by
Yiyi Zhang;
Eric Vittinghoff;
Mark J. Pletcher;
Norrina B. Allen;
Adina Zeki Al Hazzouri;
Kristine Yaffe;
Pallavi P. Balte;
Alvaro Alonso;
Anne B. Newman;
Diane G. Ives;
Jamal S. Rana;
Donald Lloyd-Jones;
Ramachandran S. Vasan;
Kirsten Bibbins-Domingo;
Holly Gooding;
Sarah D. de Ferranti;
Elizabeth C. Oelsner;
Andrew E. Moran
Background: Blood pressure (BP) and cholesterol are major modifiable risk factors for cardiovascular disease (CVD), but effects of exposures during young adulthood on later life CVD risk have not been well quantified.
Objective: The authors sought to evaluate the independent associations between young adult exposures to risk factors and later life CVD risk, accounting for later life exposures.
Methods: The authors pooled data from 6 U.S. cohorts with observations spanning the life course from young adulthood to later life, and imputed risk factor trajectories for low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and high-density lipoprotein cholesterols, systolic and diastolic BP starting from age 18 years for every participant. Time-weighted average exposures to each risk factor during young (age 18 to 39 years) and later adulthood (age ≥40 years) were calculated and linked to subsequent risks of coronary heart disease (CHD), heart failure (HF), or stroke.
Results: A total of 36,030 participants were included. During a median follow-up of 17 years, there were 4,570 CHD, 5,119 HF, and 2,862 stroke events. When young and later adult risk factors were considered jointly in the model, young adult LDL ≥100 mg/dl (compared with <100 mg/dl) was associated with a 64% increased risk for CHD, independent of later adult exposures. Similarly, young adult SBP ≥130 mm Hg (compared with <120 mm Hg) was associated with a 37% increased risk for HF, and young adult DBP ≥80 mm Hg (compared with <80 mm Hg) was associated with a 21% increased risk.
Conclusions: Cumulative young adult exposures to elevated systolic BP, diastolic BP and LDL were associated with increased CVD risks in later life, independent of later adult exposures.
by
Jason M. Nagata;
Christopher M. Lee;
Feng Lin;
Kyle T. Ganson;
Kelley Pettee Gabriel;
Alexander Testa;
Dylan B. Jackson;
Erin E. Dooley;
Holly Gooding;
Eric Vittinghoff
Background: Previous studies have analyzed the relationship between screen time and cardiometabolic disease risk factors among adolescents, but few have examined the longitudinal effects of screen time on cardiometabolic health into adulthood using nationally representative data. Objective: To determine prospective associations between screen time and later cardiometabolic disease over a 24-year period using a nationally representative adolescent cohort. Design: Longitudinal prospective cohort data from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health (Add Health) collected from 1994 to 2018. Participants: Adolescents aged 11–18 years old at baseline (1994–1995) followed for 24 years. Main Measures: Predictors: screen time (five repeated measures of self-reported television and video watching from adolescence to adulthood). Outcomes: Five repeated measures of body mass index (BMI); two repeated measures of waist circumference, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and diabetes collected at 15- and 24-year follow-up exams. Key Results: For the 7105 adolescents in the sample (49.7% female, 35.0% non-white), the baseline adolescent average screen time per day was 2.86 ± 0.08 hours per day, which generally declined through 24-year follow-up. Average BMI at baseline was 22.57 ± 0.13 kg/m2, which increased to 30.27 ± 0.18 kg/m2 through follow-up. By 24-year follow-up, 43.4% of participants had obesity, 8.4% had diabetes, 31.8% had hypertension, and 14.9% had hyperlipidemia. In mixed-effects generalized linear models, each additional hour of screen time per day was associated with 0.06 (95% CI 0.04–0.09) within-person increase in BMI. Each additional hour of screen time per day was associated with higher within-person odds of high waist circumference (AOR 1.17, 95% CI 1.09–1.26), obesity (AOR 1.09, 95% CI 1.03–1.15), and diabetes (AOR 1.17, 95% CI 1.07–1.28). Screen time was not significantly associated with hypertension or hyperlipidemia. Conclusions: In this prospective cohort study, higher screen time in adolescence was associated with higher odds of select indicators of cardiometabolic disease in adulthood.
BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular health (CVH) declines in young adulthood, and mood disorders commonly emerge during this life stage. This study examined the association between depression, anxiety, and CVH metrics among young adults. METHODS AND RESULTS: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of participants aged 18 to 34 years who completed the Emory Healthy Aging Study Health History Questionnaire (n=875). We classified participants as having poor, intermediate, or ideal levels of the 8 CVH metrics using definitions set forth by the American Heart Association with adaptions when neces-sary. We defined depression and anxiety as absent, mild, or moderate to severe using standard cutoffs for Patient Health Questionnaire and General Anxiety Disorder scales. We used multivariable regression to examine the association between depression and anxiety and CVH, adjusting for age, sex, race and ethnicity, income, and education. The mean participant age was 28.3 years, and the majority identified as women (724; 82.7%); 129 (14.7%) participants had moderate to severe anxiety, and 128 (14.6%) participants had moderate to severe depression. Compared with those without anxiety, participants with moderate to severe anxiety were less likely to meet ideal levels of physical activity (adjusted prevalence ratio [aPR], 0.60 [95% CI, 0.44– 0.82]), smoking (aPR, 0.90 [95% CI, 0.82– 0.99]), and body mass index (aPR, 0.79 [95% CI, 0.66– 0.95]). Participants with moderate to severe depression were less likely than those without depression to meet ideal levels of physical activity (aPR, 0.48 [95% CI, 0.34– 0.69]), body mass index (aPR, 0.75 [95% CI, 0.61– 0.91]), sleep (aPR, 0.79 [95% CI, 0.66– 0.94]), and blood pressure (aPR, 0.92 [95% CI, 0.86– 0.99]). CONCLUSIONS: Anxiety and depression are associated with less ideal CVH in young adults. Interventions targeting CVH behav-iors such as physical activity, diet, and sleep may improve both mood and CVH.
by
Holly Gooding;
Kolbi Bradley;
Santiago J Arconada Alvarez;
Amanda K Gilmore;
Morgan Greenleaf;
Aayahna Herbert;
Melissa Kottke;
Maren Parsell;
Sierra Patterson;
Tymirra Smith;
Mercedes Sotos-Prieto;
Elizabeth Zeichner
Background: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death among women in the United States. A considerable number of young women already have risk factors for CVD. Awareness of CVD and its risk factors is critical to preventing CVD, yet younger women are less aware of CVD prevalence, its risk factors, and preventative behaviors compared to older women. Objective: The purpose of this study is to assess CVD awareness among adolescent and young adult women and develop a lifestyle-based cardiovascular risk assessment tool for the promotion of CVD awareness among this population. Methods: This study used a 3-phase iterative design process with young women and health care practitioners from primary care and reproductive care clinics in Atlanta, Georgia. In phase 1, we administered a modified version of the American Heart Association Women’s Health Survey to young women, aged 15-24 years (n=67), to assess their general CVD awareness. In phase 2, we interviewed young women, aged 13-21 years (n=10), and their health care practitioners (n=10), to solicit suggestions for adapting the Healthy Heart Score, an existing adult cardiovascular risk assessment tool, for use with this age group. We also aimed to learn more about the barriers and challenges to health behavior change within this population and the clinical practices that serve them. In phase 3, we used the findings from the first 2 phases to create a prototype of a new online cardiovascular risk assessment tool designed specifically for young women. We then used an iterative user-centered design process to collect feedback from approximately 105 young women, aged 13-21 years, as we adapted the tool. Results: Only 10.5% (7/67) of the young women surveyed correctly identified CVD as the leading cause of death among women in the United States. Few respondents reported having discussed their personal risk (4/67, 6%) or family history of CVD (8/67, 11.9%) with a health care provider. During the interviews, young women reported better CVD awareness and knowledge after completing the adult risk assessment tool and suggested making the tool more teen-friendly by incorporating relevant foods and activity options. Health care practitioners emphasized shortening the assessment for easier use within practice and discussed other barriers adolescents may face in adopting heart-healthy behaviors. The result of the iterative design process was a youth-friendly prototype of a cardiovascular risk assessment tool. Conclusions: Adolescent and young adult women demonstrate low awareness of CVD. This study illustrates the potential value of a cardiovascular risk assessment tool adapted for use with young women and showcases the importance of user-centered design when creating digital health interventions.
by
Amanda K. Gilmore;
Elizabeth A. Mosley;
Daniel W. Oesterle;
Leigh E. Ridings;
Idara Umo;
Anna Hutchins;
Holly Gooding;
Elizabeth Wallis;
Sharon Levy;
Kenneth Ruggiero;
Debra Kaysen;
Carla Kmett Danielson;
Shannon Self-Brown
Objective: Adolescents are at risk for substance use, sexual assault, and sexual risk behaviours; however, to date no integrated prevention programmes address all three risk behaviours. The goal of this study was to evaluate the usability and acceptability of Teen Well Check, an e-health prevention programme targeting substance use, sexual assault, and sexual risk among adolescents in primary care settings. Methods: The current study included content analysis of interviews with adolescents in primary care (aged 14–18; n = 25) in the intervention development process, followed by usability and acceptability testing with qualitative interviews among adolescents in primary care (aged 14–18; n = 10) and pediatric primary care providers (n = 11) in the intervention refinement process. All data were collected in the Southeastern U.S. Results: Feedback on Teen Well Check addressed content, engagement and interaction, language and tone, aesthetics, logistics, inclusivity, parent/guardian-related topics, and the application of personal stories. Overall, providers reported they would be likely to use this intervention (5.1 out of 7.0) and recommend it to adolescents (5.4 out of 7.0). Conclusions: These findings suggest preliminary usability and acceptability of Teen Well Check. A randomized clinical trial is needed to assess efficacy.
Objective: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death for American women, yet young women are rarely the target population of CVD prevention campaigns. This study investigated young women's exposure to CVD information. Methods: We surveyed 331 females ages 15–24 years to determine 1) whether participants felt informed about heart disease or stroke, 2) their exposure to heart disease information sources over the past year, and 3) whether they had ever discussed CVD-related topics with healthcare providers. Results: Over half of participants reported feeling not informed about heart disease (52%) or stroke (59%). Participants were more likely to report feeling informed if they were exposed to information from websites or social media, or if they had ever discussed family history of heart disease, personal risk for heart disease, or high blood pressure with their healthcare provider. Conclusions: Most young women did not feel informed about CVD. Exposure to specific information sources and discussions with healthcare providers may help improve this. Practice implications: Public health campaigns should promote cardiovascular health through websites and social media popular amongst young women. Healthcare providers should discuss CVD risk factor modification with young patients in order to promote cardiovascular health across the life course.
Purpose: To assess changes in adolescent visits with substance use disorders (SUDs) at children's hospitals during COVID-19. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adolescents (11–18 years) with SUD diagnoses during a hospital visit in the Pediatric Health Information System. Study periods were defined as spring (03/15–05/31), summer (06/01–08/31), and fall (09/01–12/31), pre-COVID-19 (2017–2019), or during COVID-19 (2020). We summarized the change in weekly median visits and interquartile range (IQR) by characteristics and compared between the two periods (e.g., spring pre-COVID-19 [3/15–05/31/2017–2019] versus spring COVID-19 [3/15–05/31/2020]) using median regression. Results: There were 42,979 SUD visits (10,697 COVID-19; 32,282 pre-COVID-19) and 256 annual weekly median adolescent SUD visits [IQR 235, 280] pre-COVID-19 and 268 [IQR 245, 278] during COVID-19. The median number of weekly SUD visits increased by 14.3% during summer COVID-19 (median visits, [IQR]: 272 [268, 278]) compared to pre-COVID-19 (median visits: 237, IQR [216, 249]; p < .001) but did not significantly differ in spring (p = .091) or fall (p = .65) COVID-19. Discussion: Our findings suggest increased problematic adolescent substance use during summer COVID-19. Efforts to increase the identification and treatment of adolescent SUDs remain critical.
Background: We aimed to develop and validate a rule-based Natural Language Processing (NLP) algorithm to detect sexual history documentation and its five key components [partners, practices, past history of sexually transmitted infections (STIs), protection from STIs, and prevention of pregnancy] among adolescent encounters in the pediatric emergency and inpatient settings. Methods: We iteratively designed a NLP algorithm using pediatric emergency department (ED) provider notes from adolescent ED visits with specific abdominal or genitourinary (GU) chief complaints. The algorithm is composed of regular expressions identifying commonly used phrases in sexual history documentation. We validated this algorithm with inpatient admission notes for adolescents. We calculated the sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, positive predictive value, and F1 score of the tool in each environment using manual chart review as the gold standard. Results: In the ED test cohort with abdominal or GU complaints, 97/179 (54%) provider notes had a sexual history documented, and the NLP algorithm correctly classified each note. In the inpatient validation cohort, 97/321 (30%) admission notes included a sexual history, and the NLP algorithm had 100% sensitivity and 98.2% specificity. The algorithm demonstrated >97% sensitivity and specificity in both settings for detection of elements of a high quality sexual history including protection used and contraception. Type of sexual practice and STI testing offered were also detected with >97% sensitivity and specificity in the ED test cohort with slightly lower performance in the inpatient validation cohort. Conclusion: This NLP algorithm automatically detects the presence of sexual history documentation and its key components in ED and inpatient settings.
by
Lauren Beussink-Nelson;
Abigail S Baldridge;
Elizabeth Hibler;
Natalie A Bello;
Kelly Epps;
Kenzie A Cameron;
Donald M Lloyd-Jones;
Holly Gooding;
Janet M Catov;
Janet W Rich-Edwards;
Lynn M Yee;
Paloma Toledo;
Jennifer M Banayan;
Sadiya S Khan
OBJECTIVE: Women who experience adverse pregnancy outcomes (APO) are at increased risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD); however, their knowledge of CVD risk is not well characterized. We aimed to evaluate knowledge and perception of CVD risk in young women and to determine whether these factors differ based on experience of an APO. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study among women with a recent live birth at an urban medical center. Knowledge and perception of CVD risk were assessed through a self-administered online survey adapted from the American Heart Association Survey of Women's CVD Awareness. RESULTS: Of 5612 individuals contacted between 3/1/21 and 4/18/21, 714 completed the survey; the mean (SD) age was 34 (4) years and 25% reported an APO. While 62% of respondents identified CVD as the leading cause of death in women, there was no significant difference in CVD knowledge scores between participants who reported experiencing an APO and those who did not (6.9 vs 6.8 out of 10; p = 0.51). Participants who reported experiencing an APO had higher perception of personal risk for CVD (adjusted odds ratio, 2.64 [95% CI 1.83-3.80]) compared with participants who did not. Half of participants who experienced an APO reported perceiving average, or below average, risk for CVD and only 41 (22.5%) reported speaking with a healthcare professional about CVD within the past year. CONCLUSIONS: Gaps remain in knowledge of CVD risk among young women, particularly after an APO. The peripartum period may represent a unique opportunity for targeted education when healthcare engagement is high.
Purpose: Heart disease is the number one cause of death in women. Little is known about how adolescent and young adult women perceive their risk of heart disease. Methods: We conducted eight online, semistructured focus groups with 35 young women aged 15–24 years recruited from two primary care practices in Boston, MA. Focus group discussion topics built upon data from a larger sample of women who completed the American Heart Association Women's Health Study survey. Topics included health concerns salient to young women, perceived susceptibility to heart disease, and barriers to heart-healthy behaviors. We used qualitative coding and thematic analyses to synthesize data. Results: Participants were surprised to learn that heart disease is the leading cause of death in women. Young women discussed age (“I feel like those are things I associate with older people like 40”), gender (“I usually hear more about men suffering from heart problems than women”), and social norms (“we're so pressured just to grow up and [be] more focused on pregnancies or depression or our weight”) as reasons for their low perceived risk for heart disease. Participants noted several barriers to adopting heart-healthy behaviors including stress, lack of time, and low perceived risk. “We just don't have time to worry about hearts. Especially if our hearts aren't bothering us to begin with and we can't see it.” Conclusions: Perceptions of age, gender, and social norms contribute to low heart disease awareness among young women, which in turn may limit heart-healthy behaviors.