Ample research links mothers’ postpartum depression (PPD) to adverse interactions with their infants. However, most studies relied on general population samples, whereas a substantial number of women are at elevated depression risk. The purpose of this study was to describe mothers’ interactions with their 6- and 12-month-old infants among women at elevated risk, although with a range of symptom severity. We also identified higher-order factors that best characterized the interactions and tested longitudinal consistency of these factors from 6 to 12 months of infant age. We leveraged data from eight projects across the United States (n = 647), using standardized depression measures and an adaptation of the NICHD Mother-Infant Interaction Scales. Overall, these depression-vulnerable mothers showed high levels of sensitivity and positive regard and low levels of intrusiveness, detachment, and negative regard with their infants. Factor analyses of maternal behaviors identified two overarching factors—“positive engagement” and “negative intrusiveness” that were comparable at 6 and 12 months of infant age. Mothers’ ability to regulate depressed mood was a key behavior that defined “positive engagement” in factor loadings. An exceptionally strong loading of intrusiveness on the second factor suggested its central importance for women at elevated depression risk. Mothers with severe depressive symptoms had significantly more “negative intrusiveness” and less “positive engagement” with their 6-month-old infants than women with moderate or fewer depressive symptoms, suggesting a potential tipping point at which symptoms may interfere with the quality of care. Results provide the foundation for further research into predictors and moderators of women’s interactions with their infant among women at elevated risk for PPD. They also indicate a need for evidence-based interventions that can support more severely depressed women in providing optimal care.
Objective: The Predictors of Remission in Depression to Individual and Combined Treatments [PReDICT] study aimed to identify clinical and biological factors predictive of treatment outcomes in major depressive disorder among treatmentnaive adults. The authors evaluated the efficacy of cognitivebehavioral therapy (CBT) and two antidepressant medications (escitalopram and duloxetine) in patients with major depression and examined the moderating effect of patients' treatment preferences on outcomes.
Method: Adults aged 18-65 with treatment-naive major depression were randomly assigned with equal likelihood to 12 weeks of treatment with escitalopram (10-20 mg/day), duloxetine (30-60 mg/day), or CBT (16 50-minute sessions). Prior torandomization,patients indicatedwhethertheypreferred medication or CBT or had no preference. The primary outcome was change in the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D), administered by raters blinded to treatment.
Results: A total of 344 patients were randomly assigned, with a mean baseline HAM-D score of 19.8 (SD=3.8). The mean estimated overall decreases in HAM-D score did not significantly differ between treatments (CBT: 10.2, escitalopram: 11.1, duloxetine: 11.2). Last observation carried forward remission rates did not significantly differ between treatments (CBT: 41.9%, escitalopram: 46.7%, duloxetine: 54.7%). Patients matched to their preferred treatment were more likely to complete the trial but not more likely to achieve remission.
Conclusions: Treatment guidelines that recommend either an evidence-based psychotherapy or antidepressant medication for nonpsychotic major depression can be extended to treatment-naive patients. Treatment preferences among patients without prior treatment exposuredonot significantly moderate symptomatic outcomes.
Recent research on risk for psychosis has focused on youth who manifest subclinical signs that are often associated with the prodrome to psychosis. Standardized measures of prodromal symptoms have been shown to significantly enhance prediction of risk for conversion to an Axis I psychotic disorder. In the present study, a widely used parent-report measure of behavioral problems, the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) was administered to examine the clinical and diagnostic utility of the measure as an adjunctive screening instrument in the identification of at-risk youth. The CBCL, the Structured Interview for Prodromal Syndromes (SIPS), and other diagnostic measures were administered at baseline and at one year follow-up assessments to adolescents (n = 41) at clinical high-risk for the development of a psychotic disorder. Analyses were conducted to compare the 14 at-risk adolescents who subsequently converted to psychosis to the 27 who did not. Conversion to psychosis was defined as conversion to an Axis I psychotic disorder or affective disorder with psychotic features. Consistent with expectations, at one year follow-up, compared to the Non-Converted participants, the Converted participants manifested significantly higher scores on the prodromal symptom scales of the SIPS. There were, however, no differences in CBCL social and behavioral ratings as a function of conversion status. It is concluded that the CBCL does not show promise as an alternative or adjunctive predictor of conversion to psychosis in at-risk adolescents.