, frailty, or disability should be assessed and, if present, treated with reduced-dose approaches. Bone disease, renal damage, hematologic toxicities, infections, thromboembolism, and peripheral neuropathy are the most frequent disabling events requiring prompt and active supportive care. Conclusion: These recommendations will help clinicians ensure the most appropriate care for patients with myeloma in everyday clinical practice.

Although prognosis for patients with multiple myeloma has improved over the past decade, research toward discovery of new therapeutic avenues is important and could lead to a cure for this plasma cell malignancy. Here we show that blocking the CD28-CD86 pathway via silencing of either CD28 or CD86 leads to myeloma cell death. Inhibiting this pathway leads to downregulation of integrins and IRF4, a known myeloma survival factor. Our data also indicate that CD86, the canonical ligand in this pathway, has prosurvival activity that is dependent on its cytosolic domain. These findings indicate that targeting of this pathway is a promising therapeutic avenue for myeloma, because it leads to modulation of different processes important in cell viability.

Daratumumab, a human CD38 imunoglobulin G 1κ monoclonal antibody, has demonstrated clinical activity and a manageable safety profile in monotherapy and combination therapy clinical trials in relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma. CD38 is expressed at high levels on myeloma cells and, to a lesser extent, on immune effector cells, including natural killer (NK) cells, which are important for daratumumab-mediated antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC). Here, the pharmacodynamic effects of daratumumab monotherapy on NK cells, and the effect of NK cell dynamics on daratumumab efficacy and safety, were assessed. Daratumumab, like other CD38 antibodies, reduced NK-cell counts in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) of healthy donors in vitro. Data on NK-cell counts, clinical efficacy, and adverse events were pooled from two single-agent daratumumab studies, GEN501 and SIRIUS. In daratumumab-treated myeloma patients, total and activated NK-cell counts reduced rapidly in peripheral blood after the first dose, remained low over the course of treatment, and recovered after treatment ended. There was a clear maximum effect relationship between daratumumab dose and maximum reduction in NK cells. Similar reductions were observed in bone marrow. PBMCs from daratumumab-treated patients induced lysis by ADCC of CD38+ tumor cells in vitro, suggesting that the remaining NK cells retained cytotoxic functionality. There was no relationship between NK-cell count reduction and the efficacy or safety profile of daratumumab. Furthermore, although NK cell numbers are reduced after daratumumab treatment, they are not completely depleted and may still contribute to ADCC, clinical efficacy, and infection control.