Extranodal natural killer (NK)/T-cell lymphoma, nasal type, is a rare peripheral T-cell lymphoma associated with Epstein-Barr virus. It most often presents as limited-stage disease in patients of East Asian descent with a palatal deformity caused by erosion of the tumor through the hard palate. Limited-stage disease is often curable with the use of l-asparaginase-based chemotherapy and high-dose radiation therapy. Obtaining an accurate diagnosis is essential, because treatment with standard lymphoma regimens and omission of radiation severely compromise the likelihood of long-term survival. Conversely, patients with advanced disease have a poor prognosis and are recommended for asparaginase-based chemotherapy followed by consolidation with autologous transplantation as a potentially curative approach. Progress often has been hampered by the rarity of this disease. However, discovery of common genetic alterations in pathways that promote growth and inhibit apoptosis, and actionable markers such as CD30 (among others), have begun to broaden the availability of novel drugs (eg, targeted therapies). There is also cautious optimism about immunotherapies, such as checkpoint blockade and novel cellular therapies that target Epstein-Barr virus. Advances in treatment and understanding of the genetic landscape of this disease offer hope for improved treatment outcomes.
Patients with CTCL are at increased risk for bacteremia which is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality. We assessed risk factors for and the impact of bacteremia on survival in a retrospective cohort of 188 CTCL patients at a single US academic institution treated between 1990 and 2018. With a median follow up of 6.2 years, 20% of patients (n = 36) developed 79 bacteremia events. Risk factors for bacteremia included advanced stage, female gender, African American (AA) race, invasive lines, and chemotherapy. Bacteremia was associated with an increased risk of death on univariate and multivariable models. Bacteremia is associated with an increased risk of death in patients with CTCL. The greatest avoidable risk factors included chemotherapy treatment and presence of an invasive line.Key points 20% of patients developed bacteremia at any point in time in this analysis. Bacteremia is associated with an increased risk of death in patients with CTCL Risk factors for bacteremia include advanced stage, female gender, AA race, invasive line, and chemotherapy.
BACKGROUND:
Cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) is a rare form of non-Hodgkin lymphoma arising in the skin. Geographic clustering of CTCL has recently been reported, but its association with environmental factors is unknown. Benzene and trichloroethylene (TCE) are environmental toxins with carcinogenic properties. The authors investigated associations between geographic clustering of CTCL incidence in the state of Georgia with benzene and TCE exposure.
METHODS:
The statewide county-level incidence of CTCL within Georgia was obtained from the Georgia Cancer Registry for the years 1999 to 2015. Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) were calculated by dividing observed cases by expected cases using national incidence rates by age, sex, and race. Clustering of CTCL was analyzed using spatial analyses. County-level concentrations of benzene and TCE between 1996 and 2014 were collected from the Environmental Protection Agency’s National Air Toxics Assessment database. Linear regression analyses on CTCL incidence were performed comparing SIRs with levels of benzene and TCE by county.
RESULTS:
There was significant geographic clustering of CTCL in Georgia, particularly around Atlanta, which was correlated with an increased concentration of benzene and TCE exposure. Among the 4 most populous counties in Georgia, CTCL incidence was between 1.2 and 1.9 times higher than the state average, and benzene and TCE levels were between 2.9 and 8.8 times higher.
CONCLUSIONS:
The current results demonstrate nonrandom geographic clustering of CTCL incidence in Georgia. To the authors’ knowledge, this is the first analysis to identify a correlation between geographic clustering of CTCL and environmental toxic exposures.
Introduction:
Influenza infection causes significant morbidity and mortality in patients with cancer, and annual influenza vaccination for individuals with cancer is recommended. We sought to examine the documentation rate of influenza vaccine administration, refusal, or counseling in the first year after diagnosis of diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) for patients across 3 hospitals in 2 health care systems.
Patients and Methods:
Documentation of vaccine administration, refusal, or counseling by physicians, advanced practice providers, or nursing staff during the first period of influenza vaccine availability after diagnosis (August to April) was assessed in medical records of patients diagnosed with DLBCL between February 2015 and October 2017 who presented to Emory St. Joseph Hospital (community hospital), Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University (academic medical center), or Grady Memorial Hospital (county hospital).
Results:
Of the 57% (61/107) of newly diagnosed patients with DLBCL who had vaccine-related documentation, 43% refused vaccination. Counseling was not documented for any patient. Inpatient nursing performed 75% of all documentation. Primary oncologists documented vaccination in 4% of all cases.
Conclusion:
Despite the limited immunization documentation and high refusal rates observed in this study, the influenza vaccine refusal rate was lower than the average for the United States, the state of Georgia, and the previous studies of patients with cancer. Although routine outpatient vaccination occurs, improvements in screening, strategies for sharing patient vaccine-related information, and counseling of patients who refuse the vaccine are needed. Further work is also needed to determine the effectiveness of influenza vaccination in patients receiving anti-cancer therapy. Annual influenza vaccination is recommended for patients with cancer. We assessed documentation on influenza vaccine administration, refusal, or counseling in medical records of 114 patients with a newly diagnosed lymphoma. Of the 57% of patients who had vaccine-related documentation, 43% refused vaccination. Counseling was not documented for any patient. Strategies to improve documentation and counseling are needed to improve patient care.
Hodgkin lymphoma is a highly curable malignancy in early and advanced stages. Most patients are diagnosed in their teens or twenties and are expected to live decades beyond their treatment. Therefore, the toxicity of treatment must be balanced with the goal of cure. Thus, treatment has been refined through prognostic models and positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT)-directed therapy. Stratification by prognostic models defines groups of patients with favorable characteristics who may be treated with less intensive therapy upfront, including fewer cycles of chemotherapy, lower doses of radiation, or omission of radiation altogether. Alternatively, high-risk patients may be assigned to a more aggressive initial approach. The modern use of interim PET-CT allows further tailoring of treatment by response.
Since 2012, the FDA has approved 88 new oncologic therapies or indications, including 28 drugs for hematologic malignancies (centerwatch.com/drug-information/fda-approved). Correspondingly, the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program reported a 20% decline in the overall cancer-attributable death rate over the past three decades.1 However, improvements in cancer therapy has been accompanied by a boom in health care expenditures from 125 billion in 2010, to a projected 173 billion by the year 20202. New drugs carry a wide range of expected therapeutic efficacy at the expense of increased cost for patients and payers. The shifting dynamics of novel therapies and increasing cost, have brought the concept of “value” to center stage. The meaning of value in reference to cancer treatment differs substantially from the patient, physician, and payer point of view, with different weights added to improvements survival, convenience, side effects, and cost.
Introduction: Inhibitors against the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway are revolutionizing the treatment and management of malignancies. Areas covered: We summarize our current understanding of the function of PD-1, its role in immune evasion, the clinical data available that support the use of PD-1 antagonist in Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphomas, and potential predictors of response. Expert opinion: We anticipate that in the next 10 years, agents that modulate the immune system such as PD-1 antagonists will be increasingly used in favor over traditional cytotoxic chemotherapeutic agents. PD-1 antagonists will be combined with future immunotherapies or used as adjuncts to cellular therapy to boost tumor-specific immune responses.
Peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCLs) are an aggressive and diverse group of lymphomas with a T-cell origin. Most patients progress following initial treatment and require salvage therapy. The burden of symptoms is high due to its extra-nodal presentation, high rate of advanced disease, and associated cytopenias combined with its predilection for an elderly population. The disease is generally incurable at relapse in the absence of transplantation and treatment is aimed at prolonging life and reducing disease-related symptoms. Belinostat is a histone deacetylate inhibitor that was granted accelerated approval by the US Food and Drug Administration on July 3, 2014, for the treatment of relapsed PTCL. Here, a systemic review was conducted to assess the safety and efficacy of belinostat. A safety analysis involved 512 patients with relapsed malignancies, and an efficacy analysis focused on patients with relapsed PTCL and included a total of 144 patients. Common adverse events were noted including fatigue (35%), nausea (42.8%), and vomiting (28.5%), but comparatively low rates of grade 3/4 hematologic toxicity overall (6.4%). Efficacy analysis demonstrated an overall response rate of 25.7% and complete responses of 10.4% with the majority of discontinuations occurring for lack of efficacy. Ultimately, these results demonstrate that belinostat has comparable efficacy to other agents used in this setting and is well tolerated in regard to hematologic events, but there is limited data on patient-reported outcomes, reduction in disease-related symptoms, or quality of life.