SETTING:
Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) treatment facility, Orel Oblast, Russian Federation. OBJECTIVES: To determine factors associated with poor outcome and to document status of patients after recording of TB outcomes.
DESIGN:
Retrospective review of prospective single cohort.
RESULTS:
Among 192 patients, factors significantly associated with poor outcome in multivariate analysis include three or more treatment interruptions during the intensive phase of therapy and alcohol or drug addiction (adjusted OR [aOR] 2.1, 95%CI 1.0-4.3 and aOR 1.9, 95%CI 1.0-3.7). Previous treatment was associated with poor outcome, but only among smear-positive patients (aOR 3.1, 95%CI 1.3-7.3). Ten patients (5%) developed extensively drug-resistant TB (XDR-TB) during treatment; of 115 patients with at least 6 months of follow-up data after outcomes were recorded, 13 (11%) developed XDR-TB.
CONCLUSION:
Interventions focused on supporting patient adherence during the intensive phase of treatment; the management of drug and alcohol addiction should be developed and studied. A substantial proportion of patients developed XDR-TB during and after treatment. Longer term follow-up data of patients treated for MDR-TB are needed to better inform programmatic policy.
by
Mohammad H. Al-Shaer;
Wael A. Alghamdi;
Abdullah Alsultan;
Guohua An;
Shahriar Ahmed;
Yosra Alkabab;
Sayera Banu;
Ketevan Barbakadze;
Eric Houpt;
Maia Kipiani;
Lali Mikiashvili;
J. Cegielski;
Russell Kempker;
Scott K. Heysell;
Charles A. Peloquin
Fluoroquinolones are group A drugs in tuberculosis guidelines. We aim to compare the culture conversion between new-generation (levofloxacin and moxifloxacin) and old-generation (ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin) fluoroquinolones, develop pharmacokinetic models, and calculate target attainment for levofloxacin and moxifloxacin.
We included three U.S. tuberculosis centers. Patients admitted between 1984 and 2015, infected with drug-resistant tuberculosis, and who had received fluoroquinolones for 28 days were included. Demographics, sputum cultures and susceptibility, treatment regimens, and serum concentrations were collected. A time-to-event analysis was conducted, and Cox proportional hazards model was used to compare the time to culture conversion. Using additional data from ongoing studies, pharmacokinetic modelling and Monte Carlo simulations were performed to assess target attainment for different doses. Overall, 124 patients received fluoroquinolones. The median age was 40 years, and the median weight was 60 kg. Fifty-six patients (45%) received old-generation fluoroquinolones.
New-generation fluoroquinolones showed a faster time to culture conversion (median 16 versus 40 weeks, P 0.012). After adjusting for isoniazid and clofazimine treatment, patients treated with new-generation fluoroquinolones were more likely to have culture conversion (adjusted hazards ratio, 2.16 [95% confidence interval, 1.28 to 3.64]). We included 178 patients in the pharmacokinetic models. Levofloxacin and moxifloxacin were best described by a one-compartment model with first-order absorption and elimination. At least 1,500 to 1,750 mg levofloxacin and 800 mg moxifloxacin may be needed for maximum kill at the current epidemiologic cutoff values.
In summary, new-generation fluoroquinolones showed faster time to culture conversion compared to the old generation. For optimal target attainment at the current MIC values, higher doses of levofloxacin and moxifloxacin may be needed.
Case identification, respiratory isolation, personal protective equipment (PPE), and contact investigation are recent additions to the national dialogue as a consequence of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. They are, of course, long-term components of the tuberculosis (TB) healthcare workers’ (HCWs) vernacular. There are important differences between COVID-19 infection and TB, but nosocomial transmission to HCWs is a critically important shared characteristic.
The Union Drug-resistant tuberculosis (DR-TB) is challenging to diagnose, treat, and prevent, but this situation is slowly changing. If the world is to drastically reduce the incidence of DR-TB, we must stop creating new DR-TB as an essential first step. The DR-TB epidemic that is ongoing should also be directly addressed. First-line drug resistance must be rapidly detected using universal molecular testing for resistance to at least rifampin and, preferably, other key drugs at initial TB diagnosis. DR-TB treatment outcomes must also improve dramatically. Effective use of currently available, new, and repurposed drugs, combined with patient-centered treatment that aids adherence and reduces catastrophic costs, are essential. Innovations within sight, such as short, highly effective, broadly indicated regimens, paired with point-of-care drug susceptibility testing, could accelerate progress in treatment outcomes. Preventing or containing resistance to second-line and novel drugs is also critical and will require high-quality systems for diagnosis, regimen selection, and treatment monitoring. Finally, earlier detection and/or prevention of DR-TB is necessary, with particular attention to airborne infection control, case finding, and preventive therapy for contacts of patients with DR-TB. Implementing these strategies can overcome the barrier that DR-TB represents for global TB elimination efforts, and could ultimately make global elimination of DR-TB (fewer than one annual case per million population worldwide) attainable. There is a strong cost-effectiveness case to support pursuing DR-TB elimination; however, achieving this goal will require substantial global investment plus political and societal commitment at national and local levels.