Objectives: Coronavirus disease 2019 is associated with high mortality rates and multiple organ damage. There is increasing evidence that these patients are at risk for various cardiovascular insults; however, there are currently no guidelines for the diagnosis and management of such cardiovascular complications in patients with coronavirus disease 2019. We share data and recommendations from a multidisciplinary team to highlight our institution's clinical experiences and guidelines for managing cardiovascular complications of coronavirus disease 2019. Design Setting and Patients: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients admitted to one of six ICUs dedicated to the care of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 located in three hospitals within one academic medical center in Atlanta, Georgia. Measurements/Interventions: Chart review was conducted for sociodemographic, laboratory, and clinical data. Rates of specific cardiovascular complications were assessed, and data were analyzed using a chi-square or Wilcoxon rank-sum test for categorical and continuous variables. Additionally, certain cases are presented to demonstrate the sub committee's recommendations. Main Results: Two-hundred eighty-eight patients were admitted to the ICU with coronavirus disease 2019. Of these, 86 died (29.9%), 242 (84.03%) had troponin elevation, 70 (24.31%) had dysrhythmias, four (1.39%) had ST-elevation myocardial infarction, eight (2.78%) developed cor pulmonale, and 190 (65.97%) with shock. There was increased mortality risk in patients with greater degrees of troponin elevation (p < 0.001) and with the development of arrhythmias (p < 0.001), cor pulmonale (p < 0.001), and shock (p < 0.001). Conclusions: While there are guidelines for the diagnosis and management of pulmonary complications of coronavirus disease 2019, there needs to be more information regarding the management of cardiovascular complications as well. These recommendations garnered from the coronavirus disease 2019 cardiology subcommittee from our institution will add to the existing knowledge of these potential cardiovascular insults as well as highlight suggestions for the diagnosis and management of the range of cardiovascular complications of coronavirus disease 2019. Additionally, with the spread of coronavirus disease 2019, our case-based recommendations provide a bedside resource for providers newly caring for patients with coronavirus disease 2019.
BACKGROUND: Accurate serological assays can improve the early diagnosis of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, but few studies have compared performance characteristics between assays in symptomatic and recovered patients. METHODS: We recruited 32 patients who had 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19; 18 hospitalized and actively symptomatic, 14 recovered mild cases), and measured levels of IgM (against the full-length S1 or the highly homologous SARS-CoV E protein) and IgG (against S1 receptor binding domain [RBD]). We performed the same analysis in 103 pre-2020 healthy adult control (HC) participants and 13 participants who had negative molecular testing for SARS-CoV-2. RESULTS: Anti-S1-RBD IgG levels were very elevated within days of symptom onset for hospitalized patients (median 2.04 optical density [OD], vs. 0.12 in HC). People who recovered from milder COVID-19 only reached similar IgG levels 28 days after symptom onset. IgM levels were elevated early in both groups (median 1.91 and 2.12 vs. 1.14 OD in HC for anti-S1 IgM, 2.23 and 2.26 vs 1.52 in HC for anti-E IgM), with downward trends in hospitalized cases having longer disease duration. The combination of the two IgM levels showed similar sensitivity for COVID-19 as IgG but greater specificity, and identified 4/10 people (vs. 3/10 by IgG) with prior symptoms and negative molecular testing to have had COVID-19. CONCLUSIONS: Disease severity and timing both influence levels of IgM and IgG against SARS-CoV-2, with IgG better for early detection of severe cases but IgM more suited for early detection of milder cases.
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccines confer great protection against symptomatic and severe coronavirus disease (COVID-19) in healthy adults, but little is known for specialized patient populations despite billions of doses given worldwide. Asthma is one of the most common chronic respiratory diseases and affects approximately 25 million people in the United States alone. There are currently six U.S. Food and Drug Administration–approved biologic therapies for the treatment of asthma, with some that target cytokines critical for asthma pathogenesis, but inhibition of these cytokines may also negatively affect B cell to plasma cell differentiation, somatic hypermutation in the germinal centers, and long-lived plasma cell generation and maintenance potentially through eosinophil depletion (1–3). Despite animal studies showing decreased vaccine-induced humoral immunity without these cytokines (4, 5), there is a paucity of literature available in this patient population following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination.
Troubling disparities in COVID-19–associated mortality emerged early, with nearly 70% of deaths confined to Black/African American (AA) patients in some areas. However, targeted studies on this vulnerable population are scarce. Here, we applied multiomics single-cell analyses of immune profiles from matching airways and blood samples of Black/AA patients during acute SARS-CoV-2 infection. Transcriptional reprogramming of infiltrating IFITM2+/S100A12+ mature neutrophils, likely recruited via the IL-8/CXCR2 axis, leads to persistent and self-sustaining pulmonary neutrophilia with advanced features of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) despite low viral load in the airways. In addition, exacerbated neutrophil production of IL-8, IL-1β, IL-6, and CCL3/4, along with elevated levels of neutrophil elastase and myeloperoxidase, were the hallmarks of transcriptionally active and pathogenic airway neutrophilia. Although our analysis was limited to Black/AA patients and was not designed as a comparative study across different ethnicities, we present an unprecedented in-depth analysis of the immunopathology that leads to acute respiratory distress syndrome in a well-defined patient population disproportionally affected by severe COVID-19.
by
Natalie S. Haddad;
Doan Nguyen;
Merin E. Kurvilla;
Andrea Morrison-Porter;
Fabliha Anam;
Kevin S. Cashman;
Richard Ramonell;
Shuya Kyu;
Ankur Saini;
Monica Cabrera-Mora;
Andrew Derrico;
David Alter;
John Roback;
Michael Horwath;
James O'Keefe;
Henry Wu;
An-Kwok Ian Wong;
Alexandra Dretler;
Ria Gripaldo;
Andrea N. Lane;
Hao Wu;
Helen Y. Chu;
Saeyun Lee;
Mindy Hernandez;
Vanessa Engineer;
John Varghese;
Rahul Patel;
Anum Jalal;
Victoria French;
Ilya Guysenov;
Christopher E. Lane;
Tesfaye Mengistsu;
Katherine Elizabeth Normile;
Onike Mnzava;
Sang Le;
Ignacio Sanz;
John L. Daiss;
Frances Eun-Hyung Lee
SARS-CoV-2 has caused over 100,000,000 cases and almost 2,500,000 deaths globally. Comprehensive assessment of the multifaceted antiviral Ab response is critical for diagnosis, differentiation of severity, and characterization of long-term immunity, especially as COVID-19 vaccines become available. Severe disease is associated with early, massive plasmablast responses. We developed a multiplex immunoassay from serum/plasma of acutely infected and convalescent COVID-19 patients and prepandemic and postpandemic healthy adults. We measured IgA, IgG, and/or IgM against SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid (N), spike domain 1 (S1), S1–receptor binding domain (RBD) and S1–N-terminal domain. For diagnosis, the combined [IgA + IgG + IgM] or IgG levels measured for N, S1, and S1-RBD yielded area under the curve values ≥0.90. Virus-specific Ig levels were higher in patients with severe/critical compared with mild/moderate infections. A strong prozone effect was observed in sera from severe/critical patients—a possible source of underestimated Ab concentrations in previous studies. Mild/moderate patients displayed a slower rise and lower peak in anti-N and anti-S1 IgG levels compared with severe/critical patients, but anti-RBD IgG and neutralization responses reached similar levels at 2–4 mo after symptom onset. Measurement of the Ab responses in sera from 18 COVID-19–vaccinated patients revealed specific responses for the S1-RBD Ag and none against the N protein. This highly sensitive, SARS-CoV-2–specific, multiplex immunoassay measures the magnitude, complexity, and kinetics of the Ab response and can distinguish serum Ab responses from natural SARS-CoV-2 infections (mild or severe) and mRNA COVID-19 vaccines.
Venovenous (VV) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is a form of mechanical support used in respiratory failure refractory to conventional medical management. Because VV ECMO cannulation is an uncommonly performed, time-sensitive, and high-stakes procedure (1), simulation can be used to improve the procedural competency of trainees. Simulation-based training (SBT) has been shown to improve proficiency of vascular cannulation (2–5), yet there are few low-fidelity, low-cost, portable models that allow physicians-in-training to practice venous cannulation with an ECMO cannula. Most ECMO simulators are high-fidelity, software-based, interactive models (6–9). Because of the cost-prohibitive nature of such models, some nonhuman tissue models were developed for use in procedural skills laboratories for vascular access training, with promising improvements in procedural comfort and skill being shown (10). However, noncommercial simulators in the medical education literature are generally used to teach trainees management of intact ECMO circuits (11–13) or generally combine cannulation SBT with circuit management training (14, 15). Therefore, although these simulators may serve specific roles in ECMO SBT, they may not be as useful for the acquisition of skills related to venous cannula insertion. To address this educational need, we conducted an observational pilot study in which we developed a low-fidelity, low-cost, portable, gelatin-based model intended for use by trainees in preparation for VV ECMO initiation.
Background Streptococcus pneumoniae infections cause morbidity and mortality worldwide. A rapid, simple diagnostic method could reduce the time needed to introduce definitive therapy potentially improving patient outcomes. Methods We introduce two new methods for diagnosing S. pneumoniae infections by measuring the presence of newly activated, pathogen-specific, circulating Antibody Secreting Cells (ASC). First, ASC were detected by ELISpot assays that measure cells secreting antibodies specific for signature antigens. Second, the antibodies secreted by isolated ASC were collected in vitro in a novel matrix, MENSA (media enriched with newly synthesized antibodies) and antibodies against S. pneumoniae antigens were measured using Luminex immunoassays. Each assay was evaluated using blood from S. pneumoniae and non-S. pneumoniae-infected adult patients. Results We enrolled 23 patients with culture-confirmed S. pneumoniae infections and 24 controls consisting of 12 non-S. pneumoniae infections, 10 healthy donors and two colonized with S. pneumoniae. By ELISpot assays, twenty-one of 23 infected patients were positive, and all 24 controls were negative. Using MENSA samples, four of five S. pneumoniae-infected patients were positive by Luminex immunoassays while all five non-S. pneumoniae-infected patients were negative. Conclusion Specific antibodies produced by activated ASC may provide a simple diagnostic for ongoing S. pneumoniae infections. This method has the potential to diagnose acute bacterial infections.
Peripheral T-cell lymphoma, not otherwise specified (PTCL, NOS) is an aggressive subtype of T-cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Despite the poor prognosis associated with PTCL, NOS, prompt diagnosis and treatment are critical to prevent further morbidity and mortality.1 We report a case of new-onset asthma with peripheral eosinophilia, subsequently diagnosed with PTCL, highlighting the need to consider a broad differential in the setting of uncontrolled atypical respiratory symptoms.
Severe SARS-CoV-2 infection1 has been associated with highly inflammatory immune activation since the earliest days of the COVID-19 pandemic2–5. More recently, these responses have been associated with the emergence of self-reactive antibodies with pathologic potential6–10, although their origins and resolution have remained unclear11. Previously, we and others have identified extrafollicular B cell activation, a pathway associated with the formation of new autoreactive antibodies in chronic autoimmunity12,13, as a dominant feature of severe and critical COVID-19 (refs. 14–18). Here, using single-cell B cell repertoire analysis of patients with mild and severe disease, we identify the expansion of a naive-derived, low-mutation IgG1 population of antibody-secreting cells (ASCs) reflecting features of low selective pressure. These features correlate with progressive, broad, clinically relevant autoreactivity, particularly directed against nuclear antigens and carbamylated proteins, emerging 10–15 days after the onset of symptoms. Detailed analysis of the low-selection compartment shows a high frequency of clonotypes specific for both SARS-CoV-2 and autoantigens, including pathogenic autoantibodies against the glomerular basement membrane. We further identify the contraction of this pathway on recovery, re-establishment of tolerance standards and concomitant loss of acute-derived ASCs irrespective of antigen specificity. However, serological autoreactivity persists in a subset of patients with postacute sequelae, raising important questions as to the contribution of emerging autoreactivity to continuing symptomology on recovery. In summary, this study demonstrates the origins, breadth and resolution of autoreactivity in severe COVID-19, with implications for early intervention and the treatment of patients with post-COVID sequelae.
The heterogeneity of well-defined type 2 (T2) asthma is reflected by the lack of uniform response to T2 blockade despite the recruitment of patients with a strong T2 signal. The fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) is a biomarker elevated in uncontrolled T2 asthma secondary to interleukin (IL)-13–induced nitric oxide synthase expression in the airway epithelium. Although FeNO is reduced by anti–immunoglobulin E (IgE) and anti–IL-4/13 therapies,1–5 it did not change in studies with mepolizumab, suggesting the lack of modulation by anti-eosinophil therapy.6