Objective: Risk factors for major adverse events late after Fontan palliation are unknown. Prior studies have suggested ventricular function and morphology as important risk factors. The aim of this study is to (1) characterize the late major adverse event profile in adult Fontan patients and (2) identify additional risk factors that may contribute to adverse outcomes. Design and Setting: A retrospective review of all adult patients >15 years post-Fontan seen at a tertiary academic center was conducted. Clinical, laboratory, cardiac data, and abdominal imaging were collected via chart review. Major adverse events (death, cardiac transplantation, or listing) were identified, and timing of events was plotted using Kaplan-Meier methods. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression was used to determine independent predictors of late-term events. Results: A total of 123 adult Fontan patients were identified (mean time post-Fontan 22.4 years [±4.4]). Major adverse events occurred in 19/123 patients (15%). In this 15-year survivor cohort, transplant-free survival rates were 94.6%, 82.9%, and 59.8% at 20, 25, and 30 years postoperation, respectively. Modes of death were Fontan failure with preserved function (4), congestive heart failure with decreased function (2), sudden death (2), thromboembolic event (1), post-Fontan conversion (2), and posttransplant (2). No differences in adverse outcomes were found based on morphology of the systemic ventricle, Fontan type, or systolic ventricular function. On the other hand, features of portal hypertension (OR 19.0, CI 4.7-77.3, P < .0001), presence of a pacemaker (OR 13.4, CI 2.6-69.8, P=.002), and systemic oxygen desaturation (OR 0.86, CI 0.75-0.98, P=.02) were risk factors for major adverse events in the multivariate analysis. Conclusions: In adult Fontan patients surviving >15 years post-Fontan, portal hypertension, oxygen desaturation, and need for pacemaker were predictive of adverse events. Traditional measures may not predict late-term outcomes in adult survivors; further study of the liver's role in late outcomes is warranted.

Advances in treatment and early revascularization have led to improved outcomes for patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). However, elderly ACS patients are less likely to receive evidence-based treatment, including revascularization therapy, due to uncertainty of the associated benefits and risks in this population. This article addresses key issues regarding medical and revascularization therapy in elderly ACS patients based on a review of the medical literature and in concordance with clinical practice guidelines from the American Heart Association (AHA) and the American College of Cardiology (ACC).

Background The association of antidepressant medication type with the risk of cardiovascular disease ( CVD ) is unclear. We hypothesized that selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors ( SSRI s) are associated with lower risks of CVD events relative to tricyclics and other non- SSRI antidepressants. Methods and Results We studied 2027 participants from the ARIC (Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities) study (mean age 63±10 years; 29% men; 78% white) treated with antidepressants at some time between 1987 and 2013. Antidepressant usage was confirmed by participants bringing pill bottles to study visits. CVD events in the study sample were identified, including atrial fibrillation, heart failure, myocardial infarction, and ischemic stroke. Hazard ratios were used to compare CVD events adjusted for sociodemographic and clinical risk factors in SSRI s users (47%) versus non- SSRI users. Participants were followed from antidepressant initiation up to 2016 for a median of 13.5 years. We identified 332 atrial fibrillation, 365 heart failure, 174 myocardial infarction and 119 ischemic stroke events. CVD risk was similar for SSRI s and non- SSRI antidepressant users (hazard ratio, 1.10; 95% CI , 0.86-1.41 for atrial fibrillation; hazard ratio, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.77-1.25 for heart failure; hazard ratio, 0.91; 95% CI , 0.64-1.29 for myocardial infarction; and hazard ratio, 1.07; 95% CI , 0.70-1.63 for ischemic stroke). Conclusions SSRI use was not associated with reduced risk of incident CVD compared with non- SSRI antidepressant use. These results do not provide evidence supporting the use of SSRI s compared with tricyclics and other non- SSRI antidepressants in relation to CVD risk.