The application of immunotherapies such as chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T therapy or bi-specific T cell engager (BiTE) therapy to manage myeloid malignancies has proven more challenging than for B-cell malignancies. This is attributed to a shortage of leukemia-specific cell-surface antigens that distinguish healthy from malignant myeloid populations, and the inability to manage myeloid depletion unlike B-cell aplasia. Therefore, the development of targeted therapeutics for myeloid malignancies, such as acute myeloid leukemia (AML), requires new approaches. Herein, we developed a ligand-based CAR and secreted bi-specific T cell engager (sBite) to target c-kit using its cognate ligand, stem cell factor (SCF). c-kit is highly expressed on AML blasts and correlates with resistance to chemotherapy and poor prognosis, making it an ideal candidate for which to develop targeted therapeutics. We utilize γδ T cells as a cytotoxic alternative to αβ T cells and a transient transfection system as both a safety precaution and switch to remove alloreactive modified cells that may hinder successful transplant. Additionally, the use of γδ T cells permits its use as an allogeneic, off-the-shelf therapeutic. To this end, we show mSCF CAR- and hSCF sBite-modified γδ T cells are proficient in killing c-kit+ AML cell lines and sca-1+ murine bone marrow cells in vitro. In vivo, hSCF sBite-modified γδ T cells moderately extend survival of NSG mice engrafted with disseminated AML, but therapeutic efficacy is limited by lack of γδ T-cell homing to murine bone marrow. Together, these data demonstrate preclinical efficacy and support further investigation of SCF-based γδ T-cell therapeutics for the treatment of myeloid malignancies.

Natural Killer (NK) cells form an integral component of the immune response, especially against virally infected cells and cancer cells (1). They have gained diagnostic and prognostic significance in the last few decades with increasing literature portraying their role in inflammatory disease pathology and therapy (2, 3). However, even though these cells have importance in research set-up, this significance has not yet reached routine clinical set-up. Various inherited genetic defects, pathological conditions, and therapies are known to have immunosuppressive effects on NK cells, causing NK cell defects (4, 5). However, in many of these cases, the mechanism remains unclear. This could be attributed to the lack of studies focusing on NK cell immune biology, the influence of varied pathological conditions on its immune phenotype and functions; and its impact on outcome. In the future, translation of this knowledge from “bench-to-bedside” will definitely contribute to better diagnosis and therapeutics in multiple pathological conditions. Thus, the main focus of this Research Topic was to explore recent advances in understanding NK cell defects, their diagnosis, and their treatment. In total, after being peer-review, 4 manuscripts, composed of 3 research articles and 1 review article from 28 researchers were successfully accepted for publication.

Background Immune-mediated lung injury and systemic hyperinflammation are characteristic of severe and critical coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in adults. Although the majority of SARS-CoV-2 infections in pediatric populations result in minimal or mild COVID-19 in the acute phase of infection, a small subset of children develop severe and even critical disease in this phase with concomitant inflammation that may benefit from immunomodulation. Therefore, guidance is needed regarding immunomodulatory therapies in the setting of acute pediatric COVID-19. This document does not provide guidance regarding the recently emergent multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C). Methods A multidisciplinary panel of pediatric subspecialty physicians and pharmacists with expertise in infectious diseases, rheumatology, hematology/oncology, and critical care medicine was convened. Guidance statements were developed based on best available evidence and expert opinion. Results The panel devised a framework for considering the use of immunomodulatory therapy based on an assessment of clinical disease severity and degree of multi-organ involvement combined with evidence of hyperinflammation. Additionally, the known rationale for consideration of each immunomodulatory approach and the associated risks and benefits was summarized. Conclusions Immunomodulatory therapy is not recommended for the majority of pediatric patients, who typically develop mild or moderate COVID-19. For children with severe or critical illness, the use of immunomodulatory agents may be beneficial. The risks and benefits of such therapies are variable and should be evaluated on a case-by-case basis with input from appropriate specialty services. When available, the panel strongly favors immunomodulatory agent use within the context of clinical trials. The framework presented herein offers an approach to decision-making regarding immunomodulatory therapy for severe or critical pediatric COVID-19 and is informed by currently available data, while awaiting results of placebo-controlled randomized clinical trials.

Editorial on the Research Topic Dermatologic manifestations of primary immune deficiency disorders in children The introduction of genetic-based diagnosis incorporated with advanced molecular workup has revolutionized the field of primary immune deficiency disorders (PIDD). Number of PIDD is constantly increasing and the 2022 International Union of Immunological Societies (IUIS) update classifies 485 genetic disorders as PIDD (1). Corresponding with advances in PIDD diagnoses, the clinical spectrum of each PIDD is also expanding.

The clinical utility of monitoring immune reconstitution after allotransplant was evaluated using data from Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network BMT CTN 0201 (NCT00075816), a multicenter randomized study of unrelated donor bone marrow (BM) vs granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF)-mobilized blood stem cell (G-PB) grafts. Among 410 patients with posttransplant flow cytometry measurements of immune cell subsets, recipients of G-PB grafts had faster T-cell reconstitution than BM recipients, including more naive CD4+ T cells and T-cell receptor excision circle-positive CD41 and CD8+ T cells at 3 months, consistent with better thymic function. Faster reconstitution of CD4+ T cells and naive CD4+ T cells at 1 month and CD8+ T cells at 3 months predicted more chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) but better survival in G-PB recipients, but consistent associations of T-cell amounts with GVHD or survival were not seen in BM recipients. In contrast, a higher number of classical dendritic cells (cDCs) in blood samples at 3 months predicted better survival in BM recipients. Functional T-cell immunity measured in vitro by cytokine secretion in response to stimulation with cytomegalovirus peptides was similar when comparing blood samples from BM and G-PB recipients, but the degree to which acute GVHD suppressed immune reconstitution varied according to graft source. BM, but not G-PB, recipients with a history of grades 2-4 acute GVHD had lower numbers of B cells, plasmacytoid dendritic cells, and cDCs at 3 months. Thus, early measurements of T-cell reconstitution are predictive cellular biomarkers for long-term survival and response to GVHD therapy in G-PB recipients, whereas more robust DC reconstitution predicted better survival in BM recipients.

Background: Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA) is an autoimmune disease with a heterogenous clinical presentation and unpredictable response to available therapies. This personalized transcriptomics study sought proof-of-concept for single-cell RNA sequencing to characterize patient-specific immune profiles. Methods: Whole blood samples from six untreated children, newly diagnosed with JIA, and two healthy controls were cultured for 24 h with or without ex vivo TNF stimulation and subjected to scRNAseq to examine cellular populations and transcript expression in PBMCs. A novel analytical pipeline, scPool, was developed wherein cells are first pooled into pseudocells prior to expression analysis, facilitating variance partitioning of the effects of TNF stimulus, JIA disease status, and individual donor. Results: Seventeen robust immune cell-types were identified, the abundance of which was significantly affected by TNF stimulus, which resulted in notable elevation of memory CD8 + T-cells and NK56 cells, but down-regulation of naïve B-cell proportions. Memory CD8 + and CD4 + T-cells were also both reduced in the JIA cases relative to two controls. Significant differential expression responses to TNF stimulus were also characterized, with monocytes showing more transcriptional shifts than T-lymphocyte subsets, while the B-cell response was more limited. We also show that donor variability exceeds the small degree of possible intrinsic differentiation between JIA and control profiles. An incidental finding of interest was association of HLA-DQA2 and HLA-DRB5 expression with JIA status. Conclusions: These results support the development of personalized immune-profiling combined with ex-vivo immune stimulation for evaluation of patient-specific modes of immune cell activity in autoimmune rheumatic disease.

Introduction: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a multisystem autoimmune disease that is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. SLE disproportionately affects women and minorities. Childhood-onset SLE (cSLE) in particular tends to be more aggressive than adult-onset SLE. Despite substantial improvements in the treatment of cSLE, there is significant variability in treatment responses and long-term outcomes. Furthermore, there is a paucity of studies involving cSLE, and in particular, cSLE among different age groups. The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that an early-onset cSLE cohort would demonstrate unique characteristics with distinctive clinical and laboratory features at disease onset. We specifically investigated whether clinical, epidemiological, or serological factors are differentially associated with early- and late-onset cSLE. This could have direct impact on clinical management with the goal of improving outcomes and quality of life for children with SLE. Methods: Our study was conducted at a large tertiary center. We included 213 subjects seen at our pediatric rheumatology clinic aged 4–17 years. Epidemiologic, clinical phenotype, disease severity, serology, treatment, and outcome data were compared between subjects with cSLE onset prior to 10 years of age (early-onset disease, n = 43) and those with cSLE onset greater than 10 years of age (peri-adolescent disease, n = 170). We compared clinical features between early- and peri-adolescent onset cSLE in order to investigate the association between age at disease onset of cSLE and clinical disease expression and outcomes. Results: Of the 213 subjects with cSLE in our study, 43 subjects had early-onset disease (age 2 to ≤9 years) and 170 patients had peri-adolescent onset disease. We found that early-onset cSLE was associated with a higher prevalence of positive anti-dsDNA antibody at cSLE diagnosis, higher anti-dsDNA antibody titer at cSLE diagnosis, rash, and azathioprine use (p < 0.001, p = 0.004, p = 0.011, and p = 0.008, respectively). In contrast, we found that peri-adolescent onset cSLE (≥10 years of age) was associated with worse disease activity (SLEDAI range 0–24) (p < 0.001), higher SLICC at diagnosis (p < 0.001), as well as a higher rate of mycophenolate mofetil and hydroxychloroquine use (p = 0.003 and p < 0.001, respectively). There were no significant differences in the prevalence of neuropsychiatric symptoms or the development of Class IV/Class V lupus nephritis between the early-onset and peri-adolescent groups.

Data are limited regarding the immune status of CD40 ligand (CD40L)-deficient carriers and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) outcomes using them as donors for CD40L-deficient patients. Therefore, we studied the immune profiles of 7 carriers, 4 of whom were HSCT donors for family members with CD40L deficiency, and we characterized their HSCT outcomes. Immunoglobulin profiles, CD4, CD8, circulating T-follicular helper (cTfh) cells, and regulatory T cells (Tregs) in carriers were comparable to those in healthy controls. CD40L expression in carriers ranged from 37% to 78%. cTfh cells from carriers expressed higher CD40L compared with total CD4 cells or the memory CD4 compartment, suggesting a potential advantage to CD40L-expressing cTfh cells. Tregs had minimal CD40L expression in carriers and healthy controls. So we postulated that HSCT using donors who were CD40L carriers may result in excellent immune reconstitution without immune dysregulation. Four CD40L-deficient patients underwent HSCT from carriers who had CD40L expression from 37% to 63%. All patients engrafted, achieved excellent immune reconstitution with lack of opportunistic infections, graft-versus-host disease, and immune dysregulation; stable CD40L expression mimicked that of donors 1 to 5 years after HSCT. Immunoglobulin independence was achieved in 3 of the 4 patients. We demonstrated higher CD40L expression in the cTfh compartment of carriers and excellent immune reconstitution using donors who were CD40L carriers in CD40L-deficient patients.

BACKGROUND: There are few reports of COVID-19 in pediatric patients with rheumatic diseases. This study describes the clinical presentation and outcomes of COVID-19 in this population. METHODS: We analyzed a single-center case series of pediatric patients with rheumatic diseases and laboratory-confirmed COVID-19. Demographic, baseline and COVID-19 associated clinical features were compared between ambulatory and hospitalized patients using univariate analysis. RESULTS: Fifty-five cases were identified: 45 (81.8%) in the ambulatory group and 10 (18.2%) hospitalized. African American race (OR 7.78; 95% CI [1.46-55.38]; p = 0.006) and cardiovascular disease (OR 19.40; 95% CI 2.45-254.14; p = 0.001) predominated in hospitalized patients. Active rheumatic disease (OR 11.83; 95% CI 1.43-558.37; p = 0.01), medium/high-dose corticosteroid use (OR 14.12; 95% CI [2.31-106.04]; p = 0.001), mycophenolate use (OR 8.84; 95% CI [1.64-63.88]; p = 0.004), rituximab use (OR 19.40; 95% CI [2.45-254.14]; p = 0.001) and severe immunosuppression (OR 34.80; 95% CI [3.94-1704.26]; p = < 0.001) were associated with increased odds of hospitalization. Fever (OR 7.78; 95% CI [1.46-55.38]; p = 0.006), dyspnea (OR 26.28; 95% CI [2.17-1459.25]; p = 0.003), chest pain (OR 13.20; 95% CI [1.53-175.79]; p = 0.007), and rash (OR 26.28; 95% CI [2.17-1459.25]; p = 0.003) were more commonly observed in hospitalized patients. Rheumatic disease flares were almost exclusive to hospitalized patients (OR 55.95; 95% CI [5.16-3023.74]; p < 0.001).. One patient did not survive. CONCLUSIONS: Medium/high-dose corticosteroid, mycophenolate and rituximab use, and severe immunosuppression were risk factors for hospitalization. Fever, dyspnea, chest pain, and rash were high-risk symptoms for hospitalization. Rheumatic disease activity and flare could contribute to the need for hospitalization.

A paucity of effector T cells within tumors renders pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) resistant to immune checkpoint therapies. While several under-development approaches target immune-suppressive cells in the tumor microenvironment, there is less focus on improving T cell function. Here we show that inhibiting vasoactive intestinal peptide receptor (VIP-R) signaling enhances anti-tumor immunity in murine PDAC models. In silico data mining and immunohistochemistry analysis of primary tumors indicate overexpression of the neuropeptide vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) in human PDAC tumors. Elevated VIP levels are also present in PDAC patient plasma and supernatants of cultured PDAC cells. Furthermore, T cells up-regulate VIP receptors after activation, identifying the VIP signaling pathway as a potential target to enhance T cell function. In mouse PDAC models, VIP-R antagonist peptides synergize with anti-PD-1 antibody treatment in improving T cell recruitment into the tumors, activation of tumor-antigen-specific T cells, and inhibition of T cell exhaustion. In contrast to the limited single-agent activity of anti-PD1 antibodies or VIP-R antagonist peptides, combining both therapies eliminate tumors in up to 40% of animals. Furthermore, tumor-free mice resist tumor re-challenge, indicating anti-cancer immunological memory generation. VIP-R signaling thus represents a tumor-protective immune-modulatory pathway that is targetable in PDAC.